Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Security Guard powers and Citizens Arrest

  • 30-05-2009 9:29am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,517 ✭✭✭


    Hi Guys,

    Just curious about this.

    So you can do a citizen's arrest on someone who has committed an arrestable offence that has a term of 5 years of more in prison.

    Shop lifter leaves the store, or a attempts to with stolen items e.g. something cheap like a pack of condoms. The security guard stops the shop lifter and tries to detain him/her. The shoplifter refuses and leaves anyway using force if necessary to free themselves.

    My understanding is technically the security guard has no rights to stop the shoplifter as such and can pretty much only ask the shoplifter to go with him/her but if the shoplifter refuses then they can just leave.

    On top of that, if for instance the shoplifter takes what they have stolen, gets caught by the security guard and throws it back into the shop and then leaves - has the security guard definitely no power? and I would assume they could not really take an action against the shoplifter either afterwards.

    Is that correct? or can a shop lifter be detained under citizen's arrest?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,530 ✭✭✭TheInquisitor


    axer wrote: »
    Hi Guys,

    Just curious about this.

    So you can do a citizen's arrest on someone who has committed an arrestable offence that has a term of 5 years of more in prison.

    Shop lifter leaves the store, or a attempts to with stolen items e.g. something cheap like a pack of condoms. The security guard stops the shop lifter and tries to detain him/her. The shoplifter refuses and leaves anyway using force if necessary to free themselves.

    My understanding is technically the security guard has no rights to stop the shoplifter as such and can pretty much only ask the shoplifter to go with him/her but if the shoplifter refuses then they can just leave.

    On top of that, if for instance the shoplifter takes what they have stolen, gets caught by the security guard and throws it back into the shop and then leaves - has the security guard definitely no power? and I would assume they could not really take an action against the shoplifter either afterwards.

    Is that correct? or can a shop lifter be detained under citizen's arrest?

    I'm not sure if you can detain them, easier when you just shoot them between the eyes, the scum! Of course they can detain them. Thats like saying i robbed a million dollars from a bank but gave it back because i was caught so really i didn't do anything!! Lock um up and throw away the key


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,441 ✭✭✭jhegarty


    You can technically get 10 years for theft.

    Never going to happen in the case above , but it would still make it an arrestable offence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 341 ✭✭Croc


    It is an arrestable offence

    Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act, 2001
    4.—(1) Subject to section 5 , a person is guilty of theft if he or she dishonestly appropriates property without the consent of its owner and with the intention of depriving its owner of it.

    Penalty
    4. -(6) A person guilty of theft is liable on conviction on indictment to a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or both. (Same Act)


    Criminal Law Act, 1997
    4.—(1) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), any person may arrest without warrant anyone who is or whom he or she, with reasonable cause, suspects to be in the act of committing an arrestable offence.

    Theft is theft no matter what the value


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,517 ✭✭✭axer


    Croc wrote: »
    It is an arrestable offence

    Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act, 2001
    4.—(1) Subject to section 5 , a person is guilty of theft if he or she dishonestly appropriates property without the consent of its owner and with the intention of depriving its owner of it.

    Penalty
    4. -(6) A person guilty of theft is liable on conviction on indictment to a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or both. (Same Act)


    Criminal Law Act, 1997
    4.—(1) Subject to subsections (4) and (5), any person may arrest without warrant anyone who is or whom he or she, with reasonable cause, suspects to be in the act of committing an arrestable offence.

    Theft is theft no matter what the value
    So is there a minimum crime i.e. is the 5 years thing true?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,991 ✭✭✭McCrack


    Yep 5 years minimum to come within definition of arrestable offence


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,769 ✭✭✭nuac


    Suggest people should be careful about exercising "citizens arrest". It is a U.S. idea. Even if there is a statutory power of arrest it must be exercised in accordance with that statute and in accordance with law.

    Wrongful or illegal citizen's arrest would leave the arrestor open to a damages claim.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭happyhappy


    axer wrote: »
    Hi Guys,

    Just curious about this.

    So you can do a citizen's arrest on someone who has committed an arrestable offence that has a term of 5 years of more in prison.

    Shop lifter leaves the store, or a attempts to with stolen items e.g. something cheap like a pack of condoms. The security guard stops the shop lifter and tries to detain him/her. The shoplifter refuses and leaves anyway using force if necessary to free themselves.

    My understanding is technically the security guard has no rights to stop the shoplifter as such and can pretty much only ask the shoplifter to go with him/her but if the shoplifter refuses then they can just leave.

    On top of that, if for instance the shoplifter takes what they have stolen, gets caught by the security guard and throws it back into the shop and then leaves - has the security guard definitely no power? and I would assume they could not really take an action against the shoplifter either afterwards.

    Is that correct? or can a shop lifter be detained under citizen's arrest?

    in all your examples the security guard can 'arrest' the shoplifter, once he /she is handed over to a member of an garda siochana asap. the value of the goods is irrelevant, it is still the same offence.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,473 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    They must hand them over to AGS asap. They can't take them into a back room and start an interrogation pending the arrival of AGS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,157 ✭✭✭Johnny Utah


    I'm not sure if you can detain them, easier when you just shoot them between the eyes, the scum! Of course they can detain them. Thats like saying i robbed a million dollars from a bank but gave it back because i was caught so really i didn't do anything!! Lock um up and throw away the key

    :eek::eek::eek:

    Note: Don't rob this guy's shop! :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Trojan911


    axer wrote: »
    On top of that, if for instance the shoplifter takes what they have stolen, gets caught by the security guard and throws it back into the shop and then leaves - has the security guard definitely no power? and I would assume they could not really take an action against the shoplifter either afterwards.

    Is that correct? or can a shop lifter be detained under citizen's arrest?

    You are confusing the issue here. You say "throws it back into the shop" then you say "then leaves". Which is it, has the perp left the shop or not?

    If the thief has left the shop and throws it back inside when confronted then it is still theft as the act is complete (if all criteria of the Theft Act has been met).


  • Advertisement
Advertisement