Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Stupid formula question

  • 29-03-2009 8:08pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭


    Hi Guys,

    I've got a formula I've attached to this post, and I'm useless with maths. Great with engineering, shocking with maths. If I were to re-jig this formula to have noise on one side of the equation, and everything else on the other, how would I go about it?

    attachment.php?attachmentid=75991&stc=1&d=1238357287


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭mathew


    Engineering kinda relys on being good at maths... you dont really get one with out the other..

    Anyway, see here for rules of logs http://www.purplemath.com/modules/logrules.htm

    Expand it out and then its a simple matter of moving stuff across the equals sign.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    mathew wrote: »
    Engineering kinda relys on being good at maths... you dont really get one with out the other..

    Course you do, there's difference disciplines of engineering. When I was in college, I was top of my labs in circuit modelling, etc, but not the may-west in Maths.
    mathew wrote: »
    Anyway, see here for rules of logs http://www.purplemath.com/modules/logrules.htm

    Great site Mathew, cheers for that. Still have the feeling I'll be up all night, but what the hey.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭mathew


    ned78 wrote: »
    Course you do, there's difference disciplines of engineering. When I was in college, I was top of my labs in circuit modelling, etc, but not the may-west in Maths.

    Fair 'nuff.. I find without maths the Engineering Im studying (general) would be impossible..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭up them Schteps


    I seriously hope this is a joke..... BUT

    10^(SNR/10) = signal / noise

    Noise = Signal / (10^SNR/10)

    => Noise = 10*Signal / 10^SNR


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    I'm getting :

    10^SNR/10=signal/noise

    Noise=signal/10^SNR/10


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭up them Schteps


    ned78 wrote: »
    I'm getting :

    10^SNR/10=signal/noise

    Noise=signal/10^SNR/10

    Thats it! Just make sure that you have (10^SNR/10)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    Thats it! Just make sure that you have (10^SNR/10)

    Cheers UTS, it seems I've the actual equation right now, but when I substitue values in the result's all over the place :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭mathew


    I seriously hope this is a joke..... BUT

    10^(SNR/10) = signal / noise

    Noise = Signal / (10^SNR/10)

    => Noise = 10*Signal / 10^SNR
    your last line there is wrong i think. the SNR/10 is in the power, so you cant bring the 10 above the line..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭up them Schteps


    mathew wrote: »
    your last line there is wrong i think. the SNR/10 is in the power, so you cant bring the 10 above the line..

    I fixed it in my second post. I hate typing equations on computers :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    Say for example my signal is 15, and my SNR is 20 ...

    20=10Log(15/x)
    20/10=Log (15/x)
    2=Log(15) - Log (x)
    2=1.17609 - Log(x)

    Or have I gone horrifically wrong again?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Thomas_S_Hunterson


    I fixed it in my second post. I hate typing equations on computers :(
    Yea, I think there's even a TeX plugin for VBulletin, it'd make things nice and neat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭mathew


    ned78 wrote: »
    Say for example my signal is 15, and my SNR is 20 ...

    20=10Log(15/x)
    20/10=Log (15/x)
    2=Log(15) - Log (x)
    2=1.17609 - Log(x)

    Or have I gone horrifically wrong again?

    no, thats perfect so far
    No all you have to do is bring your 1.17609 over to get:

    -.82319 = log(x)

    then x = 10^(-.82319)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭up them Schteps


    ned78 wrote: »
    I'm getting :

    10^SNR/10=signal/noise

    Noise=signal/10^SNR/10

    Just use these steps! Why are you varying from this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    Woot :) I'm not as stupid as I think I am. Thanks all for the help :)


Advertisement