Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

[article]UK gov to cut speed to 50 mph on all single carriage roads

  • 07-03-2009 11:31pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭


    bar a few! I wonder did they glance this direction first?
    THE government is to cut the national speed limit from 60mph to 50mph on most of Britain’s roads, enforced by a new generation of average speed cameras.

    The reduction , to be imposed as early as next year, will affect two thirds of the country’s road network. Drivers will still be able to reach 70mph on motorways and dual carriageways and 60mph on the safest A roads.

    Jim Fitzpatrick, the roads minister, defended the plan, which will be the most dramatic cut since 1978, when the national speed limit was reduced from 70mph to 60mph.

    “There will be some in the driving lobby who think this is a further attack and a restriction on people’s freedom,” he said. “But when you compare that to the fact we are killing 3,000 people a year on our roads, it would be irresponsible not to do something about it. I’m sure that the vast majority of motorists would support the proposals.”


    New research by the Department for Transport has found that reducing the speed limit could save 200-250 lives a year and also reduce carbon emissions.

    Britain’s roads were the safest in the world until 2001, relative to its population, but have since fallen into sixth place behind countries such as the Netherlands, Sweden and Norway. Some challenge that statistic because of the disparity of the countries’ sizes.

    The new 50mph limit is intended to reduce the high death toll on rural roads, where, in 2007, 69% of car crash fatalities took place. It will apply to single carriage A, B and C roads. Local authorities will have the power to raise the limit to 60mph on the safest roads, but will have to justify it.

    Ministers plan to use average speed cameras, which monitor speeds over distances of up to six miles, to help enforce the new limit. The cameras have already been installed at 43 locations. The Home Office is expected to approve their wider use later this year.

    Speed Check Services, the company behind the cameras, claims the number of deaths or serious injuries at its sites has fallen on average by 60%.

    Fitzpatrick said: “If you look at the figures on rural roads, there are disproportionately more people dying there than on any other roads. The nature of some rural roads, with dips and bends and difficult conditions, means that the 60mph limit is not enough.”

    The 50mph proposal will be laid out in a consultation document to be published in the early summer.

    Edmund King, president of the AA, warned that the move could alienate some motorists. Last year the AA asked 17,481 motorists if the limit on single carriageway roads should be cut to 50mph. Nearly half backed the move but 38% opposed it.

    He said: “There are quitea few single carriageway rural roads that are straight and adequately wide, where 60mph – in the right conditions, driving sensibly — is not a problem.

    “The danger of the blanket approach is: are you going to then reduce speed limits just for the sake of it where you don’t need to? That’s where you lose the respect or the support of the motorist.

    “We all know some rural roads where the 60mph limit is ridiculous, although there are equally others where it suits. So it is a case of getting that balance.”


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    "The new 50mph limit is intended to reduce the high death toll on rural roads, where, in 2007, 69% of car crash fatalities took place. It will apply to single carriage A, B and C roads. Local authorities will have the power to raise the limit to 60mph on the safest roads, but will have to justify it."

    Do they not realise that it's the speed people drive at rather than the posted limit that is partially the issue??:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭Tipsy Mac


    Speed doesn't kill, look at Germany and their Autobahns with no speed limit and one of the lowest death rates in europe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,084 ✭✭✭✭Esel
    Not Your Ornery Onager


    Tipsy Mac wrote: »
    Speed doesn't kill, look at Germany and their Autobahns with no speed limit and one of the lowest death rates in europe.
    Right, because Autobahns = single carriageway roads.....

    Not your ornery onager



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    Tipsy Mac wrote: »
    Speed doesn't kill, look at Germany and their Autobahns with no speed limit and one of the lowest death rates in europe.

    I'm working with a few more on a driver education policy at the moment....poor education is the root cause of road deaths.

    Poor education causes people to:

    -drive at inappropriate speeds
    -be unable to deal with emergency situations
    -think it's okay to have a pint and drive
    -drive on bald tyres
    -drive with 1 headlight

    These are some causes of road deaths, there is only one root cause.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭Tipsy Mac


    ninty9er wrote: »
    I'm working with a few more on a driver education policy at the moment....poor education is the root cause of road deaths.

    Poor education causes people to:

    -drive at inappropriate speeds
    -be unable to deal with emergency situations
    -think it's okay to have a pint and drive
    -drive on bald tyres
    -drive with 1 headlight

    These are some causes of road deaths, there is only one root cause.

    On a motorway a bigger cause would be driving in the outside lane at the speed limit assuming it's the "fast lane".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    Tipsy Mac wrote: »
    On a motorway a bigger cause would be driving in the outside lane at the speed limit assuming it's the "fast lane".
    And one would think it's a "fast lane" because....

    See where I'm going??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭Tipsy Mac


    ninty9er wrote: »
    And one would think it's a "fast lane" because....

    See where I'm going??

    Yeah i agree education is a big thing, i passed my test about 10 years ago but there was little or no mention or testing on knowledge of motorways, i can only think that those in the generation before me would have even less of a breeze.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,313 ✭✭✭Mycroft H


    Tipsy Mac wrote: »
    Speed doesn't kill, look at Germany and their Autobahns with no speed limit and one of the lowest death rates in europe.

    Only a small portion of the autobahns in germany are unregulated speed wise nowadays.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,182 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    And they're going to keep the limit at 70 on their lethal, median-breached, no H/S dual carriageways then?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,044 ✭✭✭AugustusMaximus


    landyman wrote: »
    Only a small portion of the autobahns in germany are unregulated speed wise nowadays.

    More than half of the network has no speed limit as far as I know.


    Lets hope Dan Boyle doens't get light of this development. He's absolutely dying for an excuse to cut 20kph off every speed limit in the country. And this coming from a man who was never even elected to office.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,182 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    More than half of the network has no speed limit as far as I know.


    Lets hope Dan Boyle doens't get light of this development. He's absolutely dying for an excuse to cut 20kph off every speed limit in the country. And this coming from a man who was never even elected to office.

    I suspect the UK is copying us as it is...

    Anyway, Dan Boyle WAS elected. And then wasn't - his constituency didn't want him any more. I suspect thats worse!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,661 ✭✭✭Voodoomelon


    An episode of Megastructures stated that only a third of the Autobahn network has no limit, the rest has strictly enforced limits.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,044 ✭✭✭AugustusMaximus


    On average, about three quarters of the total length of the German autobahn network has no speed limit, about one quarter has a permanent limit, and the remaining parts have a temporary limit for a number of reasons.

    Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autobahn#Germany_4


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,323 ✭✭✭Savman


    ninty9er wrote: »
    poor education is the root cause of road deaths.
    Agree one million percent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,065 ✭✭✭Fighting Irish


    stupid people are the root cause of road deaths


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,530 ✭✭✭TheInquisitor


    Speeding doesn't kill! Bad and stupid driving kills. A BMW 7 series doing 160 on a motorway is not dangerous. A chincochento doing 120 on a motorway is dangerous


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,182 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Speeding doesn't kill! Bad and stupid driving kills. A BMW 7 series doing 160 on a motorway is not dangerous. A chincochento doing 120 on a motorway is dangerous

    You know theres Cinquecento's with significantly better than expected braking systems and acceleration in existence, right? As long as its the 1.1 it is perfectly capable of being driven safely at 120 on a motorway


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,530 ✭✭✭TheInquisitor


    MYOB wrote: »
    You know theres Cinquecento's with significantly better than expected braking systems and acceleration in existence, right? As long as its the 1.1 it is perfectly capable of being driven safely at 120 on a motorway

    Cinquecento's are for city and surburban driving only. Please see boards thread on this subject. And apologies if you have this car....

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055205627


Advertisement