Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Rules Question re Jagielka's clearance.

  • 02-03-2009 10:55am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,016 ✭✭✭


    Not sure if everyone saw Phil Jagielka's goal line clearance against West Brom, for those that didn't he stopped the ball and it bounced into Tim Howard's hands.

    Now, it wasn't intentional, but if it had been, how would the ref have dealt with it. An indirect free kick on the goal line? But then what about the 10 yards.

    Just wondering ( too much time perhaps ).

    :confused:


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,837 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Not sure if everyone saw Phil Jagielka's goal line clearance against West Brom, for those that didn't he stopped the ball and it bounced into Tim Howard's hands.

    Now, it wasn't intentional, but if it had been, how would the ref have dealt with it. An indirect free kick on the goal line? But then what about the 10 yards.

    Just wondering ( too much time perhaps ).

    :confused:
    If it was an intentional pass, and and intentional pass tothe keeper specifically, the ref would have to give a free on the line, yes. The wall would also end up being on the line - you often see this with indirects given in the box, with the wall no where near 10 yards back. Liverpool scored a free kick against someone recently in a similar situation (the wall not being back 10), against Pompey i think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    If it was an intentional pass, and and intentional pass tothe keeper specifically, the ref would have to give a free on the line, yes. The wall would also end up being on the line - you often see this with indirects given in the box, with the wall no where near 10 yards back. Liverpool scored a free kick against someone recently in a similar situation (the wall not being back 10), against Pompey i think.

    Is the 6 yard line not the closest a free can be from? ie, it defaults to the 6 yard line.


    As for the incident. I only saw it once and I reckon it was intentional to a degree. He flicked it to the keeper, probably expectign him to hoof it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,364 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Stekelly wrote: »
    Is the 6 yard line not the closest a free can be from? ie, it defaults to the 6 yard line.

    As far as I know that correct.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    Stekelly wrote: »
    Is the 6 yard line not the closest a free can be from? ie, it defaults to the 6 yard line.
    Indeed, the nearest point on the 6 yard line to where the infraction took place, anyone who's not on the goal line must still be 10 yards away.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    Bluetonic wrote: »
    Indeed, the nearest point on the 6 yard line to where the infraction took place, anyone who's not on the goal line must still be 10 yards away.

    Can you get an infraction for saying thanks to the ref?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,584 ✭✭✭PCPhoto


    Des wrote: »
    Can you get an infraction for saying thanks to the ref?

    you can if its said sarcastically (ie. Rooney last year clapping hands !!! )


Advertisement