Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ashley Cooke elected....

  • 26-02-2009 8:34pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭


    Just thought i'd put that out there...


Comments

  • Posts: 16,720 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Any figures?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭Unregistered.


    Cooke 3,714.
    R.O.N. 471


    I was thinking of putting up a poll. Just to get an idea if people on here think it's fair to have a one horse race.


  • Posts: 16,720 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    4,200 ish eh, good turnout.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭Unregistered.


    Donal wrote: »
    4,200 ish eh, good turnout.
    Especially when you put that into the context of it being a one-horse race - people not bothering to vote for education officer coz of a "there's no point, he has the job" sorta attitude.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,931 ✭✭✭Prof.Badass


    do you know how many spoils there were?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,198 ✭✭✭✭Crash


    Cooke 3,714.
    R.O.N. 471


    I was thinking of putting up a poll. Just to get an idea if people on here think it's fair to have a one horse race.
    ....fair to have a one horse race? What would be your proposal otherwise?

    edit: oh, will someone inform our Uachtarain that she was unfairly elected then, by the way?


  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 21,504 Mod ✭✭✭✭Agent Smith


    Especially when you put that into the context of it being a one-horse race - people not bothering to vote for education officer coz of a "there's no point, he has the job" sorta attitude.

    Unless the voting system has changed since when i was in trinity, Dont people Go and Vote for all 5 positions at the same time?

    IE. The voter gets 5 slips of paper, and each one is for a diffrent position

    1.President
    2.Dep-President
    3.Education
    4.Welfare
    5.Ents

    Now, Even tho Ashley CookeRan unopposed, I Hardly doubt people would Just completly ignore the other elections, or this one (seeing as, other then RON, she was in a 1 horse race)

    I would Imagine, that All of the 5 elections would have a very simular turnout.

    maybe i'm wrong. but i find it hard to believe* that people would just forget or not bother to vote for a (ashley or Ron) candidate in one election, while Voting for others.

    (Please note, chances are that there might be slight differances between the differant elections, e.g President might get Very slightly higher turnout then say, welfare. But i can not see any reason for any major differance in the turnout)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,931 ✭✭✭Prof.Badass


    Unless the voting system has changed since when i was in trinity, Dont people Go and Vote for all 5 positions at the same time?

    IE. The voter gets 5 slips of paper, and each one is for a diffrent position

    1.President
    2.Dep-President
    3.Education
    4.Welfare
    5.Ents

    Now, Even tho Ashley CookeRan unopposed, I Hardly doubt people would Just completly ignore the other elections, or this one (seeing as, other then RON, she was in a 1 horse race)

    I would Imagine, that All of the 5 elections would have a very simular turnout.

    maybe i'm wrong. but i find it hard to believe* that people would just forget or not bother to vote for a (ashley or Ron) candidate in one election, while Voting for others.

    (Please note, chances are that there might be slight differances between the differant elections, e.g President might get Very slightly higher turnout then say, welfare. But i can not see any reason for any major differance in the turnout)

    Ashley Cooke is a dude :eek:!

    In fact all the new officers are.

    I always thought there was something queer about the SU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 159 ✭✭BlueCam


    vinylmesh wrote: »
    Ashley Cooke is a dude :eek:!

    In fact all the new officers are.

    I always thought there was something queer about the SU.

    I hear orgy over in House 6 next year. Cónán on top of course.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    enough with the SU threads already.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭Unregistered.


    Unless the voting system has changed since when i was in trinity, Dont people Go and Vote for all 5 positions at the same time?

    IE. The voter gets 5 slips of paper, and each one is for a diffrent position

    1.President
    2.Dep-President
    3.Education
    4.Welfare
    5.Ents

    Now, Even tho Ashley CookeRan unopposed, I Hardly doubt people would Just completly ignore the other elections, or this one (seeing as, other then RON, she was in a 1 horse race)

    I would Imagine, that All of the 5 elections would have a very simular turnout.


    Yes, but when I was at the hamilton there was plenty of ballot slips around the box that were just left there, not filled out. Nobody forces you to vote once ya pick them up, you could throw them straight into the recycling bin if you wanted to.


Advertisement