Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Gearing Question

  • 02-01-2009 2:52pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭


    Hi all,

    This might be the first silly question of 2009, if so, be nice!! :)

    I'd like to know if it is possible to get an idea of how the gearing would feel on a single speed bike compared to that on my hybrid? If the single speed had a 42T/16 gear what gear would match that on my hybrid?

    All I know about the gears on the hybrid are this:

    GEARS: Shimano TX30 21 speed with STI shifters.
    CRANKS: Suntour XCCT208 guarded chainset 28/38/48T.

    Is this easy to figure out?

    It doesn't have to be exact, I just want to make sure that the small few hills on my commute are manageable without gears....


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,151 ✭✭✭Thomas_S_Hunterson


    It would be in or around 48/18, ie your largest chainring in front and one with 18 teeth on the back if you have one?

    Or alternatively the 38tooth on front and 14/15 teeth on the back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,860 ✭✭✭TinyExplosions


    Sheldon's gear calculator

    -basically, find the gear on your bike that's the same ratio as your proposed single speed 16/42 = 8/21 etc. Roughly speaking, 48/18 is close.

    It's a pretty small gear though, and you'll have no trouble around town on that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,995 ✭✭✭✭blorg


    It is very easy, just divide the chainring by the cog to get the ratio. So 42/16 gives you 2.625.

    With your front cogs this gives you:

    28 10.7
    38 14.5
    48 18.3

    So you need to pick a rear cog closest to one of these combos to approximate. Generally the equivalent gear on a fixie will be a little easier as it is more efficient and I think there is a bit of a flywheel effect.

    This does not account for tyre size but generally that is not a big issue. If you want to account for that, you need to multiply the ratio by the wheel diameter (including tyre) in inches- this will give you the gear in "gear inches" which is generally the number used for comparisons. A rough number used for the diameter of 700c wheels is 27 inches.

    Alternatively go here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭stuf


    Sheldon's gear calculator should help

    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/

    42X16 corresponds to halfway between 15 and 14 on the back while using the middle ring on the front

    remember that your single speed should be a bit lighter than the hybrid so should be easier to climb than the same ration on the hybrid


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭The Machine


    Thanks guys for all the advise! :D

    I'll check the rear cogs before I cycle home and work it out.

    Cheers!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 238 ✭✭ajk24


    Hi guys - I hope the OP doesn't mind me jumping in with a related question.

    I have a Giant SCR4('08) which has a 36/50 front chain ring with a 12-26, 8 speed casette. I want to tackle the Sean Kelly this year and feel in need of a bit of help on the hills. I don't really want to upgrade the bike as triathlons/cycling are secondary to football/study at the moment.

    I asked a more knowledgeable friend about getting a triple but he suggested that a 39/53 would be sufficient for my needs. can I get a yay or nay from you guys please. (by the way the miles of training will be done - I'm not looking to cut corners :D)

    from sheldon's tool the results are

    39 = 6.6, 5.6, 4.9, 4.4, 3.9, 3.6, 3.3, 3.0
    53 = 8.9, 7.6, 6.7, 5.9, 5.3, 4.9, 4.5, 4.1

    36 = 6.1, 5.2, 4.5, 4.0, 3.6, 3.3, 3.0, 2.8
    50 = 8.4, 7.2, 6.3, 5.6, 5.0, 4.6, 4.2, 3.9


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭stuf


    @ajk24

    the small ring's the most relevant for climbs and the 36 will help you more than a 39 - nothing to change


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,505 ✭✭✭✭DirkVoodoo


    Yeah, you would want to be fairly fit and strong on the bike to use a standard double on the hills.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,995 ✭✭✭✭blorg


    @ajk- you currently have a "compact" - what your friend suggests will be harder on the hills, absolutely no point doing that unless you are seriously racing. Your options to (cheaply) make things easier would include swapping the 36 front ring for a 34 (smallest you can go with a compact) and/or swapping your 12-26 for a SRAM 11-28 cassette.

    Going triple is much more expensive and requires replacement of cranks, front derailleur, bottom bracket (I think) and shifters. And probably the rear derailleur too if you have a short cage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 730 ✭✭✭short circuit


    @akj - I have a standard double (53/39) and the bike came with a 12-26 cassette. Though I was able to use it around Wicklow .. some of the fun was lost. Hence staying with the double, I got a 11 - 30 cassette. Though I hardly use the 30 tooth cog .. its made my trips more pleasurable just knowing that I have a bail out cog. If you have a 50/36 ... I think the cheapest change you can do would be to change the cassette to a 11-28 or a 11-30 (in case you have a medium/long cage derailler - a bike shop will be able to confirm this). And if you are going to be putting in the miles before the SK tour ... you will definitely run through 1 cassette .. so you can put the expense down to regular maintenance .. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 238 ✭✭ajk24


    thanks for the responses guys/girls.

    given that the bike was only €540 to begin with there comes a point where trading in against something better might be more worthwhile. that point is not yet reached given that I have been nice to myself this christmas with a new pair of running shoes for my flat feet and a garmin forerunner 405 which will come in very handy for my lunch time ladder sessions - bring on the pain :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,995 ✭✭✭✭blorg


    Good point there from short circuit- technically what you are doing going to 11-30 is using a MTB cassette which is possible with 8 or 9 speed but not with 10 (MTB only goes to 9, while road now goes to 11 :D.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭xz


    ajk24 wrote: »
    Hi guys - I hope the OP doesn't mind me jumping in with a related question.

    I have a Giant SCR4('08) which has a 36/50 front chain ring with a 12-26, 8 speed casette. I want to tackle the Sean Kelly this year and feel in need of a bit of help on the hills. I don't really want to upgrade the bike as triathlons/cycling are secondary to football/study at the moment.

    I asked a more knowledgeable friend about getting a triple but he suggested that a 39/53 would be sufficient for my needs. can I get a yay or nay from you guys please. (by the way the miles of training will be done - I'm not looking to cut corners :D)

    from sheldon's tool the results are

    39 = 6.6, 5.6, 4.9, 4.4, 3.9, 3.6, 3.3, 3.0
    53 = 8.9, 7.6, 6.7, 5.9, 5.3, 4.9, 4.5, 4.1

    36 = 6.1, 5.2, 4.5, 4.0, 3.6, 3.3, 3.0, 2.8
    50 = 8.4, 7.2, 6.3, 5.6, 5.0, 4.6, 4.2, 3.9

    I have the same bike as you, and have been over the Shay Elliott (from both sides) and am 17stone, so you should have no problems. Although, just yesterday I changed it all to a 9 speed, with a 34/50 105 chainset.


Advertisement