Battle of the Coats

Nigsy

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=2158072e-802a-23ad-45f0-274616db87e6

Looks like the white coats are going at it.

Maybe some of them are not getting enough of those big fat government pay checks.

Anyone here still believe in this tatter?

(this is a government website, so no tinfoil hat stuff, mates maybe you will have to use your brain for a change, see through the propaganda.)

m5ex9oqjawdg2i

Ha, of course, it's a natural episode of the earths cycle. It's not made up. I am not sure if we are due a freezing or a cooking but it happens. Being blamed 100% on humans? Bullcrap. There are lots of elements involved. Humans have contributed and may have sped the process up, so I hear.

Nigsy

Landry Puny Skin wrote: »

Ha, of course, it's a natural episode of the earths cycle. It's not made up. I am not sure if we are due a freezing or a cooking but it happens. Being blamed 100% on humans? Bullcrap. There are lots of elements involved. Humans have contributed and may have sped the process up, so I hear.

Thats right about the cycle, crashing the global economy through carbon taxes is on its way. Man has nothing to do with this "warming/cooling/change".

thelordofcheese

Nigsy wrote: »

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=2158072e-802a-23ad-45f0-274616db87e6

Looks like the white coats are going at it.

Maybe some of them are not getting enough of those big fat government pay checks.

Anyone here still believe in this tatter?

(this is a government website, so no tinfoil hat stuff, mates maybe you will have to use your brain for a change, see through the propaganda.)

Scientists disagree over things?
HOLY PENIS, WHAT A SCOOP!

These threads always go the same way, OP starts thread, insinuates everybody who doesn't think like he does is an idiot, which is ironic considering they usually have little to no grasp of the theory behind climate change, thread turns into a cluster fuck.

So, to make this short: You're wrong, and that's all there is to it.

Varkov

Browncoats FTW.

When you can't walk you crawl, and when you can't crawl you find someone to carry you.

Nigsy

thelordofcheese wrote: »

Scientists disagree over things?
.

What happened to the global concensus??????????????????????????

thelordofcheese

Nigsy wrote: »

What happened to the global concensus??????????????????????????

Stop using so many question marks, this is not bebo.

Nigsy

thelordofcheese wrote: »

Stop using so many question marks, this is not bebo.

Bebo????????? I'm not a fan of putting all my details on the net, but then maybe I have something to hide.

humanji

I honestly thought this would be a stupid thread about which colour coat is best, only to find that it's not that good a thread.

m5ex9oqjawdg2i

Nigsy wrote: »

Thats right about the cycle, crashing the global economy through carbon taxes is on its way. Man has nothing to do with this "warming/cooling/change".

Oh? So none of the gases and CFC's we pump into the air (along with ass gas) has anything to do with it? The process normally takes a long time, not a few decades but mileniums. No?

oztots

Male, 20

Searching for warm leather coat to see out the recession. Ex knacker jackets need not apply.

Dragan

If not for the interest Human angle the Al Gore's film would have been rather boring.

Think about it.

FlutterinBantam

Look! how many boffins ,scientists and whitecoats does this global warming crack occupy.

a. Plenty,and all of them on nice fat paychecks .


There's yer answer pilgrim

humanji

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

Look! how many boffins ,scientists and whitecoats does this global warming crack occupy.

a. Plenty,and all of them on nice fat paychecks .


There's yer answer pilgrim

Well, no they're not all on fat pay cheques. Contrary to popular belief not all scientists are well payed, not all scientists are evil and not all scientists are in the employ of the government or large multinationals hell bent on enslaving humanity with nanobots and/or mutants.

Cookie_Monster

humanji wrote: »

I honestly thought this would be a stupid thread about which colour coat is best, only to find that it's not that good a thread.

Thats a much more important question, care to weigh in?

Biggins

I don't know who's right or wrong but I'm investing in a boat large enough to carry a family which can be lived on for a lenghty period of time (just in case!).

If its all a con, we get free sailing holidays.
If it's all true we get free sailing holidays - if we like it or not!

humanji

Cookie_Monster wrote: »

Thats a much more important question, care to weigh in?

I'm going to put this out there. Not many will agree, but I'm going to say it anyway. Take from it what you will:

Black coats are far superior to all others as black will go with anything. There, I said it. And I stand by that remark!

EamonnKeane

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

Look! how many boffins ,scientists and whitecoats does this global warming crack occupy.

a. Plenty,and all of them on nice fat paychecks .


There's yer answer pilgrim

yes, down with the bourgeois intelligentsia...

Cookie_Monster

humanji wrote: »

I'm going to put this out there. Not many will agree, but I'm going to say it anyway. Take from it what you will:

Black coats are far superior to all others as black will go with anything. There, I said it. And I stand by that remark!

A colour rather than a type, daring:eek:

I'm going to go with long coats being the best, cos they are long.

IvyTheTerrible

FlutterinBantam wrote: »

Look! how many boffins ,scientists and whitecoats does this global warming crack occupy.

a. Plenty,and all of them on nice fat paychecks .


There's yer answer pilgrim

Scientists on nice fat paychecks??? That's the funniest thing I've heard all day!

Insect Overlord

Aaaarrggghh, Red Coats, the British are coming! :eek:

Terry

That you're a loon?

Most probably.