Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Beamish to close

  • 05-12-2008 1:17pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭


    Shame to see the Beamish brewey in Cork closing. It will still be brewed in Cork by Murphys/Heineken.
    Tagged:


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 85 ✭✭knightmare


    yknaa wrote: »
    Shame to see the Beamish brewey in Cork closing. It will still be brewed in Cork by Murphys/Heineken.

    Damn shame allright. Competition authority really looked out for the consumer there!
    At least it is still being brewed.
    How long before a pint of beamish costs the same as guinness or murphys?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    If this results in the loss of Beamish Red I will be very, very angry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭yknaa


    Big fan of Beamish Red too ... on the bright side maybe Heineken will promote the drink and get it into more bars around the country.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,975 Mod ✭✭✭✭BeerNut


    knightmare wrote: »
    How long before a pint of beamish costs the same as guinness or murphys?
    The brewery's death warrant was sealed by a set of e-mails from the Commercial Director written in 2004 and 2005 saying that it never intended to undercut Diageo and Heineken on the price of a pint of stout and was only holding off the price increases until the fuss died down. If the actual stated company policy had been to make Beamish a cheaper alternative to Guinness and Murphy's, the Competition Authority could likely have prevented the acquisition.

    Another foreign-owned brewery making bland beer bites the dust. Sad from the point of view of local jobs, but as far as the drinks market goes it makes no difference.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    So that leaves just two, Guinness & Murphys Stout > right?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,975 Mod ✭✭✭✭BeerNut


    Camelot wrote: »
    So that leaves just two, Guinness & Murphys Stout > right?
    Heineken will continue to make Beamish stout, for the moment anyway. I can see Beamish Red going before long: the Competition Authority noted that Ireland's ale market is miniscule -- it'll be hard for the Heineken execs to justify continued production of Beamish Red, I'd say (does Murphy's Red even still exist in this country?). And I reckon Smithwick's and Macardle's aren't long for this world either, with their home breweries closing shortly.

    But the first impact of the Beamish closure is likely to be lager. The same company now makes Heineken, Miller, Coors Light, Amstel, Fosters, Kronenbourg and Carling. There isn't room for all of them. I'd advise any Miller drinkers to start shopping round for alternatives now.

    Plus, there are more and much better Irish stouts than Guinness, Murphy's and Beamish, Camelot.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭yoyo


    I hope Fosters isnt affected by this :eek::eek:

    Nick


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    yoyo wrote: »
    I hope Fosters isnt affected by this :eek::eek:

    Nick

    Heineken probably won't want to continue producing their rivals product :rolleyes:


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭yoyo


    Heineken probably won't want to continue producing their rivals product :rolleyes:
    Feck them if so, having a few Fosters tonite and its much better value :pac: , Still theres always Bavaria, Prasky, Tuborg so not too worried :D

    Nick


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,975 Mod ✭✭✭✭BeerNut


    Heineken probably won't want to continue producing their rivals product :rolleyes:
    While Foster's owned B&C for a while, they've been out of the picture for quite a few years. It's possible that they'll want to keep this sub-prime lager alongside their own, Amstel, and I doubt if Fosters Group will have any problem renewing Heineken's licence to make it.

    It's SABMiller who are Heineken's mortal enemy, and especially now that there are one or two Pilsner Urquell taps around.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭eyebrows63


    you can add scrumpy jack to the list of heineken products aswell. it used to be owned by s & n


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    I've not had a chance to try beamish red yet, raging!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 niallo1


    As a beamish drinker ... this is indeed sad news :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,076 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    I genuinely liked the Cork-made Miller: I thought it was better than the Miller I had in the USA a couple of years ago. (The opposite was true of Coors: can't stand it here, but it went down nicely at a hockey game in Denver last year.)

    You are the type of what the age is searching for, and what it is afraid it has found. I am so glad that you have never done anything, never carved a statue, or painted a picture, or produced anything outside of yourself! Life has been your art. You have set yourself to music. Your days are your sonnets.

    ―Oscar Wilde predicting Social Media, in The Picture of Dorian Gray



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 157 ✭✭MattKane


    That's a real shame. Should use the old building as a museum for beer. Legendary stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭noby


    Heineken probably won't want to continue producing their rivals product :rolleyes:


    I read in an article recently that over 7M pints of Foster's were sold here last year - not sure how that compares with the others , but it seems a decent enough volume to keep it going.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,975 Mod ✭✭✭✭BeerNut


    On the other hand, you don't know how much Foster's Group charge for the licence to do that. Y'know, it's possible they may drop all the B&C licensed beers and stick with the brands they've acquired. A portfolio consisting of just Murphy's, Beamish Stout, Beamish Red, Heineken, Amstel and Coors Light seems to me like a good way to go, from a business point of view.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭eyebrows63


    there was an atricle in the sunday indo yesterday about heineken going after bulmers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Dob74


    What a joke the competition authority is. Beamish is probably the only quality product made in ireland cheaper than its rivals. I am sure hieneken will be changing that, first chance they get. Looking forward to see the apartment blocks and centra they build on the site.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,975 Mod ✭✭✭✭BeerNut


    eyebrows63 wrote: »
    there was an atricle in the sunday indo yesterday about heineken going after bulmers.
    Seems like a typically Sindo piece of made-up speculation to me:
    C&C sell the Bulmers plant to Heineken for conversion into a brewery (why would Heineken want another brewery?) and use the money to buy HP Bulmer from its new owners Heineken, so they can then, what? Rebrand Magners as Bulmers? Make the stuff exclusively in the UK where, according to the Indo, the market for it "has collapsed", and then export it through Irish customs red tape?

    I'd say Paddy Power would give you very good odds for that scenario.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement