Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

static friction and pulley question

  • 07-11-2008 9:20pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 206 ✭✭


    Hey all,
    I was given this problem today by a lecturer as a way of helping us understand the section we just covered and i was wondering if anyone could help me with it.
    we wont go over it again in a lecture as its a diy style thing but i thought maybe someone on here might find it interesting or may have seen it before and could give mae a hand ive pondered for a while myself and think i have an answer. any help is greatly appreciated hope it puzzles you as much as it does me! :D


    Test question:
    Block B, with mass mB, rests on blockA with mass mA, which in turn is on a horizontal tabletop.
    The coefficient of kinetic friction between block A and the tabletop is μk, and the coefficient of static friction between block A and block B is μs. A light string attached to block A passes over a frictionless, massless pulley and block C is suspended from the other end of the string. What is the largest mass mc that block C can have so that blocks A and Bstill slide together when the system is released from rest?:confused:

    the diagram is attached.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 206 ✭✭eagleye7


    The answer that i came up with is




    mc= us.mb + uk.ma


    for the max mc

    im not 100% confident this is right as it was acquired through a bit of guess work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,501 ✭✭✭Delphi91


    Not entirely sure myself either but I "think" that:

    m_c = mu_s * m_b

    Sorry about the lack of scientfic notation - haven't figured out how to do it on here yet :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 861 ✭✭✭Professor_Fink


    Not sure how the others managed to get their answers, but they both seem to be wrong. Consider what happens when the force on B is small, so that B remains static on top of A. The acceleration of the combined mass A+B is given by [a_AB = m_C*g - u_k*(m_A + m_B)*g]/(m_A + m_B)

    As long as this is smaller than u_s*g, mass B will remain static. Thus we have
    u_s*g < [a_AB = m_C*g - u_k*(m_A + m_B)*g]/(m_A + m_B)

    Rearranging this we get
    m_C < (u_s + u_k)*(m_A + m_B)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 206 ✭✭eagleye7


    Thats a brilliant way to think of it it makes a lot more sense to me now thanks Frinky ;):D


Advertisement