Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

long range varminting

  • 04-08-2008 9:32pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭


    any one doing any i had 5 kills over 400 yrds this week one fox three bunnys and a grey crow at 407 a friend had a 500 yrd bunny this eve i miss a 715 bunny by a inch or two were using 243 s and 270 s


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,777 ✭✭✭meathstevie


    That more like ranging in short distance artillery what you're at there :D. I'd have to stand on a hilltop with my hornet to achieve that sort of distances :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,676 ✭✭✭kay 9


    Well guys, when i got my wmr about 6 odd years ago I had no understanding or perception of distance as a newbie. Went out one night and got a fox right between the eyes at approx 170 yards in the dark. so unbelievable old man said fire again. But his eyes didn't even close. I know it's not a legitamate 22 shot. Was amazed myself. Pure luck.... don't usually even dream of taken a shot anymore outside 100/120yds with it. As some of you know though, waiting on a 223. can't wait:D

    The foxes eyes that is ha ha ha:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,072 ✭✭✭clivej


    kay 9 wrote: »
    Well guys, when i got my wmr about 6 odd years ago I had no understanding or perception of distance as a newbie. Went out one night and got a fox right between the eyes at approx 170 yards in the dark. so unbelievable old man said fire again. But his eyes didn't even close. I know it's not a legitamate 22 shot. Was amazed myself. Pure luck.... don't usually even dream of taken a shot anymore outside 100/120yds with it. As some of you know though, waiting on a 223. can't wait:D

    The foxes eyes that is ha ha ha:)

    Also waiting for my 223 license. Then I'll try the long range foxes.:D:D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭Sika_Stalker


    got a few 407 meter shots the other day with the .223 steyr scout
    all greycrows and none of them knew where the shot were coming from.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,072 ✭✭✭clivej


    OK so I getting a CZ varmint .223 and would expect to get shots at 200m+. But are these 400m+ shots really on and will I be able to do them as well??
    What do you shoot off bi-pod (what size), sticks, fence post, gate, free standing :rolleyes:.
    be honest now:D (is that possible on this forum;))


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭jwshooter


    clivej wrote: »
    OK so I getting a CZ varmint .223 and would expect to get shots at 200m+. But are these 400m+ shots realy on and will I be able to do them as well??
    What do you shoot off bi-pod (what size), sticks, fence post, gate, free standing :rolleyes:.
    be honest now:D (is that possible on this forum;))
    we have been shooting balloons out to 500 yrds for a few years now it might be the way for you to start ,we shoot of sand bags and bipods i killed a grey crow at just over 400 last week with a 270 shooting a 110gr norma v max .puff


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!




    There's your goal Clive. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭fish slapped


    Clive, keep it in mind that the .223 was developed from the .222 by the us military because they wanted it to stay supersonic at 400 meters. so it is up to killing at that range as it still has the same velosity and 25% more weight than a high velosity .22 lr at the barrel. As we all know its then down to the man behind the trigger to do his bit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,271 ✭✭✭✭johngalway


    I'd be more interested in how some seem to be loading their own ammo. Not that I'm pointing any fingers like :P


  • Subscribers Posts: 4,076 ✭✭✭IRLConor


    johngalway wrote: »
    I'd be more interested in how some seem to be loading their own ammo. Not that I'm pointing any fingers like :P

    We can just presume that they imported the powder with a permit before the DoJ stopped giving them out. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,271 ✭✭✭✭johngalway


    That was quick, I'm impressed :D


  • Subscribers Posts: 4,076 ✭✭✭IRLConor


    johngalway wrote: »
    That was quick, I'm impressed :D

    I aim to please.



    (Then I pull the trigger for my own satisfaction :D)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭jwshooter


    johngalway wrote: »
    That was quick, I'm impressed :D

    the 110 gr norma v max .270 are off the shelf catrridge


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,271 ✭✭✭✭johngalway


    Well in that case, toodle - oooO! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    Anyone buy ammo for the .223 for longer range shooting (300+). What brand and price are you paying.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,570 ✭✭✭Rovi


    Some interesting long range varminting videos, all from the US-
    http://www.richardscustomrifles.com/huntingvideos.htm
    http://dogbegone.com/

    Richard Franklin's stuff is particularly interesting, in that he's using his own custom built long range target rifles to belt groundhogs.
    The dogbegone offerings are much more professionally produced, but the whoopin' and hollerin' and dramatic music may not be to everyone's taste.

    Neither of them are suitable viewing for sensitive souls. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,374 ✭✭✭J.R.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 498 ✭✭bigred


    Rovi wrote: »
    The dogbegone offerings are much more professionally produced, but the whoopin' and hollerin' and dramatic music may not be to everyone's taste.

    Neither of them are suitable viewing for sensitive souls. :D

    I'd say the exploding gophers would not be for the squeamish :D:D
    I thought they were class :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,570 ✭✭✭Rovi


    J.R. wrote: »
    <snip youtube video>
    That's the part of this activity that makes me uneasy, to be honest.
    Belting rabbits or grey crows or rats or prairie dogs or whatever other small quarry at long ranges with fullbore rifles is one thing; the relative difference between the size of the quarry and the size and speed of the bullet is such that a hit of practically any sort is a kill, and a miss is a miss no matter what calibre is used.
    Going after bigger quarry though is more problematical, in my opinion.
    While the 'kill zone' of a deer is in or around the size of an entire rabbit, a miss on the rabbit is exactly that: a miss; a 'miss' on the kill zone of a deer is much more likely to result in a wounded deer, and one that by definition isn't quick or easy to follow up and dispatch properly as it's so far away in the first place.

    The shooters in the above videos (the varmint ones) are using sophisticated rangefinding equipment and often have spotters watching their fall of shot as they walk the bullets onto the target and usually have plenty of opportunity for sighting shots too; it's more akin to a benchrest target session that anything else.
    And I have no problem with that; the destruction of vermin is a worthy occupation in and of itself, and dead is dead, no matter if the quarry was shot with a pellet gun at 5 meters or a 6.5-284 at 1000.

    Shooting at deer or other larger species at ranges beyond which the shooter can't have a more than reasonable expectation of a clean kill is something that I'd hope no hunter with any sort of respect for the quarry would consider.
    Unless the shooter has access to firepower that delivers the same overwhelming impact to a deer as a high velocity .30 calibre rifle bullet does to a rabbit, it's a wholely different proposition; a tank or artillery piece, perhaps?

    Of course, deer aren't 'vermin' in the normal sense of the word, so their 'destruction' isn't (or isn't supposed to be) the point of hunting them in the first place.

    (and no, I wouldn't condone shooting deer with artillery either! :D)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 942 ✭✭✭gofaster_s13


    Are you using a laser rangefinder or are you shooting at known distances(not doubting you just wondering what way you are operating)

    On a side note I posted on here a while ago about getting a .243 for doing exactly what you are doing now and got a telling off from a few posters:rolleyes:.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭jwshooter


    Rovi wrote: »
    That's the part of this activity that makes me uneasy, to be honest.
    Belting rabbits or grey crows or rats or prairie dogs or whatever other small quarry at long ranges with fullbore rifles is one thing; the relative difference between the size of the quarry and the size and speed of the bullet is such that a hit of practically any sort is a kill, and a miss is a miss no matter what calibre is used.
    Going after bigger quarry though is more problematical, in my opinion.
    While the 'kill zone' of a deer is in or around the size of an entire rabbit, a miss on the rabbit is exactly that: a miss; a 'miss' on the kill zone of a deer is much more likely to result in a wounded deer, and one that by definition isn't quick or easy to follow up and dispatch properly as it's so far away in the first place.

    The shooters in the above videos (the varmint ones) are using sophisticated rangefinding equipment and often have spotters watching their fall of shot as they walk the bullets onto the target and usually have plenty of opportunity for sighting shots too; it's more akin to a benchrest target session that anything else.
    And I have no problem with that; the destruction of vermin is a worthy occupation in and of itself, and dead is dead, no matter if the quarry was shot with a pellet gun at 5 meters or a 6.5-284 at 1000.

    Shooting at deer or other larger species at ranges beyond which the shooter can't have a more than reasonable expectation of a clean kill is something that I'd hope no hunter with any sort of respect for the quarry would consider.
    Unless the shooter has access to firepower that delivers the same overwhelming impact to a deer as a high velocity .30 calibre rifle bullet does to a rabbit, it's a wholely different proposition; a tank or artillery piece, perhaps?

    Of course, deer aren't 'vermin' in the normal sense of the word, so their 'destruction' isn't (or isn't supposed to be) the point of hunting them in the first place.

    (and no, I wouldn't condone shooting deer with artillery either! :D)
    there is a ethical question you have to ask yourself every time you pull the trigger on live game or vermin no matter what it is,i would think there is more pigeons pricked with no 8 trap shot every year than the rest of game lost put together ,some of the deer killed in the videos are shot with a 338 edge using mostly 250gr ballistic tips and there not varmints any way and would not condone shooting them past 200 yrds ..shooting vermin with highpower rifles its a kill or a miss excluding foxes .where i shoot is miles of mountain and safe noting on it only vermin and the odd sheep .all shots are range finded first


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭Sika_Stalker


    Are you using a laser rangefinder or are you shooting at known distances(not doubting you just wondering what way you are operating)

    On a side note I posted on here a while ago about getting a .243 for doing exactly what you are doing now and got a telling off from a few posters:rolleyes:.


    i was shooting at a known distance but i was shooting across a valley into a bank so i was safe enough


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭Sika_Stalker


    Vegeta wrote: »
    Anyone buy ammo for the .223 for longer range shooting (300+). What brand and price are you paying.

    i was using american eagle 55gr if they are touching at 100 metres then they will do the job out to 400 on small vermin but i did do some targeting at that distance also to get a feel for it first


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    i was using american eagle 55gr if they are touching at 100 metres then they will do the job out to 400 on small vermin but i did do some targeting at that distance also to get a feel for it first

    I don't know wast at long range water melon and apples at the weekend and we did sh1te

    I had 75 grain hornady TAP ammo and it was more consistent but still not great

    Maybe I was reading the wind wrong or maybe it was just me


Advertisement