Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

dual core or quad core?

  • 26-06-2008 6:05pm
    #1
    slavetothegrind
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭


    OK,
    so have budget together for new pc.
    Have 700 euro inc vat. No monitor required.
    I need it for music recording at home ( no more than 2 channels at once)
    Possibly for photo and video editing ( basic level stuff)
    Usual mp3's and internet usage, have broadband.
    Don't need speakers mouse or keyboard.
    Don't game on pc

    My question is i intend on using my licenced copy of xp coz the software i have is xp and i am used to it and comfortable with it.
    I realize vista is inevitable and so want to be future proof.

    Is it true that a higher spec dual core is of more use to me running xp?
    Is it true that you have to be running 64bit vista software to take advantage of the quad core tech?
    I understand xp won't see more than 3gb ram?

    Thanks for any and all input!!


Comments

  • #2
    Spear
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,758 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    joeclif wrote: »

    Is it true that a higher spec dual core is of more use to me running xp?
    Is it true that you have to be running 64bit vista software to take advantage of the quad core tech?
    I understand xp won't see more than 3gb ram?

    Thanks for any and all input!!

    Answers are:
    Depends on the app running.
    No.
    32bit XP can't address past 3.25gig of RAM, but the vast majority of apps can't use more than 2 gigs anyway.


  • #3
    MooseJam
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,111 ✭✭✭MooseJam


    i'd get the fasted dual core, with quad core you just have three cores sitting there idle, very few games and apps use four cores


  • #4
    Ghost Train
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,469 ✭✭✭✭Ghost Train


    might be worth getting the quad core, probably wont notice any differance but for processor intensive tasks like compressing video it should help... in the future


  • #5
    Overheal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    MooseJam wrote: »
    i'd get the fasted dual core, with quad core you just have three cores sitting there idle, very few games and apps use four cores

    yet.

    it was the same story for the dual core a year ago.

    Re: 64-bit and Quadcore, I have no idea. But if you want future proof I'd reccomend any new build be geared toward 64-bit processing either way. So I'd go for a Quadcore.


  • #6
    Anti
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭Anti


    get 4/8gb of cheap ram, in talking seriously cheap ram form somewhere like memoryc.ie and get a Q6600 and vista 64bit then yoru laughing.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    slavetothegrind
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭slavetothegrind


    thanks y'all for your input,

    future proofing is probably the way forward, thanks again for your help!


Advertisement