Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Quick Spss Question

  • 10-06-2008 12:29pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 612 ✭✭✭


    Hi all

    I have a problem,

    I have 6 variables,
    Eg.
    A
    B
    C
    AX
    BX
    CX
    which are to be answered to, in ranking order of 1,2,3
    However its possible that more than one can be ranked 1,2,3
    Eg
    A 1
    B 3
    C 2
    AX
    BX 1
    CX 3

    I'm quite rusty at spss, but i want to see if there is any correlation between picking A&B,B&C etc etc.
    Does this mean i have 720 different variables :confused:

    Any tips to get me started :(


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Your post is confusing. You have six variables, right? If you just want to correlate them, I don't see what the problem is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 612 ✭✭✭billstraighten


    yeah, sorry i'm probly making it more confusing

    Im just wondering what way should i input the data, :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Im just wondering what way should i input the data, :confused:

    It looks like you want 6 columns: one for each of your variables. In each column, you will have the 'answers' to each variable [1,2,3 - ordinal or nominal]. Then go to Analyse -> Correlate -> Bivariate.

    Is that what you were trying to do with the data?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 612 ✭✭✭billstraighten


    Basically, i am using it for horse racing,
    There are 6 factors
    (ABCDEF)
    that influence the results
    1,2,3

    Horses can have a combination of these factors
    Ive covered 100 races

    Ideally, i'd like to see what the combinations are
    eg
    A&D= 25 Wins
    B&F=2 Wins

    If i upload the .sav with the data put in, could someone tell me what i'm doing wrong :confused:

    :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Interesting! I see what you're at now, but I wonder what the best analysis would be...

    You could do straight counts which would be simple enough. Also, it seems like a good opportunity for some multiple regression. You can throw up the datasheet if you like and I might have time to go through it later in the week.

    Also, don't forget the 7th factor 'G' - sekrit stuff the trainers know that the punters don't! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 612 ✭✭✭billstraighten


    Haha, yeah i thought it would be a good topic to cover.

    Thanks for the help 2Scoops :D

    http://rapidshare.com/files/122710519/BANKERS_2.sav

    There is the file, hope u can set me straight on a suitable layout, Im using spss 16 which is different to the one in college, maybe thats why :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Here are a few pointers that might help... but it might be a lot of work to rearrange to get some stuff.

    In the current layout you can easily do proportions i.e. how many 1s, 2s, 3s in each factor. Pie charts should do it quickly. If there are remarkable differences then you'll see them straight away. Incidentally, reclassify 'nowhere' as 4, not 0, so it will be on the other end of the ordinal scale.

    Following on from that, you could simply add up the wins for combinations of factors to see how that looks, but I think the number of horses that can be classified as being positive for multiple different factors will be small.

    To get correlations between the factors and winning, you have to set it up very differently. The result (win, 2nd, 3rd etc) will have to get its own column, and each factor should get a nominal yes/no. So, for every winner, list yes/no for each factor; every 2nd place, every 3rd place, every nowhere. Basically, you need a row per horse - you'll end up with a thousand rows of data probably. :eek:

    There might be a simpler way but I can't quite put my finger on it just now - I'll keep thinking about it for a while.


Advertisement