Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Blacks commit proportionately more crime than whites

  • 25-05-2008 4:27pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭


    And allowing significant black immigration into Ireland would not be wise unless you want problems. That's an opinion, (SteveC) and I invite you to discuss it.


«1345678

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    What a dumb opinion. "Blacks" - well there's a heck of a lot of those guys and gals. And blacks where? Africa? America? Brazil? Britain? France? What is he basing this on?
    I've no doubt it's probably the case in a big American city like, say, Chicago. Did he ever consider the reasons why black people are more likely to commit crime than white people? That maybe it's a bit more complicated than simply that "they're black"? Reasons such as: poverty, racial discrimination (e.g. police/courts being harsher on black people than on white people), black people's history still having an effect on the black psyche today etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    Dudess wrote: »
    What a dumb opinion.

    Care to elaborate?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭Susannahmia


    Affable wrote: »
    And allowing significant black immigration into Ireland would not be wise unless you want problems. That's an opinion, (SteveC) and I invite you to discuss it.

    :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,919 ✭✭✭✭Gummy Panda


    Links to where this opinion came from?


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,125 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    Affable wrote: »
    Care to elaborate?
    Because people whose username rhymes with laughable have dumb opinions. No I don't have any proof to back that up with.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    Links to where this opinion came from?

    http://www.topix.com/forum/source/wtlv/TPFET4HPQU714S37C

    One to be going on with. It's generally common knowledge, though I'm sure the UK is so PC I won't be surprised if the true statistics won't be allowed out these days.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    I've elaborated my post.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,125 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    Affable wrote: »
    http://www.topix.com/forum/source/wtlv/TPFET4HPQU714S37C

    One to be going on with. It's generally common knowledge, though I'm sure the UK is so PC I won't be surprised if the true statistics won't be allowed out these days.
    Is there anything backing up those claims?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    Is there anything backing up those claims?

    It's on the Internets you damn fool! What more do you need?! THE INTERNETS!!!!1!


    Users with usernames beginning with the letter 'A' are more likely to be stupid and cause trouble. They should be banned from After Hours. Discuss.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    Is there anything backing up those claims?

    I'll try and find you some more stats.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,163 ✭✭✭✭Boston


    Karoma wrote: »
    Users with usernames beginning with the letter 'A' are more likely to be stupid and cause trouble. They should be banned from After Hours. Discuss.

    The moderators don't have the balls. Prove me wrong, I dare yea


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,789 ✭✭✭Caoimhín


    I could give my considered opinion but if its disagreed with i may be trolling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭monkeyfudge


    Affable wrote: »
    http://www.topix.com/forum/source/wtlv/TPFET4HPQU714S37C

    One to be going on with. It's generally common knowledge, though I'm sure the UK is so PC I won't be surprised if the true statistics won't be allowed out these days.

    That's a post on another forum... and it doesn't back up how the statistics were collected either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    caoibhin wrote: »
    I could give my considered opinion but if its disagreed with i may be trolling.
    Oh yes, you've been so HARSHLY treated, because of course all that trolling shyte you posted was a series of valid, carefully thought out opinions, not gibberish designed to piss people off at all. Oh no.


  • Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Links to where this opinion came from?

    http://www.stormfront.org


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    Dudess wrote: »
    Reasons such as: poverty, racial discrimination (e.g. police/courts being harsher on black people than on white people), black people's history still having an effect on the black psyche today etc.

    Poverty-cause and effect are hard to determine here. Think about WHY they are poor. Perhaps they are poor because they are of the kind of feckless disposition that goes along with criminality.

    Racial discrimination-there are laws dealing with that. If anything the balnce is probably tipped in their favour.

    As for history-that's just a pitiful excuse.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    caoibhin wrote: »
    I could give my considered opinion but if its disagreed with i may be trolling.


    Go ahead...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    That's a post on another forum... and it doesn't back up how the statistics were collected either.

    See post #10, you damn fool.


    Boston: hmmmm... I wonder what happens when one adds 6,413 entries to a forum ban list... I'll have to get AlmightyCushion demodded first :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Affable wrote: »
    Poverty-cause and effect are hard to determine here. Think about WHY they are poor. Perhaps they are poor because they are of the kind of feckless disposition that goes along with criminality.
    And that's simply because of their colour?

    Again, where are these "blacks"? All over the world is it? My god what a study!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,789 ✭✭✭Caoimhín


    Dudess wrote: »
    Oh yes, you've been so HARSHLY treated, because of course all that trolling shyte you posted was a series of valid, carefully thought out opinions, not gibberish designed to piss people off at all. Oh no.

    Hardly gibberish.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    Karoma wrote: »
    It's on the Internets you damn fool! What more do you need?! THE INTERNETS!!!!1!


    Users with usernames beginning with the letter 'A' are more likely to be stupid and cause trouble. They should be banned from After Hours. Discuss.

    Perhaps you could try and be more objective rather than just instantly hating me for saying something un-PC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,248 ✭✭✭Plug


    Affable wrote: »
    And allowing significant black immigration into Ireland would not be wise unless you want problems. That's an opinion, (SteveC) and I invite you to discuss it.
    Theres house directly across the road from me full of blacks. There just trouble.
    I suspect you'd be voting No on the Lisbon treaty?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    Dudess wrote: »
    And that's simply because of their colour?

    Again, where are these "blacks"? All over the world is it? My god what a study!

    All over the world. And yes, why shouldn't it be linked to race. Humans evolved physical differences so why shouldn't they have evolved behavioural/psychological ones too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    Affable wrote: »
    Perhaps you could try and be more objective rather than just instantly hating me for saying something un-PC.

    Oh, I don't hate you. I was agreeing with you. Why do you hurt those who lurv you? why?! WHY?! Is it something in your history?

    As for history-that's just a pitiful excuse.
    You dismissed it, ergo, it's dismissed completely and clearly irrelevant. Damn, you're good. You're no radio DJ hack! You're a political mastermind! To hell with the dissenting fools!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭Susannahmia


    Affable wrote: »
    Perhaps you could try and be more objective rather than just instantly hating me for saying something un-PC.

    Its not that it is un pc it is that it is illogical and narrow minded.


  • Posts: 15,814 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Affable wrote: »
    Perhaps you could try and be more objective rather than just instantly hating me for saying something un-PC.

    I don't think anyone is attacking you for being unpc. It has more to do with the fact that you have yet to offer a grounded argument of basis for your accusations. There is ample evidence to back up what you say like there is ample evidence that contradicts it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,727 ✭✭✭✭Sherifu


    ...


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,125 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    Dudess wrote: »
    And that's simply because of their colour?

    Well I was digging up the garden the other day and my face was covered in mud and dirt. I did feel like killing a load of people so it could be.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,125 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    That isn't a very reputable source. Also some of those "stats" are for crimes by black against whites (and the reverse). What does it matter that the crime was against someone of a different race? If someone robs my house it doesn't make the crime less severe just because it is done by someone of the same race as me?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    Affable wrote: »

    *hands Affable a gun and a map to his feet*


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Affable wrote: »
    Perhaps you could try and be more objective rather than just instantly hating me for saying something un-PC.
    Yawn. There's that lazy, overused expression again. The hostile reception you're getting has fukk all to do with whether it's PC or not, it's to do with the fact that the statement is very ignorant and very stupid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    That isn't a very reputable source. Also some of those "stats" are for crimes by black against whites (and the reverse). What does it matter that the crime was against someone of a different race? If someone robs my house it doesn't make the crime less severe just because it is done by someone of the same race as me?

    Why is it not reputable and what would you class as reputable?
    You're right that colour of the victim maybe should not have been included, still doesn't detract from the picture those stats paint though does it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    Dudess wrote: »
    The hostile reception you're getting has fukk all to do with whether it's PC or not, it's to do with the fact that the statement is very ignorant and very stupid.

    And very true.:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Wow, what a troll! So are you going to prove this "truth" or what?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭Susannahmia


    Affable wrote: »

    Thats hardly an accredited or scholarly article now is it? Go read Bourdieu, Durkheim, Ritzer, Dan Pence, J Fields, Linda Faye Williams. Educate yourself and then you might just be taken seriously.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    Affable wrote: »
    And very true.:rolleyes:

    It's also true that males commit proportionately more crime than females, what do you propose we do about this?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    No word from Affable in a while. I presume (s)he is writing a detailed explanation of how (s)he came to this gem of a conclusion...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭ART6


    Perhaps the problem is uncontrolled immigration? First, let me make my position clear before anyone accuses me of racism (the buzz word nowadays).

    My only daughter wanted to marry a lad whose skin is so black we can't find him in the dark. I not only gave my blessing, but also encouraged her, because he was and is the straightest, most genuine guy I have met in years. His parents, brothers, sisters, are lovely people and we have all, as an enlarged family group, enjoyed many happy hours together, learning from each other and laughing hyterically at each others "racist" jokes.

    So, having got that off my chest, Ireland and the UK seem to have an open door policy that lets anyone in irrespective of whether or not they are going to assimilate and contribute. We have issues of whether or not a girl in school should be allowed to wear a hijab. We have black drug gangs from Jamaica and elsewhere starting feuds and killing people. We have Muslims preaching hate towards us and telling us that their target is that we all become Shia Muslims.

    The solution, I suspect, is the US and Australian model. "What do you bring?" If your intention is simply economic migration, to take advantage of our society, don't bother."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    I don't see how that would cause blacks to commit proportionately more crime than whites though...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    Thats hardly an accredited or scholarly article now is it? Go read Bourdieu, Durkheim, Ritzer, Dan Pence, J Fields, Linda Faye Williams. Educate yourself and then you might just be taken seriously.

    You won't impress me with fancy names. I come from a distinguished academic family and know not to take these people as divine authorities..
    Anyway science (and politics) are not completely objective, they can be influenced by not wanting to come up with conclusions that offend.


    Are people seriously trying to tell me that the stats I produced contain no element of truth?


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,125 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    ART6 wrote: »
    Perhaps the problem is uncontrolled immigration? First, let me make my position clear before anyone accuses me of racism (the buzz word nowadays).

    My only daughter wanted to marry a lad whose skin is so black we can't find him in the dark. I not only gave my blessing, but also encouraged her, because he was and is the straightest, most genuine guy I have met in years. His parents, brothers, sisters, are lovely people and we have all, as an enlarged family group, enjoyed many happy hours together, learning from each other and laughing hyterically at each others "racist" jokes.

    So, having got that off my chest, Ireland and the UK seem to have an open door policy that lets anyone in irrespective of whether or not they are going to assimilate and contribute. We have issues of whether or not a girl in school should be allowed to wear a hijab. We have black drug gangs from Jamaica and elsewhere starting feuds and killing people. We have Muslims preaching hate towards us and telling us that their target is that we all become Shia Muslims.

    The solution, I suspect, is the US and Australian model. "What do you bring?" If your intention is simply economic migration, to take advantage of our society, don't bother."
    I would agree with you to a certain degree but the question should be "Will you contribute?" If someone is here to work and make an honest living then let them come over. If they just want to sponge then they send them back. Also any foreigner who has a serious crime on their record within a certain period of time should not be allowed to enter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,909 ✭✭✭✭Wertz


    Affable wrote: »
    I come from a distinguished academic family

    So you're the black sheep then yeah?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭Susannahmia


    Affable wrote: »
    You won't impress me with fancy names. I come from a distinguished academic family and know not to take these people as divine authorities..

    Are people seriously trying to tell me that the stats I produced contain no element of truth?


    Yes but unlike you they put a lot of research into what they were saying, they were just a few examples go do your own with proper sources (not crappy made up internet ones) and maybe we will take you seriously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭Susannahmia


    Wertz wrote: »
    So you're the black sheep then yeah?

    lol :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    Yes but unlike you they put a lot of research into what they were saying.


    Doesn't mean that not wanting to offend can't tarnish their objectivity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Affable wrote: »
    You won't impress me with fancy names. I come from a distinguished academic family and know not to take these people as divine authorities..
    That's put you on my trolldar... please get off.
    Are people seriously trying to tell me that the stats I produced contain no element of truth?
    Oh I've no doubt it is the case in many places (it would be nice if you could actually narrow it down to specific places though instead of just using the all-encompassing term "blacks" - a tad vague don't ya think?)
    But the extraordinarily dumb part of your opening post about how this could mean bad news if we let "blacks" into this country is what's most bothersome. Because that indicates you feel these stats are down to just race rather than socio-economic reasons. If we're going to go down the eugenics road - i.e. blaming skin colour/race for particular tendencies - then tell me this: what race is responsible for genocides, slavery, the rape of entire continents etc in the name of "civilisation"? Oh yeah... the white race.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Affable wrote: »
    Doesn't mean that not wanted to offend can't tarnish their objectivity.
    What the hell does that mean?

    Anyway, we're waiting on back-up. Thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    Dudess wrote: »
    That's put you on my trolldar... please get off.

    Oh I've no doubt it is the case in many places (it would be nice if you could actually narrow it down to specific places though instead of just using the all-encompassing term "blacks" - a tad vague don't ya think?)
    But the extraordinarily dumb part of your opening post about how this could mean bad news if we let "blacks" into this country is what's most bothersome. Because that indicates you feel these stats are down to just race rather than socio-economic reasons. If we're going to go down the eugenics road - i.e. blaming skin colour/race for particular tendencies - then tell me this: what race is responsible for genocides, slavery, the rape of entire continents etc in the name of "civilisation"? Oh yeah... the white race.

    Actually the Africans are quite partial to the old genocide also, that's not just whites. Africans also enslaved other Africans left right and centre, it still happens to this day. And the empire was mutually beneficial, Africa's been worse since independence.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,212 ✭✭✭Affable


    Dudess wrote: »
    What the hell does that mean?
    .

    It means that people will sometimes avoid the truth if it hurts people's feelings.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement