Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

MacIntyre on Marcuse

  • 20-05-2008 9:10am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 156 ✭✭


    Has anybody read this book - It was published as part of the Fontana Modern Masters Series?

    I am reading it at the moment. I have read a few of MacIntyre's works and some of Marcuse's.

    I am still considering my opinion of it. At the moment I would say that I consider it to be superior to After Virtue and Whose Justice? Which Rationality?

    Does anyone agree?

    Should this go in the political theory forum instead?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭DadaKopf


    I read Marcuse back in the day. Read some McIntyre. While Marcuse comes out with some grand ideas, I think he lacks the rigour, elegance and subtlety of his colleagues like Horkheimer, Adorno, Habermas. A lot of Marcuse's stuff feels clumsy and obvious. Which a lot of obscuritanist philosophy is anyway. At least he popularised a lot of critical Marxian ideas, becoming the 1960s counterculture poster-boy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,163 ✭✭✭hivizman


    DadaKopf wrote: »
    I read Marcuse back in the day. Read some McIntyre. While Marcuse comes out with some grand ideas, I think he lacks the rigour, elegance and subtlety of his colleagues like Horkheimer, Adorno, Habermas. A lot of Marcuse's stuff feels clumsy and obvious. Which a lot of obscuritanist philosophy is anyway. At least he popularised a lot of critical Marxian ideas, becoming the 1960s counterculture poster-boy.

    I think I read the MacIntyre (n.b. spelling!) book on Marcuse many years ago, and I also read, or at least had copies of, Marcuse's Eros and Civilization and One Dimensional Man. As you note, he was rather fashionable in the 1960s and this continued into the 1970s.

    I agree that other members of the "Frankfurt School" are more rigorous than Marcuse. I don't think, though, that it is technically correct to describe Habermas as a "colleague" of Marcuse, because Marcuse left Germany in 1933, when Habermas was only four years old, and didn't return there. Habermas certainly studied under Horkheimer and Adorno in Frankfurt, but he fell out with them, and finished his studies at Marburg. Although Habermas was influenced by the "Frankfurt School", and later in his career took over Horkheimer's chair at Frankfurt, I wouldn't see him as a member of the "Frankfurt School".


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement