Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Was Hitler a good leader?

  • 16-05-2008 2:44pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭


    Nowadays, you often seem to hear people claiming that despite Hitler's failure in the war, he was a fantastic leader and got Germany into shape, and that he was in fact a great man.

    Anyone got any thoughts on this?

    For or against welcome.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,721 ✭✭✭elmolesto


    No, he didn't win the war


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭marcsignal


    Interesting topic Kickouthejams. It’s difficult to see any positive side to Hitler without sounding like a Nazi apologist, considering he was responsible for the deaths of over 50 million people, AND the depravity of the Holocaust. But if we can step back from the Holocaust, and war itself, and look objectively at some of the other things he did in Germany, after he came to power, there are some undeniable facts that would suggest he did some good for Germany and the Germans (ie: Those Germans that weren’t Jewish, Homosexual, Communist, Freemasons, Disabled, etc etc. and that has to be well and clearly noted)

    However before I post anything regarding this, I just want to also make it crystal clear that…
    I AM NOT PROMOTING ADOLF HITLER AS A GREAT MAN, AND I DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO OR POST ON STORMFRONT OR OTHER SIMILAR FORUMS. Just in case there’s anyone from the ADL or ANL reading.

    (Sorry to seem melodramatic, but you have to be abundantly clear about these things these days)

    Below are some interesting things Adolf did that IMO, made him so popular with many Germans before the war, and to some degree helps explain why so many of them saw him as a God, and consequently blindly followed him into the funeral pyre he was heaping up.

    Improved Conditions for German Workers
    Adolf promulgated legislation that gave workers a right to annual vacation time, up to 21 days per year. This was three times more than the next country in Europe (France) was to implement in 1936, as a copy-cat measure to soothe their own workers.
    A giant vacation organization for workers was established, with the duty to provide affordable and enjoyable holidays for workers. Luxury trains, clean, well run holiday resorts in the mountains and at the seashore were built. The program included shops, hotels and convalescent homes.
    Big cruise ships such as "Wilhelm Gustloff", "Robert Ley", "Cap Arkona" and others enabled German workers to take sea cruises. These "Stength Through Joy" ships were barred from British harbors because the British government did not want British workers to see what was available to German workers under National Socialism.
    Before the war began more than half of all Germans had taken advantage of this program to enjoy a luxurious and easily affordable holiday.
    Workers on projects far away from home had always been neglected. Now their needs were catered for. Recreation facilities were established that moved site as construction advanced. Fourteen crews provided movies and other entertainment at different camp sites throughout Germany. Materials were provided to provide comfort, recreation and education, if desired. Laborers had the right to visit their families at intervals. Laborers were given public recognition for the work they did. Labor in Germany became something respected and celebrated.

    First Anti Smoking Laws
    Adolf's mother died from cancer. With profits from his best-selling book "Mein Kampf", he donated 100,000 Marks to cancer research he personally commissioned at the University of Jena. Is there a link between cigarette smoking and cancer? Adolf thought so, and the research he commissioned conclusively proved it. There is a very strong link and smokers are very likely to get cancer.
    The research was conducted in 1941 at the "Scientific Institute for Research into the Hazards of Tobacco", established at the Friedrich-Schiller University in Jena. This was the first such institute in the world.
    With scientific proof to support his initiatives, Adolf made laws forbidding smoking in public places. He started a campaign to tell people how dangerous smoking is and tobacco use fell in Germany. This was the first official anti-smoking campaign in the world.

    - Smoking was banned in the offices of the Air Force, postal services.
    - Smoking was banned by uniformed police
    - Restaurants and cafes were prohibited from selling cigarettes to women
    - Tobacco coupons were denied to pregnant women.
    - It was illegal for anyone under 18 to smoke in public
    - Advertisements for tobacco products were strictly regulated

    Adolf said: "Before going into retirement, I shall order that all the cigarette packets on sale in Europe should have on the label, in letters of fire, the slogan: 'Danger, tobacco smoke kills; danger: Cancer.'"
    During the war tobacco rations were distributed to German soldiers. Adolf ordered that it be given in a manner that would dissuade soldiers from smoking. Smokers were given six cigarettes per man per day, but non-smokers got chocolate or extra food. Women in the Wehrmacht were not allowed to smoke at all.
    The phrase "passive smoking" was coined by Fritz Lickint, author of Tabak und Organismus ("Tobacco and the Organism"). He collaborated in this book with the Nazi Anti-Tobacco League.
    Because of strong Nazi support for Science and medical research, most scientists, physicians and biologists became Nazi party members.
    Germans were encouraged to take exercise, eat plenty of vegetables, drink mineral water instead of alcohol and stop smoking. To reduce breast cancer, women were taught self examination. Nowhere else in the world had such a government sponsored health campaign existed up to that time.
    When the Allies invaded Germany at the end of World War II, on seeing the terrible hunger and deprivations amongst the destitute public, they promptly imported 93,000 tons of tobacco to get Germans smoking again.

    Cancer Prevention Strategy
    Perhaps because his mother died from cancer, Adolf developed a deep interest in health related issues - particularly cancer.
    Ground-breaking research on diseases was done in Germany, partly with private funding from Adolf Hitler who commissioned a study at the University of Jena to determine whether there was a link between lung cancer and smoking. Research results proved that there was such a link and this led to the first public anti-smoking campaign which was vigorously promoted by Adolf.
    The first program in the world to encourage women to perform breast self-examination as an aid to detect breast cancer in its earlier stages was also launched in Germany with Adolf's active encouragement and approval. His support for reform and modernisation in the medical field was viewed by the medical profession in such a positive light that most medical practitioners joined the Nazi party.
    Anomalies in a woman's menstrual cycle was also an indicator of cancer. Women were similarly encouraged to look for anomalies in their menstrual cycle to help detect cancer at an earlier stage. Much public education was done in this regard.
    The public was cautioned against the dangers of radiation, mercury, cadmium and lead. Through the media and schools the German people were advised to avoid the use of artificial food colorants and preservatives in foods and drinks. Instead the use of pharmaceuticals, fertilizers and cosmetics that were based on organic or natural ingredients was encouraged. Sixty years later, most Western countries have still not equalled the high standards of this program.

    First Laws regarding Cruelty to Animals
    Germany was the first country in the world to promulgate laws protecting animals from uncontrolled vivisection and other cruelty. Adolf was a vegetarian because of his empathy with animals. He would eat eggs though, because egg production did not kill the hen that laid the egg. In 1934 Berlin hosted an international conference on animal protection. The motto draped over the speaker's podium stated: "Entire epochs of love will be needed to repay animals for their value and service" In 1936 the German Society for Animal Psychology was established, and in 1938 "Animal Protection" was introduced as a subject for German public schools and universities."

    Things other Politicians have said about Adolf
    "... Hitler is one of the greatest men. The old trust him, the young idolise him.
    It is the worship of a national hero who has served his country."

    - David Lloyd George,
    Prime Minister and Statesman,
    Great Britain.

    "Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived...He had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made."
    - John F. Kennedy,
    President of the
    United States of America

    "In fifteen years that have followed this resolve, he (Hitler) has succeeded in restoring Germany to the most powerful position in Europe, and not only has he restored the position of his country, but he has even, to a very great extent, reversed the results of the Great War ... whatever else may be thought about these exploits they are certainly among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world."
    - Winston Churchill,
    Prime Minister and Statesman,
    Great Britain.


    Well there you go! It just shows what you can do, when you're an Incestous, Drug Abusing, Paranoid, Schizophrenic, Racist Meglomaniac :D:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,986 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    Excellent post marcsignal, I can't even hope to match it.
    Hitler does seem to have a man of contradications.

    I read a recent article about his love for his dog Blondi.
    You've probably seen pics already
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blondi
    He adored it and spent time alone with the dog in the bunker right up until the end. He also spent time playing with the pups which were there also. It seems he was incredibly upset when they tested the cyanide on Blondi and killed her.

    Sorry, this is woefully offtopic but he was an animal lover no question.

    Oh and of course there is Volkswagen, the People's car. An affordable car for the mases, now there was a good inititive. And the autobahns too


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭motherfunker


    You probably have to differentiate between military leader and political leader. Militarialy he was crap, he sunk the best army in the world at the time, politically he was probably one of the best ever, although most of his promises were made on the back of world domination and the rewards that would come with final victory.
    He was however a very smart businessman, he managed to work himself a royalty from every stamp that was sold bearing his image, that being every stamp sold in Germany for a few years. Albers Speer is reported to have seen Hitler being handed a cheque for 50 million marks, about £100,000,000 in todays money, just for his stamp royaltyies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,027 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    He also laid the foundations for space exploration with the development of the V(doodlebug) and finance given to scientists like Von Braun,who later went on to work for the Us and built their rockets.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,560 ✭✭✭DublinWriter


    I raised this question as tactfully as I got with Germans when I lived over there, usually after a few beers.

    I was surprised to learn that many the social improvements that were accredited to Hitler (Autobahns and the public works programmes) were originally devised by the Weimar Government in the 1920's.

    He was initially very clever by surrounding himself with very clever people. The whole concept of Blitzkrieg and was a military strategy devised by a top-ranking retired Wehrmacht Officer in the 1920's. This allowed him to sweep into Paris within days when the horror of the trenches of WW1 were still in living memory. This feat alone made him a demi-God in the eyes of most Germans.

    As a military leader, senior Wehrmacht officers called him 'The Bavarian Corporal' behind his back. Certainly his biggest blunder was Operation Barbarossa, many historians claim that he masterminded this plan after bindging on Codeine and various uppers administered to him by his personal GP.

    Well done to the OP for starting this conversation. I don't believe history has ever had an impartial evaluation of Adolf Hitler as we all rush in there to label him a monster.

    The wisest words I've ever heard about examining Hitler from a historical context came from a Rabbi whose name escapes me. He said that to basically label Hitler as a monster robs him of his humanity in the same way that he robbed many Jews of their humanity. Simply calling him a monster is too much of a convenient method to pass-off his crimes against humanity and that he requires a deeper evaluation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Lockstep


    For the record folks, I'm referring to his leadership of Germany, not his military stuff.



    I'm not saying which side of the camp I fall on. Curse of trying to appear impartial, but fair play to everyone for reasons so far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭marcsignal


    I was surprised to learn that many the social improvements that were accredited to Hitler (Autobahns and the public works programmes) were originally devised by the Weimar Government in the 1920's.

    Yes that's very true, but I cant help wondering if the Weimar Government could have pulled these projects off. I think Adolf had the advantage of very cheap labour from the 'Arbeitsdeinst' (Labour Front). They got the Autobahn's finished in record time and made the achievement look so much more impressive to the world. I remember visiting 'Berchtesgarten' last summer, and even the small mountain roads leading up to the place were just mind blowing.
    As a military leader, senior Wehrmacht officers called him 'The Bavarian Corporal' behind his back. Certainly his biggest blunder was Operation Barbarossa, many historians claim that he masterminded this plan after bindging on Codeine and various uppers administered to him by his personal GP.

    I agree, he was secretly despised by many of the General Staff, and the feeling was mutual. His drug habit certainly contributed to many of his erratic decisions later in the war. There's also no doubt the resulting paranoia led to a lot of people being put up against the wall too, who otherwise might have survived had he laid off the old Metaamphetemine.
    Well done to the OP for starting this conversation. I don't believe history has ever had an impartial evaluation of Adolf Hitler as we all rush in there to label him a monster.

    I second that, well done to the OP.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    Another thing to keep in mind is that the "economic miracle" that he performed (leading Germany out of the aftermath of the great depression) which provided work for almost everybody, was in its entirety financed on the basis that all the money spent / loaned / borrowed / printed and faked would have to be re-couped by waging war and robbing the conquered neighbours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭Lockstep



    Well done to the OP for starting this conversation. I don't believe history has ever had an impartial evaluation of Adolf Hitler as we all rush in there to label him a monster.

    *blushes*

    Thanks folks, but I feel the need to state that I don;t really support either camp, probably just as well that I ride the fence as to whether he was good or not, as this would a lot harder to moderate this forum.


    Hats off to everyone so far for good courteous debating.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭ojewriej


    I think it's wrong to diferretiate between economical, social, political and military side of Hitler's actions.

    He did some good stuff, that's hard to deny (although one wonder how much of iut only looked good only because of Nazis propaganda machine), but at the end of the day, he turned half of Europe - most of Gremany included - into rubbles, killing millions in the process. And it wasn't by accident either, but more or less his plan from the very beginning.

    Even now, 60 years after the war ended, there are still people hating Germans for what he and his croonies did - I don't think it's a sign of a good leader.

    No motorways, holidays or cancer screening programs are worth it imo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 119 ✭✭Z


    Well my ideals and "world views" are broadly similar to Hitler, so I'm going to be biased in this, but yes I would say that he was a great leader.
    He was a notable orator, as most of historys great leaders were. Able to spur 1000s into motivation, able to captivate the imagination and minds of millions.
    When he would talk, he would start off quiet, and there would be 100,000 quiet people in the crowd, but he would slowly work his way up, build miomentum and by the end, he would be shouting. The crowd latches onto this momentum and gets "into" it as well, getting excited and so on.

    Hitler was an excellent delegator of tasks, able to put together a very powerful government, and able to oversee the construction of the single greatest army in the war. He was a visionary.

    RIP Adolf Hitler.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    Z wrote: »
    He was a visionary.

    RIP Adolf Hitler.

    You are aware that stuff like that could buy you a five year prison sentence in Germany?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volksverhetzung
    (3) Whoever publicly or in a meeting approves of, denies or renders harmless an act committed under the rule of National Socialism of the type indicated in Section 220a subsection (1), in a manner capable of disturbing the public piece shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than five years or a fine.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭ojewriej


    Z wrote: »
    He was a visionary.

    RIP Adolf Hitler.

    No ony denies his oratory skills.

    What do you make off all the people killed, the Holocaust, turning his own country into complete ruin - do his oratory skills even all this out?

    peasant wrote: »
    You are aware that stuff like that could buy you a five year prison sentence in Germany?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volksverhetzung

    Good thing we are not in Germany then. Throwing people to jail for their views was Hitler's modus operandi too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 119 ✭✭Z


    peasant wrote: »
    You are aware that stuff like that could buy you a five year prison sentence in Germany?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volksverhetzung
    From your own wikipedia article quoted "from german criminal law"
    This means that it is law in Germany.
    Fortunately for me, I don't reside in Germany, nor do the boards.ie servers.
    As such your point is irrelevant, as is your post.
    In the unlikely event that your question was not rhetorical, well then yes, I was aware of that, and I will refer you to point (1) in this post.
    thanks.

    Perhaps I laboured my point too much earlier sorry, I'm not a "nazi" or anything I just think that yes he was a good leader, and Germany under his (admittedly horrid) rule made some amazing advances (not denying the bad!). As opposed to someone like Stalin who was an undeniably bad leader!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭ojewriej


    Z wrote: »
    Perhaps I laboured my point too much earlier sorry, I'm not a "nazi" or anything I just think that yes he was a good leader, and Germany under his (admittedly horrid) rule made some amazing advances (not denying the bad!). As opposed to someone like Stalin who was an undeniably bad leader!

    Even if we consider the advancements made, don't you think that the way it all ended kind of cancels them out? So he seemingly was a good leader for a few years, but then he destroyed the whole country and half of Europe with it.

    You say Stalin was a "undeniably" bad leader - but he did stop nazis from conquering Soviet Union. So was he a good leader to some extent?

    That's why I think both of them were extremely bad leaders, if you look at the overall outcome of their rule.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭marcsignal


    ojewriej wrote: »
    Even if we consider the advancements made, don't you think that the way it all ended kind of cancels them out? So he seemingly was a good leader for a few years, but then he destroyed the whole country and half of Europe with it.

    Yeah, I'd have to agree with you there ojewriej. Despite his achievements domestically in Germany, the smell of blood travels very far, and his legacy has cast a long dark shadow over Germany, and the Germans to this day. Even Monty Python and Basil Fawlty have had a go at him ;).

    The thing I find most disturbing about the rise of Hitler, is the way the Nazi movement used Mass Media to promote themselves. So much so, that I have an uneasy suspicion of mass media myself today. You can see for yourself the kind of crap that ordinary Americans are fed by Fox News about the Iraq war, as an example.
    Z wrote: »
    Hitler was an excellent delegator of tasks, able to put together a very powerful government, and able to oversee the construction of the single greatest army in the war.

    I'd have to raise the point here, that he was an excellent delegator because he was indolent, didn't get up until 2 O clock in the afternoon, and disliked dealing with matters of Government himself. In fact he frequently delegated the same task to 2 or more people, and then stood back and watched them fight it out for his favour. In the end he often adopted the idea of the most enthusiastic person, as opposed to the best plan.

    Where nearly all leaders have 1 public office which represents them to the Citizens of a country, Hitler had 5 offices ALL claiming to represent him, and the people in these posts nearly ALL hated each other. This kind of confusion was rampant throughout the Nazi regime, which ironically is always associated with Order and Discipline.

    *slightly off topic below*

    Another thing I was told by a old German, who wasn't a Party Member, but not an opponent of the regime nonetheless, was that children were encouraged to make out their Family Tree in school. The completed Family Trees were then passed on, by the teacher, to the local Doctor (who was always an SS member). They were then scrutinised to find any medical defects in families. If your 'Uncle Fritz' was discovered to be unmarried, maybe as a result of mental illness, he was then summoned to the a State Hospital to be sterilized. Now you can say Sweden, for example, were sterilizing some people up to the mid 1970's, but I've always found this particular example an appalling deceit and a gross abuse of any citizens personal information.

    Having said all of that, retrospect is a wonderful thing, especially 60 years after the fact. But I'll put my hands up now and admit, if I was a young unemployed man in Germany in the 1930's, bombarded with Propaganda, and heard Hitler speak, with the Parades and the Flags etc etc, I'd very probably have ended up going along with it too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    marcsignal wrote: »
    Having said all of that, retrospect is a wonderful thing, especially 60 years after the fact. But I'll put my hands up now and admit, if I was a young unemployed man in Germany in the 1930's, bombarded with Propaganda, and heard Hitler speak, with the Parades and the Flags etc etc, I'd very probably have ended up going along with it too.


    And you would have had very little choice but to :D

    As I've said before, when Hitler came to power he had the support of roughly 1/3 of the population (nothing like the popularity reading that todays politicians need if they even want a sniff of power)

    He then quickly used the weak Weimar democracy against itself and gained total control, also quickly followed by the total integration of anything and everything into the Nazi apparatus.

    Other than such comparatively trifle things like animal protection, cancer research and anti-smoking laws (all borne out of personal interest rather than for the "greater good") you can't really credibly credit him with having done any "good" at all.

    To list a few famous examples:

    The economic boom:
    Financed (criminally and fraudulently so) in such a way that the only way to prevent Germany from going bancrupt was to go to war and rob the neighbours.

    The autobahn:
    Ever noticed that most of the early ones led from West to East and very few from North to South? Any quick guesses why? Hint: it wasn't infrastructure for the common people.

    The Kraft durch Freude movement:
    Yes, there was a cruiseship or two and some holiday resort. But let me tell you what there wasn't anymore: no unions, no private workers clubs, no private sports clubs, no extracurricular activity at all that wasn't absorbed into the Nazi controlled KDF apparatus. So you were either with them, or out there on your own.

    The youth organisations:
    Yes, it got the kids off the streets ...and straight into the arms of the Nazi movement. If you weren't in it you got nowhere (neither in school, nor university or in work). Young children were indoctrinated to such a degree that they ratted out their own parents to the Nazi system

    Law and order:
    The SA literally beat the opposition from the streets, only then to be slaughtered itself by the SS. The judiciary was infested with Nazi judges and others made tow the line. The gestapo could incarcerate your whole family if you were accused of wrongdoing. Whole groups of people (socialists, communists, homosexuals, active Christians, Jehovas witnesses) just disappeared into concentration camps, never to be seen again.

    And that's only the "positive" things without going into the negative ones like the persecution of the Jews, the euthansia of handicapped people, etc, etc


    I really CAN NOT understand these feeble attempts at finding any good in Hitler that one hears so frequently:

    "Oh he was a great man ...well, he lost the war ..and he caused the death of millions ...ah, and the unfortunate thing about the Jews...BUT he was a great leader for the Germans"

    He was me arse !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭marcsignal


    peasant wrote: »
    And you would have had very little choice but to :D
    Yeah, very true, and you’re right about total incorporation of most other things under the umbrella of the regime.
    peasant wrote: »
    Other than such comparatively trifle things like animal protection, cancer research and anti-smoking laws (all borne out of personal interest rather than for the "greater good") you can't really credibly credit him with having done any "good" at all.

    These laws do seem trivial, but a return to nature, and all things natural, figured very strongly in the German Psyche, and still do today. The people were shocked at the millions of deaths caused by the mechanization of warfare in WW1, and there was a strong desire among many Germans to preserve nature in German life and culture. Adolf just exploited this.
    All things organic is still big business in every little town in Germany today.
    peasant wrote: »
    The economic boom:
    Financed (criminally and fraudulently so) in such a way that the only way to prevent Germany from going bancrupt was to go to war and rob the neighbours.

    Absolutely right, can’t argue with you there.
    peasant wrote: »
    The autobahn:
    Ever noticed that most of the early ones led from West to East and very few from North to South? Any quick guesses why? Hint: it wasn't infrastructure for the common people.

    Yeah I’ve heard that assertion before, that he was going to use them to move military equipment quickly from East to West, and visa versa etc. But there are 2 things I’m confused about here:

    1) The commonly accepted assertion that the Autobahn was a Weimar concept that he stole. Now if that was the case, presumably he re-wrote all the original plans of the network, to fit that possible scenario of needing it to move military equipment East West & visa versa?

    2) At the time they were being constructed, he wasn’t aware he would end up fighting a war on 2 fronts, so why build them with this in mind? In fact he went out of his way to try to avoid such a scenario.

    Not contradicting you here, as such, just playing devil’s advocate, sort of ;)
    peasant wrote: »
    The Kraft durch Freude movement:
    Yes, there was a cruiseship or two and some holiday resort. But let me tell you what there wasn't anymore: no unions, no private workers clubs, no private sports clubs, no extracurricular activity at all that wasn't absorbed into the Nazi controlled KDF apparatus. So you were either with them, or out there on your own.

    Not sure I can agree with everything here, the Kraft durch Freude movement was huge, well thought out, clever, and is cited by many old Germans I’ve spoken to as one of the most positive memories they have of those times, if that is conceivable.

    Yes Trade Unions were abolished, but Adolf had it in for the Trade Union Leaders themselves, because they were mainly Leftists, more so than the concept of workers rights and conditions. In fact many of the Labour laws passed then, protecting German workers, are still in use today, I was surprised myself to learn.

    I will agree, certainly, you were either with them, or you were nothing. But overall I agree with you, in the sense that it was definitely a sinister movement, dressed up as something very different to deceive people.

    Great Orator: Yes!
    Great Motivator: Yes!
    Shrewd Cookie: Definitely!!

    It's just a gigantic shame for ALL concerned, that Adolf Hitler was NOT a Gentleman......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    marcsignal wrote: »
    there was a strong desire among many Germans to preserve nature in German life and culture. Adolf just exploited this.

    Not sure I can agree with everything here, the Kraft durch Freude movement was huge, well thought out, clever, and is cited by many old Germans I’ve spoken to as one of the most positive memories they have of those times, if that is conceivable.

    In fact many of the Labour laws passed then, protecting German workers, are still in use today, I was surprised myself to learn.

    You can summarize all that in on quick stroke:

    He had to give the "common people" something to keep them happy and their minds off all the unpleasant things that were going on.
    Opposition is so much harder to muster, when just running along with the flow is incentivised :D

    As for the labour laws ...they were the National SOCIALIST Party after all. A few token gestures made more willing workers.


    Autobahn planning?

    tbh ...I haven't a clue what Hitlers Plans were or weren't in Detail. I know that he personally re-drew the routing of two motorway sections (A8 "Drackensteiner Hang" and "Irschenberg") against all the advice from traffic experts to grant users of the motorway a favourable view of the beauty of their fatherland.

    Is that a positive thing?
    Both these spots even today are notorious for long tailbacks :D

    Fact is, the autobahn came in handy for transporting troops and material (traffic volume in those days certainly wasn't high enough to justify the cost just for quicker personal transport) and to create employment.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭marcsignal


    peasant wrote: »
    I know that he personally re-drew the routing of two motorway sections (A8 "Drackensteiner Hang" and "Irschenberg") against all the advice from traffic experts to grant users of the motorway a favourable view of the beauty of their fatherland.

    'Typical Shabby Nazi Trick', as Captain Mainwaring would say:)
    peasant wrote: »
    Both these spots even today are notorious for long tailbacks :D

    That'll be the all the 'Rubbernecks' slowing down, looking for the 'Favourable View' :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,930 ✭✭✭✭TerrorFirmer


    Not to mention it was Hitler's finance minister that developed all these plans attributable to Hitler, who himself had no interest in economics. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,355 ✭✭✭Belfast


    Nowadays, you often seem to hear people claiming that despite Hitler's failure in the war, he was a fantastic leader and got Germany into shape, and that he was in fact a great man.

    Anyone got any thoughts on this?

    For or against welcome.

    No the was not a good leader.
    He bankrupted Germany before the war started. German before the war was a command and control economy.
    The Reichsmark had the status of junk bonds. All German's international trade had to be done by Barter.
    The German ecomomy before the war was biased on Enron type economics.

    There were some good thing that were done when Hitler was in power conservation of wildlife, setting up national park, and laws against cruelty to animals. These were Hermann Goring's pet projects.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,134 ✭✭✭✭Grizzly 45


    Great Orator..Hardly.He rehearsed for hours his speeches.Unlike Mussolini who could speak naturally and amazing for an Italian without all the yelling screaming of Adolf.
    The Kraft durch Freude,well my German grand parents went on one and always said it was as if you were in a Nazi propaganda movie for 24/7.It was all comaradely friendly indoctrination,never letting you alone for a minute to yourselves.
    Animal rights..Well,that has always been in German law moreso than the UK.Again stolen and incorporated into Adolfs personal agenda.hunting laws,well Germany had them already,they became more politisied under the 3rd Reich.
    Church tax[Kirchen steuer] anyone who has lived in Sthn Germany will know this one.You pay a tax for the useage of the privilidge of going or not to church.Another one of Adolfs pet ideas,tax the churches,and thereby encourage the German people into a pagan free religion.

    As for the 100,000 at his rallies,all you had to do was say the equivlency of a free U2 gig, in Dublin RDS to fill it to capacity. Same with Adolf,he was pouplar because he gave the Germans back their sense of identity and national pride.He was the ultimate showman.
    Funnily enough when you ask the older generation of Germans today,what was it that attracted a very intelligent race that has added countless benefits to mankind in all fields of endevour to a no hoper Austrian artist[who had Irish relatives :eek:],IOW what was his message.They all answer the same,they dont know anymore,it was a personality cult with the message being Hitler.

    "If you want to keep someone away from your house, Just fire the shotgun through the door."

    Vice President [and former lawyer] Joe Biden Field& Stream Magazine interview Feb 2013 "



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭JcDubz4life


    Obviuosly Hitler was a viscous, evil monster has who permanantly scarred the human race by his actions. Still, forgetting all of thet, what he did was nothing short of amazing. He managed to take control of a shattered, broke, hated nation and turn it into a world superpower in less a decade. That is pretty impressive no matter who he is. Imagine taking Iraq today and by say, 2020 have turned it into the dominent force in the world, which Germany could have so easily have been.

    Regardless of his achievments in this sense, however, he was still a monster who inflicted horrific suffering on countless millions of human beings


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,136 ✭✭✭WooPeeA


    IMO Hitler wasn't a good leader. He was puting people in the jail, even his own citizens, he was against democracy, elections etc.. He was too ambitious for war. He was fighting on 3 fronts at the same time (west, east and Africa) and planing attack on USA even though he was loosing. Very bad leader.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 815 ✭✭✭todolist


    The fact there's so many books,films,documentary's on Adolf Hitler proves he's a major historical figure.He was at times a great leader and other times bad.Certainly in terms of intellect,he was vastly superior to Churchill,Stalin,Roosevelt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭dresden8


    Z wrote: »
    From your own wikipedia article quoted "from german criminal law"
    This means that it is law in Germany.
    Fortunately for me, I don't reside in Germany, nor do the boards.ie servers.
    As such your point is irrelevant, as is your post.


    You'd want to be careful there


    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/oct/10/germany
    He is wanted by a district court in Mannheim, Germany, for posting information of an "anti-Semitic or revisionist nature" on the internet from 2002 onwards.

    Toben used his Australian-based website to refute that the Holocaust took place on the scale accepted by the vast majority of historians.

    While it is not a crime to express such opinions in the UK, it is a specific offence in Germany and Austria.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭KTRIC


    I'd love to show this thread to my girlfriends mother, elderly aunts and uncle, they'd have a great laugh altogether :rolleyes:

    They were all alive during the war and seen it first hand from the German civilian point of view.

    They lost their home, her uncle was "recruited" into the Hitler Youth and her aunt Lee was imprisoned for not cooking the books of the local Gestapo.


    All because of Hitler's war. It doesn't matter what he did before the war, a lot of which wasn't his work. It was all cancelled out when he decided the world was his oyster.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,191 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    When people like Hitler Stalin and other such like come to power millions of people die .60 million died during the war ,military and civillian alike .The civillians died in Hitlers concentration camps ,Stalins Gulags (unless the long march in the freezing cold got you first ) .Over two million german women were raped by the russians after the invasion of germany not to mention the hundreds of thousends murdered and raped by both sides in the ukraine ,lituania ,and other eastern block countrys .

    Was Hitler a good leader ? If he had allowed his generals more power and input instead of trying to write his own map of europe as he saw it he might have earned the respect and might have changed the course of history .But his egomainc unstable personality would not accept the real realitys of the war , only as he saw them .It's a credit to the germans that they fought well in many battles against the russians and western allies .

    But Hitler as a good leader ? In a word No


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Hitler wasnt a political leader as such he was more akin to the leader of a cult which managed to take over a country , the idiology of the party was a complete fiction and in economic terms it was completely unsustainable. There are no redeeming features I can see, by definition every dictator has to have an element of "bread and circuses" for the masses and psycologically short of being a complete sociopath, hitler might have viewed the situation as seeing the end justiying the means, but that is not much consolation.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



Advertisement