IoffL Mod is a childish disgrace

blueline

cgarvey wrote: »

St0n3d banned for 1 week for WUMming, giving inaccurate and misleading advice and failing to clarify on request.

I think that was uncalled for. If you cant take his advice or wrap it around your own heads, then put your head down into the sand and hide.

Since when do Boards.ie hire childish admin?

Your a disgrace. After reading all his posts, I see not one flame, one curse, one cocky post . Yet another "genuine" member banned for knowing too much.

bealtine

blueline wrote: »

Yet another "genuine" member banned for knowing too much.

That's a matter of opinion.

Advice contrary to general wisdom and practice is generally useless advice.

Furthermore claiming X is a legal requirement and then refusing to back up the claim and then being utterly vague is childish in the extreme and downright misleading.

cgarvey

Discsussion on how I'm childish and I'm a disgrace moved from this thread.

I have no response to make on the matter other than my actions are always open and in line with the forum charter.

Sherifu

Who are you blueline? 4 posts in early 2006 and now this post. Was St0n3d banned in early 2006 too? There are so many things wrong with your post i'm not gonna read any further.

Ponster

A poor rant IMO. You could have done better OP to hold back the lolcats.

seamus

As the "silent" IOFFL mod I completely support this ban.

The poster in question was all text and no content. He even stated (in a roundabout way) that he had no desire in the discussion, rather opting to just spout.

For the recored, cgarvey and every other moderator are neither "hired" nor are they admins.

blueline, declare your interest now. I know that you know the poster in question.

Dades

WUMming?

Well, you learn something new every day.

cgarvey

WUMming with a question mark implies (to me) one of 4 things:

1) You don't think he was winding anyone up. If so, I disagree.
2) You don't like the second 'm' in there? If so, I justify it by other English words following that line. E.g. "sum" and "summing".
3) You don't like the "ing" part of it. If so, then I can see the argument for "being a WUM" vs. "wumming", but the latter seems to be more regularly used of late.
4) You just didn't know what it was. Period. If so, then I was there once!

Ponster

Err, that's great but some of us *still* don't kknow what it means!

Sherifu

Wind Up Merchant

seamus

Can we not just say "troll" like the olden days?

bealtine

seamus wrote: »

Can we not just say "troll" like the olden days?

olden days *snigger*...

FruitLover

How is one week off anything to make a song and dance about? I'm banned for life from Personal Issues, you don't see me moaning.

Plan_D

seamus wrote: »

Can we not just say "troll" like the olden days?

Times they are a changing moose!

bealtine

bealtine wrote: »

olden days *snigger*...

In the real olden days I guess they'd refer to blueline as a "sock puppet".

jonski

So then , does the 'ing' make it winding up merchant , or wind up merchanting ?

Sherifu

jonski wrote: »

So then , does the 'ing' make it winding up merchant , or wind up merchanting ?

The latter.

Riskymove

Indeed....he is a WUM as he carries out WUMing

a day with something learned is a day not wasted!

STEVO B

bealtine wrote: »

Advice contrary to general wisdom and practice is generally useless advice.

Spoken by a man 'I feel' much lacking in wisdom.

Genghiz Cohen

Jeebuz! It's is only a week ban, take it like a man (up the arse).

Thanx 4 The Fish

FruitLover wrote: »

How is one week off anything to make a song and dance about? I'm banned for life from Personal Issues, you don't see me moaning.

Certainly not in PI anyway....

Hitchhiker's Guide to...

Thanx 4 The Fish wrote: »

Certainly not in PI anyway....

boom boom

Bob the Builder

Thanx 4 The Fish wrote: »

Certainly not in PI anyway....

Well he can always go unreg for a few mins and start trolling, not that it's going to make much of a difference, but, sher you'll have that!

popebenny16

nevf wrote: »

Well he can always go unreg for a few mins and start trolling, not that it's going to make much of a difference, but, sher you'll have that!

if you get banned from PI and it really, really upsets you, I think you should be allowed post about it on PI just so someone can tell you to join a club or summin.....

pirelli

seamus wrote: »

As the "silent" IOFFL mod I completely support this ban.

The poster in question was all text and no content. He even stated (in a roundabout way) that he had no desire in the discussion, rather opting to just spout.

For the recored, cgarvey and every other moderator are neither "hired" nor are they admins.

blueline, declare your interest now. I know that you know the poster in question.

Your starting to trend toward's I always back my buddy mods. what ever that makes your posts.

Poor chap was just out of hospital. I suppose users should be medically fit before they use their internet now. Pfft. "Spouting" Heartless ban.

seamus

pirelli wrote: »

Your starting to trend toward's I always back my buddy mods. what ever that makes your posts.

Yes, one post makes a "trend". I haven't forgotten about your issue or your PM, just haven't found the time to decipher it.

Poor chap was just out of hospital.

Irrelevant.

Jack Sheehan

Could someone design some sort of filter that dosn't let you post a thread in Feedback if it contains the words 'disgrace,nazi,banned,unfairly or mods'? This forum is like liveline these days.

cgarvey

In blueline's defence, it was I that chose the thread title having moved a couple of posts from an existing thread. Your point still stands, obviously.

Sherifu

cgarvey wrote: »

In blueline's defence, it was I that chose the thread title having moved a couple of posts from an existing thread. Your point still stands, obviously.

Well it does justice to his post Not really misrepresentation.

Bob the Builder

Jack Sheehan wrote: »

Could someone design some sort of filter that dosn't let you post a thread in Feedback if it contains the words 'disgrace,nazi,banned,unfairly or mods'? This forum is like liveline these days.

it's a good job it isn't a ring-in show or we'd be fecked altogether!

Slow Motion

nevf wrote: »

it's a good job it isn't a ring-in show or we'd be fecked altogether!

The cat pics wouldn't be as effective on radio!

Jack Sheehan

Slow Motion wrote: »

The cat pics wouldn't be as effective on radio!

'Well Joe its a cat you see, and hes sort of looking behind him, and and theres a theres a big white FAIL printed underneath him....hello?'