Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

International Poker Open 2008

  • 13-02-2008 09:31PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭


    Hi all,

    Little help needed;

    Would you prefer?

    Option A: 1,000 runner event starting on a Saturday morning with 100 players coming back for play on Day 2.

    Option B: 1,200 runner event with 600 players starting on a Friday (Day 1A) and another 600 players starting on a Saturday (Day 1B). Day 2 would be Sunday and a winner would be declared before the end of the day.

    I don't want to influence the vote too much but basically option A means a lot of hassle as regards finding 120 staff (not impossible but close to it) to run Day 1.

    Option B allows us to provide players with a standard that they could compare with the EPT etc as we would staff it with at least 85 people for the 600 players. It also means that up to 600 players will need to take a day off work.

    Opinions please and remember that the whole purpose of this tournament is to open up and make accessable a big field poker tournaments for players that normally have a max buy-in of €20-€50. Its not really aimed at people that normally have a minimum buy-in of €200.

    Which would you rather? (Public Poll) 14 votes

    Option A
    0%
    Option B
    100%
    DEmeant0rLexTrueDubBluredEl StuntmanGoodluck2medannydiamondblackbeardGrangeUtdAce2007ConbroTribezzflopmehappyUnknown 14 votes


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,088 ✭✭✭rag2gar


    Option A seems better, its cool seeing 1000 players in one room!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭carfax


    Errr....Thought I posted a poll here, have to call for help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,070 ✭✭✭Ollieboy


    why not have day 1A on Saturday, day 1B on Sunday, that way your only putting out 100 people on the Monday and there all in the money.

    Also, a buy-in of 200 at least!

    best of luck with it.

    I also think option 1 is a nitemare for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,406 ✭✭✭Goodluck2me


    Option B
    I`d go for Option1 but only if its feasible to do it properly, if its not then limit it to 800 or w/e you can manage effectively.
    I think €200 this year too. 175+25 I think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,860 ✭✭✭ditpoker


    is there a bank holiday around then, work it into that weekend maybe!?

    i'd say keep the buy in at 150, remember while everyone on boards (and he student market of boards ) are a year older and wiser and supposedly richer, your target market's budget hasnt changed,so while i originally thought "yea, im with joe, 200 sounds good" with a bit of thought i know two years ago that would have put me off. i will play 200, but alot wont. 150 worked last time, if it aint broke, dont fix it.

    3 day allows for more time to generate rake at cash tables.

    3 day allows people like myself play day 1, deal day 2, or vice versa.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    Whatever happens just make sure that all players are under the same roof when we get to the money and no phones are used etc etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 663 ✭✭✭CourierCollie


    Ollieboy wrote: »
    why not have day 1A on Saturday, day 1B on Sunday, that way your only putting out 100 people on the Monday and there all in the money.

    Also, a buy-in of 200 at least!

    best of luck with it.

    I also think option 1 is a nitemare for you.

    I totally agree with Ollieboy. Nobody would mind pulling a sickie on a Monday if there in the money. Taking a day off on a Friday, for what could be 1 hours playing, sure yed only get students. Not that there's anything wrong with that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 661 ✭✭✭dK1NG


    Agree that people would be much less inclined to take the fri off.

    I'd vote for option one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 694 ✭✭✭Get In There


    I totally agree with Ollieboy. Nobody would mind pulling a sickie on a Monday if there in the money. Taking a day off on a Friday, for what could be 1 hours playing, sure yed only get students. Not that there's anything wrong with that.


    I agree also...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 596 ✭✭✭winstons pt


    Ollieboy wrote: »
    why not have day 1A on Saturday, day 1B on Sunday, that way your only putting out 100 people on the Monday and there all in the money.

    Also, a buy-in of 200 at least!

    best of luck with it.

    I also think option 1 is a nitemare for you.

    Hi Stephan, i think ollieboy is right, if players have to come back on the Monday, it will be only 100 or so,and they have some money, players will have peace of mind on the saturday and sunday, i seen how busy you were last year, its not worth it man, this would be a lot easy for you and you could give more att to players when they need you, plus buy in €175 + €25
    Anyway i wish you the very best of luck with it.
    If you need any help let me know........Paddy


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,477 ✭✭✭newbie2


    Ollieboy wrote: »
    why not have day 1A on Saturday, day 1B on Sunday, that way your only putting out 100 people on the Monday and there all in the money.

    Also, a buy-in of 200 at least!

    best of luck with it.

    I also think option 1 is a nitemare for you.
    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,315 ✭✭✭✭mdwexford


    Yeah Ollie's suggestion sounds good, if not then option B as self deal tables sucked last time. Getting 100+ dealers is impossible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,706 ✭✭✭green123


    yeah ollie made this suggestion before , and it sounds like a good idea


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭Tinytony


    Like Ollies option too.

    Think you should leave the buy-in as it is as you will definitely lose the more casual players if you up it to €200 and as you've said this is your main target area for this tournament.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭carfax


    Tinytony wrote: »
    Like Ollies option too.

    Think you should leave the buy-in as it is as you will definitely lose the more casual players if you up it to €200 and as you've said this is your main target area for this tournament.


    Agree with is alright but the thing that everyone has missed so far is that Day 2 players cannot have made the money before the start of play on that day.

    i.e. Day 1A might have 100 players remaining and Day 1B might have 200.....Therefore 300 are now coming back for play, do we then re-structure the prize-pool to pay all 300?.....

    Our whole point this year is to make sure that players get a proper service for the €25 reg, so option B it is......We want to steer clear of bank holidays so I think that anyone wishing to play will have to either register early to ensure their seat on day 1B or simply take a Friday off work to play on Day 1A (think about it though if you plan even two months in advance its not going to be a problem to take a Friday off, is it?).

    I've had dozens of emails already from overseas players that are planning to bring their families over for the weekend so a Friday for Day 1A will be perfect for them as it will allow them to spend time with their families on the Saturday whether they are still in the tournament or not. I know we will be taking a risk with it but I think it is better than relying on 200 odd players taking a sickie on a Monday morning (remember lots of poker players work for themselves and therefore can't take sickies).

    Stephen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭Ste05


    Poll added (slightly incorrectly by me :(), then poll closed, then thread locked, then some other Ste05 messing, finally all posts moved to a new thread, basically some uber mod skills showed and a great display by me to correct a tiny error.

    But it should all be done now.

    Public Poll added.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭carfax


    Cheers Ste.....I think if we get 100 votes it will give us a good overall idea although all of the posts so far have been very constructive.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 450 ✭✭Blip


    carfax wrote: »
    Agree with is alright but the thing that everyone has missed so far is that Day 2 players cannot have made the money before the start of play on that day.

    i.e. Day 1A might have 100 players remaining and Day 1B might have 200.....Therefore 300 are now coming back for play, do we then re-structure the prize-pool to pay all 300?.....


    Just play down to 50 runners on each day,

    Can we add Ollie's suggestion to the poll?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭carfax


    Its a close thing in the poll so far.....Very interesting :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭carfax


    Blip wrote: »
    Just play down to 50 runners on each day,

    Can we add Ollie's suggestion to the poll?

    This is more of just a guideline for uswhen organising it (we basically have our mind made up but want to make sure we aren't doing something that nobody will play in.....

    __________

    As regards playing down to 50 on each day my point is that you simply can't forecast exactly how many players will be left by a given level and you have to play the same amount of time for both Day 1A and Day 1B, otherwise when you come back for play on day 2 half the field could be at 300-600 and the other half at 500-1,000.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭carfax


    Wow, ok funny how these polls can start out all even and then you start to get a majority.....

    Think its looking like option B, quality....Might be harder to promote, i.e. Saturday will probably fill before the Friday but in terms of running the tournament it means we will be able to enjoy it more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41 WayneD1982


    Option B gives u the chance to make sure every player is looked after and is happy with the the fact proper dealers are in front of them...Last year i was on a self dealt table and even though it wasnt for that long it didnt feel like a proper tourney,more like a pub game....In the end it was a very good day nut defo Option B this year


    When are u planning to have it this year Ste?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭ZZR1100


    aggree with olly. definatly needs to be a 200 entry.
    Also make sure it doesnt clash with connies festival in Oct as this will take a large chunk of people out of your tourney although it is a 500


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭carfax


    WayneD1982 wrote: »
    When are u planning to have it this year Ste?

    It will be around the same time as last year mate....We'll be able to announce everything soon enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭carfax


    ZZR1100 wrote: »
    aggree with olly. definatly needs to be a 200 entry.
    Also make sure it doesnt clash with connies festival in Oct as this will take a large chunk of people out of your tourney although it is a 500

    Cheers for the advice we'll take that on board.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 342 ✭✭mickc


    Whats the difference in structure between the 2 options?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭carfax


    mickc wrote: »
    Whats the difference in structure between the 2 options?

    Blind structure??? More or less the exact same just less of a marathon-in-a-day if option B


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 342 ✭✭mickc


    thanks..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭mcaul


    dK1NG wrote: »
    Agree that people would be much less inclined to take the fri off.

    I'd vote for option one.

    A 3pm start on Fiday would mean a half day at most for those who can't take the day off. A late finish is compensated by a Saturday morning lie-in whereas the Saturday players would have early start & early finish meaning less tired players on the final day.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,860 ✭✭✭ditpoker


    mcaul wrote: »
    A 3pm start on Fiday would mean a half day at most for those who can't take the day off. A late finish is compensated by a Saturday morning lie-in whereas the Saturday players would have early start & early finish meaning less tired players on the final day.

    most sensible post so far...the man talks sense!

    i'll play the friday so all the sharks know to avoid me and so at least 1 person shows up on friday... :p


Advertisement