Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

In Bruges (2008)

  • 17-01-2008 10:54pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭


    IMDb

    I really REALLY wanted to like this trailer. Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson starring in a buddy comedy not too far off 'I Went Down' and directed by Martin McDonagh (who won the 'Best Short Film' Oscar back in 2006 for the short 'Six Shooter' with Brendan Gleeson).

    But alas the trailer is a bit of a washout. Not particularly funny. Though the "ye're a bunch of elephants" line did give me a giggle but it really doesn't sell the film to me.

    EDIT: Actually.. the "ye're a bunch of elephants" line isn't in the trailer below. It's on the censored trailer over at Apple.com but the one below actually has one or two funny moments.

    Almost like a mish-mash of other better films - buddy-comedy a lá 'I Went Down' mixed with the flair / hyperactivity of a Guy Ritchie film but just not as exciting or worthwhile.

    Shame really!

    Trailer:


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    i dont know why but everytime colin farrell speaks in that trailer he makes me think of dougle from father ted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭User45701


    sorry basquille but i actually think that will be good, as you mentioned six shooter was fantastic, this wont be as good but should still be a good laugh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,592 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    I watched the trailer on apple.com a few weeks ago not knowing anything about the film, and I was pleasantly surprised. It looks very stylish, it's got a good cast and there's some great lines in the trailer.

    One to watch, me thinks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 423 ✭✭Petey2006


    I'm actually looking forward to this one. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,626 ✭✭✭Stargal


    The film opened the Sundance Festival last night and there's already a review of it up on Hollywood Elsewhere. The review says that while the trailer is crap, the film itself is excellent. For those who are too lazy to click on the link:
    Martin McDonagh's In Bruges (Focus Features, 2.8) is a much, much better film than the trailer suggests. It's a classic "surprise" package -- looks like nothing but fastballs, is actually about curves, sliders and change-ups. And affecting amounts of heart, braininess, compassion and symmetry. And laughs -- it's a very funny piece.

    I've just come from the opening-night screening of this fascinating, above- average intellectual crime romp at Park City's Eccles Theatre, and I'm waiting for the after-party to start at 10 pm.

    The In Bruges trailer isn't an out-and-out lie, but it ignores what's really fine and special about the film. Critics and bloggers are supposed to spread the word (and I'm doing that right now) but why didn't Focus let me see this film last Monday? I wouldn't have to be sitting in a bar and banging this out right now.

    We're living in a twisted marketing world today. Got a gangster film that works for adult viewers as well as action fans? Keep the critics from seeing before it plays Sundance, and do everything in your power to persuade the adults in the ad campaign that this movie is not for them -- sell only to the under-30 adrenaline junkies. Sell it as a hyper, funny, gun-crazy Guy Ritchie or early Quentin Tarantino crime film. Thematic richness be damned. Skillfully written characters, moments of tenderness, oddball humor...**** all that! Just go for the guns, guys and popcorn.

    In Bruges has a good amount of gunplay and blood in the third act, yes, but it's mainly about tourism, morality, character, good writing, humanity and terrible guilt. It's about standing up for what you believe (even if it hurts), and also about on-the-fly whimsy and joy and weirdness and pretty girls and pretty views.

    Did I mention that it's funny and sometimes hilarious? I did?

    In Bruges also delights because it offers another deeply touching performance by Colin Farrell, playing a young screw-up who develops a conscience and a soul along the way. It's a revelation for those who may have thought Farrell was on the ropes. He's found his thing -- he magnificent at playing morally tortured losers. This on top of his enormously touching turn as a somewhat similar character in Woody Allen's Cassandra's Dream tells me he's turned a big corner.

    McDonagh, a famed playwright in London and New York circles, has composed a delightfully skewed, carefully balanced watercolor crime movie. And he's shown at the same time that he knows from visual energy and how to make a scene or shot really come off.

    This is the best opening-night Sundance film I've ever seen. I know that's not saying much because the tendency is always to play soft audience pleasers, but In Bruges is a lot more than just "pleasing" or "entertaining."

    Costars Brendan Gleason and Ralph Fiennes are awesome as well -- funny, vulernable, thoughtful. The supporting cast, in fact, is one of the biggest surprises because every character has angularity, intrigue, particularity. I'll get into this a bit more tomorrow, but this has been a delightful Sundance start.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 327 ✭✭sme


    i thought that the trailer was fairly good. i don't like colin farrel in the slightest but ralph fiennes being evil, well that just has to be seen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37 strangesdays


    The first sundance reviews are in, and its getting a whole lotta love. The first is here, its AICN, so expect alot of gushing and hyperbole about its 'awsomeness', the second (here) Is Cinematical, who generally do more belivable reviews. But both reviewers seem to really *really* like it. Colour me excited.


    First reviews apart form Hollywood Elsewhere I mean. I have to learn to read.


Advertisement