If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)

Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Discussion:Royal Bank of Scotland v Etdridge (No.2)

_JOE_ · 2007-12-13 17:45:03

In light of the above seminal decision, is Ireland likely to take the same approach?

13-12-2007 5:45pm

#1

_JOE_

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭

Join Date: December 2007

Posts: 465

In light of the above seminal decision, is Ireland likely to take the same approach?

0

Comments

#2 14-12-2007 12:43am

Tom Young

Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: May 2005

Posts: 4233

Can you clarify the context, is it:

1. Constructive notice;
2. Undue influence; or
3. Agents/solicitors duties?

0
#3 14-12-2007 4:19pm

Tom Young

Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: May 2005

Posts: 4233

Reference case for 6 points by which a bank might/may rebutt the presumption of marital Undue Influence. Overrode aspects of Barclays Bank v O'Brien.

0