Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Please help.... Fourier analysis

  • 06-12-2007 2:52am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 192 ✭✭


    quesvk6.th.jpg

    I know it is to do with the formula

    66964408co1.th.jpg

    But dont know how to do it..

    Any advise?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 144 ✭✭tdow


    ok i might be wrong here but it looks like you're leaving out part of the question. it looks like you should be told what f1(t), f2(t), f3(t) ... are , and there will be some relationship between them e.g. f2(t) = 2f1(t), so in this case, all you'd have to do is multiply the fourier series for f1(t) by 2 to find the fourier series for f2(t)


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Michael Collins


    Yep you need to know what the other functions are! My guess is that the other functions are probably related to the given one as tdow said, either by a scaler multiple or change of DC component or change of period or something - so you probably won't have to actually compute a Fourier series at all, just apply a few simple relationships.

    If you want us to help you further you'll have to post up the full question!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 192 ✭✭jtiernan


    I'm sorry I did not post the first part of the question. I pasted it wrong.


    questka4.th.jpg

    I thought I could just solve f2, f3 etc. individually and wondered why he solved and referenced f1?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Michael Collins


    jtiernan wrote: »
    I thought I could just solve f2, f3 etc. individually and wondered why he solved and referenced f1?

    You could do that but that would be a lot of effort, when in fact you don't have to. Take a look at the f2(t) for example, here the period is the same as f1(t), all that is different is f1(t) has been doubled (so you multiply it by 2) and a DC offset has been added (so you add that on too).

    So the relationship is: f2(t)=2f1(t) + pi

    So just apply this to the Fourier series that you're given. Again it's a similar process for the other series', just remember that the period of the other ones isn't the same as f1(t)...so you'll have to accomodate that - i'll let you think about this part yourself! (Hint: try a change of variables t=u*v, where you pick u as appropriate).

    This is how Fourier Series are usually done in practise, from a table or book of basic ones you can apply a few simple changes like this to get quite a large superset.

    Hope this helps anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 192 ✭✭jtiernan


    Thanks a million tdow and michael collins. That has been excellent assistance. I am not sure how to physically multipy and add pie to the series but I will have a go at it and am surely a lot better off than I was. :)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement