lexlip hobby

Rew

There was nothing smart and/or sarcastic said it was all friendly, bare in mind its difficult to access tone when your reading text. He could very well have ment it in the way it was taken by most people hence the clarifactions sought, which were the spirit of educating someone who seemd to know little about gun shops.. Your post is the only antagonistic one in the thread, maybe you should take some of your own advice to heart...

Mufflets

Of course your right.

did you get the tone of that

Rew

Mufflets wrote: »

Of course your right.

did you get the tone of that

LOL, yup, id refer back to my previous post but seems to be pointless.

E. Fudd

Funny that, I never mentioned antagonistic! In my humble opinion there is a difference between antagonistic and sarcastic..... but then again, you know best!

Rew

No but you did mention "argue" and suggested that sparks and my self were antagonistic in this thread.

E. Fudd

As I said....... you know best Rew.

sidneyreilly

pampers wrote: »

As I said....... you know best Rew.

Now..now children:)

Rew

pampers wrote: »

As I said....... you know best Rew.

Great repsonse there really hammering the point home, I concede to your legendary skills of dabate and give in.

To quote someone else

did you get the tone of that

sidneyreilly

Rew wrote: »

Great repsonse there really hammering the point home, I give in.

To quote someone else

I said children means you too Rew:D

E. Fudd

Rew wrote: »

Great repsonse there really hammering the point home, I give in.

Where you being sarcastic or antagonistic there? or both??

sidneyreilly

pampers wrote: »

Where you being sarcastic or antagonistic there? or both??

Oh for f*74ks sake! I give up...

E. Fudd

Ah Syd, I was enjoying that!
Nothing like a good ol' light hearted argument!!!

TBH Rew, I wasn't really that upset, but it just ended up spiralling into this, my apologies!

Time Magazine

Ah lads shut up and just get on would ye? . Let's not go to war.

I think some people (including you, Rew) had a tone of "Oh here's another Joe Duffy listener shocked at guns" in their posts that they may not have been aware of. That's fair enough, ye have to deal with a load of that crap I'm sure. So I acknowledged that you were probably unaware of the way it came across and let you know, in a non-confrontational manner, that you might be jumping the gun (sorry, the puns must be had!) and potentially scaring some people off.

Another comment, one that has been already cited, was noticeably dismissive/confrontational but said by a poster who I have come to judge as more than a bit of an idiotic prick both online and in real-life, was suitably ignored. Members of the community less familiar with how to deal with such posts may not have reacted as such and never returned again.

MortgageMan

Ibid what are you talking about and who are you refering to?

This forum is for shooters to discuss their sport, not for guys to take cheap shots at each other.

School finished a number of years ago:mad:

Rew

This is done and dusted, its a misunderstanding thats spiraling into the abyss.