Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

So it begins..... Torts FE1

  • 24-09-2007 2:54pm
    #1
    Nike_Dude
    Closed Accounts Posts: 269 ✭✭


    So how did everyone find it? I thought it was ok..... apart from the fire alarm going off in the middle of it that is :rolleyes: Anyone else really surprised to see liability for fire getting a whole question??? I'd say anyone that tried to cut out too much was in big trouble. Roll on Company :(


Comments

  • #2
    Font22
    Closed Accounts Posts: 753 ✭✭✭Font22


    first question i looked at was the one on fire liability! so annoyed i didnt learn it, it was only 2 pages in the manual!!!! o well. at least thats one down!


  • #3
    Diddlina
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 ✭Diddlina


    Liability for Fire was a pisser of a question.

    Q1 was on defamation or so I thought but then I got half way through it and began to wonder if VPR were liable for something. Can someone help me out?

    I thought to be honest the whole paper wasnt that nice. I thought Trespass to Land and Nuisance in one paper a bit annoying! Defective premises came up which was to be expected.


  • #4
    jackelle
    Closed Accounts Posts: 30 ✭jackelle


    defamation question - i didn't see anything that they could be liable for. argued for perhaps justification if the fish wasn't fresh and a possibility of the article being fair comment.

    though the rodger/matthew question was designed to trick people

    putting nuisance on instead of rylands wasn't that nice, as was a whole question on fire.

    overall it was a bit of a messy paper.

    did occupiers, defamation, limitations, intentional infliction of suffering and res ipsa


  • #5
    besty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,010 ✭✭✭besty


    Ugh, bit of a disaster for me today. I suppose I didn't really put in enough effort to pass it though. Not gonna make the same mistake with Company though. (I hope)


  • #6
    Tom Young
    Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    Chin up Besty. I am sure you did fine.

    Stay focussed for the others. Remember take time to read questions and all will be well. Tort is one of those areas that people generally feel awful about.

    Good luck!


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    besty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,010 ✭✭✭besty


    Thanks Tom. You never know, I have a nack of pulling rabbits out of hats in exams (well, college anyway) so hopefully some miracle will occur. I'm prepared for the fail though. I'm alot more confident about company, but constitutional is a bit of a punt too I'm afraid.


Advertisement