Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Party Advice

  • 03-09-2007 10:02am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,196 ✭✭✭


    Hi All,

    I've been asked to photograph my brother-in-law's mother & father's 50th Wedding anniversary party in a couple weeks (phew, what a mouthful). There will be about 50 people present and he's looking for a mixture of posed and casual. The venue is a resturant.
    Gear-wise, I have a 30D, 10-20, 24-70 2.8, 70-300 IS and 430Ex. I'd like to get some candids, but am wondering if the 70-300 IS would be fast enough in indoor light? Or would I be better off hiring or borrowing a 70-200 2.8/IS ?

    Thanks in advance for your pearls of wisdom ;)

    Paul


Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    should be grand with your equipment, flash will be used i assume so you dont need overly fast glass


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    You don't always need a long lens to get good candids, especially in a small enough venue. Your 24-70 should be fine for most shots (excluding large group formal shots).

    The best thing would be to have a look at the venue a few days before, and pick out some good spots to place yourself. Normally there is a nice spot or two where you can get a good view of the room. Other than that, just wander around during the evening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,196 ✭✭✭PaulieC


    Thanks, I know the room pretty well -it's close enough to my house that we tend to have a lot of family type events there.
    I think the problem might be that I know about half of the people that will be there and if I get too close the candids just won't be so candid anymore...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,713 ✭✭✭DaireQuinlan


    I'd stick with the two 2.8s, should do the job. 70mm on a 30d is about 100mm equivalent isn't it ? Should be enough stand off distance so that the subjects don't know what you're doing. You'll probably end up shooting at the two extremes. Honestly I wouldn't say that IS is going to stand you in good stead, you'd be amazed just how dark rooms can get. I had my 20-35 2.8 over the weekend at a friends newly bought apartment housewarming, and a roll of 3200 film and even so I was struggling on occasion to get shutter speeds over 1/20th of a second, so if that 70-300 is a 4.5-5.6 then I'd forget about bringing it at all.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,887 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i often shoot stuff like this with a 1.4 and 3200; that may not be an option for you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    Well, if you wanted more candid candids then bring another photographer. You may get another boardsie from here willing to help in exchange for a few pints. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,196 ✭✭✭PaulieC


    Paulw wrote:
    Well, if you wanted more candid candids then bring another photographer. You may get another boardsie from here willing to help in exchange for a few pints. :D
    hehe. I'd be lucky to get a few pints out of it myself !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭rymus


    I'd stick with the 24-70. Without knowing the lighting in the place, I would imagine that the 70-300 is going to be too slow. The 10-20 might be workable if used with the flash. Unless it's a huge venue, a 70-200 IS would probably be overkill. If you can beg or borrow a 50 1.8 or 1.4, that might be useful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,196 ✭✭✭PaulieC


    oh yeah, I have a nifty fifty, completely forgot about that !. That might get a game that night!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭rymus


    nifty fifty is yer only man for that kind of scenario. That and the 24-70 should see you right.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,196 ✭✭✭PaulieC


    Excellent. Thanks for the advice all


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    If I know the people, I'd prefer my 50 1.4 and high iso, if working it, will use flash and 24-70...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,196 ✭✭✭PaulieC


    So I can almost do both things, (1.8 instead of 1.4) but could you explain why you would use one over the other on each situation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    Because people generally want bright images, with catchlights, everyone in focus and vibrant colours if they're hiring a photographer for an event, whereas, if it's something to do with my mates, or family, etc... then I'd prefer work with darker, grainy photos with shallow DOF and whatnot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,196 ✭✭✭PaulieC


    I see, makes sense. Thanks


Advertisement