Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

muscle / fat relationship

  • 29-08-2007 12:54pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭


    Hi,

    Does anyone know the relationship between muscle and fat? Ie., by doing weights (on arms or legs) does the increase in muscle result from fat turning into muscle or from whatever muscle that's there getting bigger?

    Similarly if you are v muscly (eg Arnie) and then stop doing weights, I know the old saying is the muscle turns to fat. Is this really the case, or are they seperate entities? Does the muscle simply lose its size and shrivel a bit, and any fat increase is purely related to overall metabolism / diet / ex etc as opposed to muscles turning into fat when not in use?

    Final q's, does adding muscle through weights (nothing too heavy) generally increase size (eg of arm, assuming arm is semi toned already) or is it merely more lean muscle that isnt bigger, just more defined, and perhaps some fat has been lost also, so overall size actually decreases?

    Just interested in the whole relatipnship and knock-on effects between muscle, fat and size. Any answers would be appreciated. I'm not trying to achieve any particular results myself - I'm just interested in how it really works.

    Thanks,

    Simon


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭tribulus


    Muscle cannot turn to fat.

    Fat cannot turn to muscle.

    Having more muscle can certainly help keep off fat, however if you're eating loads of carbs and saturated fat then fat gain will still occur generally.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,705 ✭✭✭✭Tigger


    tribulus wrote:
    Muscle cannot turn to fat.

    Fat cannot turn to muscle.


    true

    as one ages their metabolisim will sloiw
    if they loose muscle and train less they will be burning far far less calories
    so they will get less muscle aned more fat

    but they are two seperate tjhiongs connected only 'cause they are part of the closed system that is yer body

    here is a good note
    ali.c wrote:
    Hi there,
    To drop your body fat you need to also look at your diet (loads of info in the stickies on this). Excercise wise though, just so you know part of the reason why weight training is advocated when losing weight is that it encourages your body not to get rid of muscle, so its more to maintain the muscle mass you have rather than build it.
    What excercise are best, hmm i would go with whatever you enjoy and something that will get you fit for soccer. I presume that is also one of your goals? i would concentrate more on interval training but through in some endurance work too maybe?
    If you are a member of a gym, transforms program for beginners in the stickies would be a great starting point!

    Ali


    if you however just want to know how to get bigger just eat and eat and eat and lift the most you can
    search hypertrophy to get some info


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    tribulus wrote:
    Muscle cannot turn to fat.

    Fat cannot turn to muscle.

    If a fat person hits the weights big time, but is under eating, will his fat then be used to fuel muscle repair/growth?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,705 ✭✭✭✭Tigger


    Vegeta wrote:
    If a fat person hits the weights big time, but is under eating, will his fat then be used to fuel muscle growth?


    under eating will not help muscle growth

    best thing to do is eat a low fat reasonabaly high protien diet

    then work on the whole general fitness l;evels

    once relativally fit more specialist diet/exercise and realistic targets can be figured out


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Dragan


    rbd wrote:
    best thing to do is eat a low fat reasonabaly high protien diet

    I would disagree and say a diet with a moderate level of healthy fats, high proteins and low carbs would be best.

    But thats just me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    rbd wrote:
    under eating will not help muscle growth

    best thing to do is eat a low fat reasonabaly high protien diet

    then work on the whole general fitness l;evels

    once relativally fit more specialist diet/exercise and realistic targets can be figured out

    Don't worry I am in now way under eating

    So far today

    8am
    60g of porridge with low fat milk
    1 serving of big whey protein shake
    1 slice of white bread (ran out of decent bread) with a nice bit of peanut butter
    creatine
    multivit

    10am
    2 slices wholemeal brown bread with very thin spread of real butter
    pint of milk
    apple
    usually handful of nuts here

    1pm canteen meal
    sirloin steak
    1 baked potatoe
    scoop of cabbage
    scoop of sweetcorn
    pint of milk

    I am just wondering when I am finished my bulk (have put on some weight lately, hope there's a lot of muscle under there) when I decide to shed the excess flab will it be any use i.e. while on calorie defecit will my body use hte stored fat to repair and build muscle


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,705 ✭✭✭✭Tigger


    Dragan wrote:
    I would disagree and say a diet with a moderate level of healthy fats, high proteins and low carbs would be best.

    But thats just me.

    steps aside
    lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭TKD SC


    Thanks for the replies everyone. Interesting, and good to get confirmation re fat & muscle.
    One last q's was in relation to size. Eg, if you do let say extra weights on your leg (that you havent done before), and assuming you maintain the rest of your exercise regime / eating regime etc as normal; what would happen the size of your leg: bigger or smaller (more compact)?

    My guess is that you are not really going to lose any fat from your leg as maintaining normal ex and eating routine. Therefore, the only new thing effecting your leg is weights and hence extra work on your leg muscles. As your leg muscles get stronger, I presume that means the muscles do actually get bigger. The only reason I could see them getting smaller (compact) might be to do with LEAN muscle?? Ie., your leg muscle is getting worked, and it turns to lean muscle which is smaller? than your regular old muscle? Sounds a bit weird to me though, could anyone confirm? And anyone have a definition of "lean muscle", or is it just a phrase and no real difference to plain old muscle?

    Thanks again,

    Simon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭TKD SC


    tribulus wrote:
    Muscle cannot turn to fat.

    Fat cannot turn to muscle.

    QUOTE]
    You learn something new everyday! Good to know, always wondered about that! So, doing sit-ups wont actually turn your big fat belly into a big hard fat/muscle belly like people always say! It will just work your muscles underneath your fat and not effect the fat at all. Or that "muscle will turn to fat" that people also say alot.

    I'd like to point out I dont have a big fat belly :):)


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,689 Mod ✭✭✭✭stevenmu


    Vegeta wrote:
    I am just wondering when I am finished my bulk (have put on some weight lately, hope there's a lot of muscle under there) when I decide to shed the excess flab will it be any use i.e. while on calorie defecit will my body use hte stored fat to repair and build muscle
    In short, no. The fat is stored by your body so it can be burnt for energy if you aren't taking in enough calories through carbs. It can not be used to build muscle, that's what protein is for and afaik this isn't stored by your body in any real meaningful way.

    The reason people think that body fats convert into muscle is because as you start to excersise you burn a lot more calories, and if you don't increase your calorie intake your body will be forced to consume it's store of body fats to produce energy. Also because as your muscle mass increases you automatically use more calories even when not counting the excersise, again forcing your body to consume body fats. Two important things to note are that
    A: Protein is what 'builds' muscle, when excersising you must be consuming enoug proteins to build up your muscle mass (and more importantly to repair the damage that excersise does to your muscles)
    B: Body fat is merely your body's energy reserve. To lose it take in less calories than you use (but not drasticly less :) ), to put it on take in more calories than you use.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    tribulus wrote:
    Fat cannot turn to muscle.

    You could burn off the fat while chasing down and killing the mammoth that you then ate which gave you the protein to build more muscle. ;)


Advertisement