Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Performance Testing My PC . . .

  • 10-08-2007 9:23am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 394 ✭✭


    My system is late 2001 Dell Dimension 4300 / P4 / 1.6 GHz / nVidia GeForce2 MX/MX400 (64 MB, I think).
    I recently fattened up my RAM (PC133) from 256 MB to 1024 MB.
    Apart from the application (Olympus Master2) that manages the digital photos and some small improvement in quicker Google Earth opening, I see very little difference in speed.
    I do not presently use RAM hungry applications so that may explain the lack of noticeable improvement. Soon I'll be looking at a new CAD pack, where available RAM will be a brake on things.

    I've tried downloading some small freeware benchmarking applications.
    But they tell me very little, as the baseline comparisions data module is not part of the freeware !
    Is there any benchmark application simple and not too big that will rank my PC's performance in terms of CPU speed, graphics speed and overall performance alongside defined present-day systems ?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,757 ✭✭✭8T8


    Everest or Sisoft sandra do that but largely with synthetic tests outside of the standard of pictures/office/internet any modern PC will be substantially faster than your current one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,537 ✭✭✭SickBoy


    On top of what 8T8 suggested I would recommend PCMark as it's a bit more real world performance instead of just synthetic benchmarks...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 394 ✭✭tak


    PC Mark is not freeware, though.:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,537 ✭✭✭SickBoy


    tak wrote:
    PC Mark is not freeware, though.:(
    Yes it is. You just have to pay for the advanced features which are not required to run the benchmark...


Advertisement