Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What am i doing wrong

  • 06-08-2007 5:27pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 198 ✭✭


    i spent a lot of time over the weekend taking close ups (canon 100mm macro with ef25 tube using tripod) of photos.

    i lot of the colour / exposure on them are completely crap, i normally set the camera (canon 5d) to aperture and use f2.8 and let the camera worry about the other settings

    ive attached one of the worst ones for the kind boards members can throw up some ideas.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,063 ✭✭✭GristlyEnd


    You are going to have a very small depth of field with an extension tube on a macro lens and f/2.8.

    Did you shoot in RAW. If so what did you use for converting them to JPEG?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 198 ✭✭feileacan


    shot in raw - the image is converted to a jpeg - this one had no alterations

    the colours seem completely 'blown'

    i use aperture on mac


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    You've blown out the red channel alright.
    What metering mode did you use?
    The camera, I guess, meters on the luminance of the scene not the specific colour content so when you shot in Av mode the camera may have over done it.
    Especially if you used a metering mode other than spot or center weighted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 198 ✭✭feileacan


    the camera has evaluative, partial, spot and centre weighted.

    i always have it set on evaluative.

    i will try and use spot and centre from now on

    something i never thought of.

    cheers


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    You can always check the histogram after you shoot to make sure you've no blown out highlights. Drop the exposure compensation a bit to correct.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,624 ✭✭✭✭Fajitas!


    Would agree with using the spot metering if you're using natural light, however, (and if you have a flash, and get an off camera cord) why don't you consider using off camera flash - it'll make an unbeliveable difference to your macro shots.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34 leakd


    I don't see anything wrong with the exposure on this picture, but I think you set the white balance too low... If you set it higher, the picture will look warmer and the colours will look better (IMHO).


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Look at the individual colour channels, the red one is blown.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 214 ✭✭Duchovny


    What ISO are you using? What about the light arround? was it good?

    Are you trying to use manual or auto focus??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 198 ✭✭feileacan


    Duchovny

    ISO was 200, light was sunny but intermittent rain

    the lens / tube does not allow auto-f

    seems the red was blown

    leakd

    will try altering the white balance a little bit next time but chaning the colour temp does not seem to make a difference

    thanks everyone


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,063 ✭✭✭GristlyEnd


    Did you get Canon RAW software with the camera? try that. I use Capture NX for my RAW's as the CS3 profile for the D200 is not the best.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,185 ✭✭✭nilhg


    DarrenG wrote:
    I use Capture NX for my RAW's as the CS3 profile for the D200 is not the best.

    Darren just for interests sake, did you (or anyone) try the presets i posted a link to in the digital darkroom forum, they seem to have got a good reaction on the adobe forums.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,063 ✭✭✭GristlyEnd


    nilhg wrote:
    Darren just for interests sake, did you (or anyone) try the presets i posted a link to in the digital darkroom forum, they seem to have got a good reaction on the adobe forums.

    Just tried it out in CS3. A bit better but still not as good as Capture NX. I don't have lightroom to try it out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,185 ✭✭✭nilhg


    DarrenG wrote:
    Just tried it out in CS3. A bit better but still not as good as Capture NX. I don't have lightroom to try it out.


    Thanks Darren, the situation is similar with Olympus, but the Oly software sucks so the profiles speedup things slightly in LR.

    Sorry for hijacking the thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 313 ✭✭haz


    feileacan wrote:
    i spent a lot of time over the weekend taking close ups (canon 100mm macro with ef25 tube using tripod) of photos.

    When you write "close ups .. of photos", you mean you are enlarging a printed photograph using the macro lens? If so, then it could be the print that is at fault, even if it looks good. A daylight-balanced lightbox under the negative would give more dynamic range.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 214 ✭✭Duchovny


    Well analysing your photo again, and comparing with one of my own i see that probably you focus the midle of the flower, and not the all flower, the flower is not all focus as we can see, and that causes the color to fade a bit... try to dont get yourself so close and dont focus one point in the picture but focus the all lot and see if it helps...

    http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/17830118/


Advertisement