Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest
What kind of wrestling booker are you?
-
06-08-2007 1:15pm#1Take the one minute test here: http://www.talkpw.com/wrestlescale
Just a bit of fun but heres what I got:
You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy.
Most similar booker: Jim Cornette
Most similar promotion: ROH 2007
You can copy and paste your results and the coding needed for it at the bottom of the results page.0
Comments
-
You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: WCW 1993
Probably would have got the same score as Vince had I chosen the four horsemen over the NWO.0 -
You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: TNA 2005
Right, so it's telling me i have Heymans mind, but Vince Russo's booking power?
Now i'm really f*cking confused!
VR!0 -
-
You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: ECW 1996
That result is not at all suprising, ECW in 1996
0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
Wrestlescale - Results
You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: TNA 20020 -
-
-
Wrestlescale - Results
You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.
Most similar booker: Jim Cornette
Most similar promotion: ROH 2007
Doesn't surprise me too much!0 -
Advertisement
-
That sounds about rightWrestlescale - Results
You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.
Most similar booker: Jim Cornette
Most similar promotion: ROH 2005
0 -
Bubs101 wrote:I'm a bit worried
You are a moderate believer in sports-entertainment. You reject the idea of old-school wrestling but believe that wrestling ability still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that charisma must always take priority.
Most similar booker: Vince McMahon
Most similar promotion: WWE 2007
I wouldn't be too worried, You may stand a chance of getting employed by WWE which will most likely still be going in another 25 years time, I doubt TNA and ROH will have that assurance, ESPECIALLY TNA if they lose their backer!
VR!0 -
b]Wrestlescale - Results[/b]
You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: TNA 2002
Interesting enough... although a lot of the questions would depend on what promotion you are considering... For instance if you were booking ROH obviously the live crowd would be most important but for TNA it would be TV viewers that matter most. Good bit of fun though!0 -
Wrestlescale - Results
You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new.
Most similar booker: Eric Bischoff
Most similar promotion: WCW 1996
TNA 2002 Seems very popular0 -
Wrestlescale - Results
You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: WCW 1993
Is that a good thing?0 -
Wrestlescale - Results
You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: WCW 19930 -
-
-
demanufactured wrote:Wrestlescale - Results
You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: WCW 1993
0 -
Wrestlescale - Results
You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: ECW 19960 -
Advertisement
-
Wrestlescale - Results
You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: TNA 2002
Right smack bang in the middle, happy enough about that.:D0 -
-
Wrestlescale - Results
You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: ECW 1998
Kinda expected something like that.0 -
Wrestlescale - Results
You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: TNA 2005
Seems like most people think like Heyman. Not too bad I guess. TNA was good in 2005 I suppose.0 -
Wrestlescale - Results
You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority.
Most similar booker: Jim Cornette
Most similar promotion: ROH 20070 -
-
Wrestlescale - Results
You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: ECW 1996
What I think, I tend to be moderate about most issues!0 -
Wrestlescale - Results
You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: ECW 1998
Looks like me and Minto need to be brought over to the Sci-Fi network pronto. :cool:0 -
rossie1977 wrote:
You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: ECW 1996
That result is not at all suprising, ECW in 1996
Same0 -
Advertisement
-
You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy.
Most similar booker: Jim Cornette
Most similar promotion: ROH 20070 -
Mr.Nice Guy wrote:Wrestlescale - Results
You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new.
Most similar booker: Paul Heyman
Most similar promotion: ECW 1998
Looks like me and Minto need to be brought over to the Sci-Fi network pronto. :cool:
So that the brand/promotion can go bust in less than three years later!
VR!0 -
validreasoning! wrote:So that the brand/promotion can go bust in less than three years later!
VR!
I'll just blame Minto. 0 -
-
Minto wrote:Hold on! Hold on!
It wasn't (or won't be) MY fault, lol!
You can both horribly manage the promotion, pay your workers with bouncing cheques, not provide visas for workers and accept cheques from your competition and do occasional talent exchanges.
And then when it all blows up, you guys can always blame Vinny Mac, everyone else does
VR!0
Advertisement