Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Petrol quality - Is there a difference between petrol stations?

  • 03-08-2007 2:43pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 238 ✭✭


    Some people swear by one company and others by another.
    But is there actually any difference in the quality of petrol
    depending on the station ie Texaco, Statoil, Campus, Maxol, Shell, Esso???????

    If there is a difference how can you tell?


Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,229 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Each company adds additives to the raw fuel after it arrives in the terminal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭Tipsy Mac


    For quality always buy from a station with a quick turnaround of fuel, this limits the possibility of contamination from fuel lying in tanks for weeks/months.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,077 ✭✭✭✭Esel
    Not Your Ornery Onager


    Tipsy Mac wrote:
    For quality always buy from a station with a quick turnaround of fuel, this limits the possibility of contamination from fuel lying in tanks for weeks/months.
    Like Statoil on Usher's Island!

    Know it's been discussed before, but is Shell V-Power worth the extra 5c per litre?

    Not your ornery onager



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 570 ✭✭✭BrandonBlock


    in Ireland it's a complete ripoff because it's the same fuel as octane 95. In the UK and some other countries it's 98-99 though. Australia is 100.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    This is because of higher tax on fuel over 95 octane right?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,272 ✭✭✭✭Atomic Pineapple


    in Ireland it's a complete ripoff because it's the same fuel as octane 95. In the UK and some other countries it's 98-99 though. Australia is 100.

    shell v power is still only 95ron here?? ah damn

    anybody know any petrol stations that supply 97ron or above petrol?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,360 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    draffodx wrote:
    shell v power is still only 95ron here?? ah damn

    anybody know any petrol stations that supply 97ron or above petrol?

    Almost impossible to get 97ron in the Republic, all those performance Jap imports like Evos or WRXs have to be retunned to run on 95ron down here so they loose a few bhp in the process afaik.

    97ron a bit more common over the border though afaik.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,272 ✭✭✭✭Atomic Pineapple


    bazz26 wrote:
    Almost impossible to get 97ron in the Republic, all those performance Jap imports like Evos or WRXs have to be retunned to run on 95ron down here so they loose a few bhp in the process afaik.

    97ron a bit more common over the border though afaik.


    bloody republic!!!!!!!

    I need 98ron to run a Accord Type R when i get one, better start stocking up on octane booster

    As for the quality of petrol of one company versus an other, would better quality fuel get you more miles out of your tank?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    draffodx wrote:
    I need 98ron to run a Accord Type R when i get one,
    I think the ecu should be able to adapt to 95ron. You will lose some bhp though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,272 ✭✭✭✭Atomic Pineapple


    tuxy wrote:
    I think the ecu should be able to adapt to 95ron. You will lose some bhp though.

    alot of people have reported serious problems running them on 95ron especially the 99/00 pre face lift model


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 232 ✭✭richie_rvf


    Shell V Power is the same rating but each time I use it I get more miles to a tank, I NEVER get over 300 miles normally but I always get over 300 when I use V Power - like 310 to 315.

    Other than that I can't tell any difference.

    I also filled up with 99RON V Power in Co. Down and didn't really notice any difference in performance.

    Richie.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,605 ✭✭✭cpoh1


    draffodx wrote:
    alot of people have reported serious problems running them on 95ron especially the 99/00 pre face lift model

    Theyre telling fibs so they are! All hondas have a built in knock sensor which retards the timing to adjust to the lower grade fuel. I had an old preldue typeS which ran perfectly on 95 unleaded and that had a very similar engine in it to the accrod typeR.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    richie_rvf wrote:
    I also filled up with 99RON V Power in Co. Down and didn't really notice any difference in performance.
    Why would it give different performance?
    Unless you are running a performance car that is used to 99ron it will compress 99ron the same as it was 95ron.


Advertisement