Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Damp Proof Course

  • 12-07-2007 7:25am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 730 ✭✭✭


    Does anyone know if there are any regulations regarding what level below DPC external finished ground levels should be at?

    The problem is, a friend is having some paving done in the back garden and the contractor is insisting that he can have the finished paving level 15mm below DPC. I would have thought that this was too little. He is also creating a fall towards the building to use existing rainwater gullys as drainage so this would add to the problem if gullys ever became overwhelmed.

    I have done a bit of paving (DIY) in my time and would always ensure that at least 100mm gap between the top of the paving and the DPC level to prevent damp from rain splash and moderate flooding from entering the building above the DPC line.

    I've spoken to this contractor about the concerns and he assures me that 15mm is plenty and this is the way it has always been done. He has being doing it for six years apparently :eek: If it was me I would have got rid of hm straight away but he is a friend of a friend so the customer is reluctant to rock the boat until I can prove my point.

    Am I deluded or does anyone have a source for professional guidelines on this matter? Is what he is doing common practice?

    Maybe this is better suited to DIY but I'll let the mods decide.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,676 ✭✭✭✭smashey


    Try 150mm.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 730 ✭✭✭squire1


    Yes 150mm, Sorry, mistype.

    Yeah, that's what I understood the "Best Practice" to be but I cannot find anything "official" that states it. It's on a few paving websites and I'm fairly sure it's in the British building regs. Is it in the Irish Building regs?

    The problem I have is that the guy is trying to convince both myself and my mate that I am wrong. He's quoted for this work assuming he would not be doing any digging out but if he does it "my" way, he'll have to dig out 9m3 of soil, so obviously, he is trying to avoid that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,676 ✭✭✭✭smashey


    Technical Guidance Document C (TGD C) states 150mm minimum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 730 ✭✭✭squire1


    Problem sorted, my mate came to his senses and told the guy to sling his hook. Jeez, I hate cowboy contractors. :mad:

    Thanks smashey


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭paulmallon


    you surely mean 15 centimetres?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 730 ✭✭✭squire1


    Nope, 1.5cm below DPC. I kid you not.

    I've since had two different experienced builders tell me that it is fairly common practice with a lot of paving contractors. I also rang a major paving contractor and asked how they do it and they said that once it is below DPC it dosen't matter. When TGD C (as sourced by smashey) was pointed out to them they said "ah sure, that's just for builders, it dosen't apply to us"

    So be aware.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,822 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    yes, but you need to bear in mind that paving or cobble lock is permeable, not impermeable, so it is not the same as having a concrete path 15mm down from your DPC, as no water will sit on it anyway.

    Under the Part M guidelines, 15mm is the size mentioned for the max size of step at door threshold..............is that why your guy has this figure in his head, from doing previous door thresholds???

    So, technically, at door thresholds, Part M goes against the advice of Part C.
    Why doesn't something like this surprise me...........?

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,676 ✭✭✭✭smashey


    galwaytt wrote:
    yes, but you need to bear in mind that paving or cobble lock is permeable, not impermeable, so it is not the same as having a concrete path 15mm down from your DPC, as no water will sit on it anyway.

    Under the Part M guidelines, 15mm is the size mentioned for the max size of step at door threshold..............is that why your guy has this figure in his head, from doing previous door thresholds???

    So, technically, at door thresholds, Part M goes against the advice of Part C.
    Why doesn't something like this surprise me...........?

    :D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,550 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    galwaytt wrote:
    yes, but you need to bear in mind that paving or cobble lock is permeable, not impermeable, so it is not the same as having a concrete path 15mm down from your DPC, as no water will sit on it anyway.

    Under the Part M guidelines, 15mm is the size mentioned for the max size of step at door threshold..............is that why your guy has this figure in his head, from doing previous door thresholds???

    So, technically, at door thresholds, Part M goes against the advice of Part C.
    Why doesn't something like this surprise me...........?
    Threshold detailing is completely different from wall DPC detailing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 730 ✭✭✭squire1


    No he insisted that the paving would be 15mm below the DPC along the 15m interface between paving and building with no slope/ramp up to the double patio doors.

    The paving is permeable to a cetrain extent but that is assuming there is natural drainage in the ground. Like anything else if it becomes saturated......if the gullies are blocked.......where would the water from 60M2 of paving falling towards the building go?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement