Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Qualplex in concrete

  • 03-07-2007 11:29pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 41


    Our plumber just laid all the qualplex pipes that are going to be buried
    in the concrete floor. He didn't use any insulation on the pipes - Is that
    standard practice or should he have insulated them?

    John


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    He should have used the type with the black corrugated sleeving.
    Did he use this?
    I would strongly recommend the use of this as it allows cracks to form in the concrete without damaging the qualpex.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41 John1000


    Thats what he used alright. That's ok without any insulation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    Should be OK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 419 ✭✭eoghan.geraghty


    It may well be standard practice, but it is also obviously wasting heat to the concrete floor.
    If you want insulated pipes buried you must be prepared to pay the extra for them, as you didn't specify it and no plumber will price for it unless spec'd.
    I was attending a seminar on energy efficiency recently where the lecturer claimed 1m of uninsulated 3/4" copper pipe emitted the same heat as 1 sq foot of rad, I don't have an equivalent figure for qualpex.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,669 ✭✭✭mukki


    It may well be standard practice, but it is also obviously wasting heat to the concrete floor.
    If you want insulated pipes buried you must be prepared to pay the extra for them, as you didn't specify it and no plumber will price for it unless spec'd.
    I was attending a seminar on energy efficiency recently where the lecturer claimed 1m of uninsulated 3/4" copper pipe emitted the same heat as 1 sq foot of rad, I don't have an equivalent figure for qualpex.


    but the pipes are laid above the floor insulation, so any heat lost will warm the concrete (pity the pipes are usually laid so close to the outer walls)

    so you really would only want the pipes that heat the water tank to be insulated


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 419 ✭✭eoghan.geraghty


    mukki wrote:
    but the pipes are laid above the floor insulation, so any heat lost will warm the concrete (pity the pipes are usually laid so close to the outer walls)

    so you really would only want the pipes that heat the water tank to be insulated

    This is still a waste of energy. John 1000 never mentioned any floor insulation either.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I laid my pipes between layers of insulation under the (UFH) floor, or more precisly I laid ducting then inserted the water pipes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41 John1000


    The way the floor is being constructed is

    more concrete
    ufh pipes
    insulation
    concrete subfloor
    radon barrier

    The pipes were put in the subfloor so any heat lost from the pipes is wasted.
    Puting some of the pipes in the ufh insulation sounds like a good idea.


Advertisement