What i think WWE Needs!

kentonbomb

it needs to belike it was in 1993-1995 good storylines, good matches, good gimmicks (rick martel, issac yankem, waylon mercy, doink etc.) Sure they wern't that good of gimmicks but what i mean is WWE needs loads more characthers, like a police man, a guru, a politition etc.

If you could add and remove things from WWE what would you do?

Mr.Nice Guy

kentonbomb wrote:

it needs to belike it was in 1993-1995 good storylines, good matches, good gimmicks (rick martel, issac yankem, waylon mercy, doink etc.) Sure they wern't that good of gimmicks but what i mean is WWE needs loads more characthers, like a police man, a guru, a politition etc.

If you could add and remove things from WWE what would you do?

Are you serious? That's the dumb sh*t that had them in dire straits. Their boom years were when they moved away from that gimmicky crap.

Minto

I think the WWE needs simple storylines. Simple!

thecutter

I think the Op has a point... But I would say more like mid to late 90's
Interesting characters such as The Godfather & Goldust. The mid-carders actually played a good part on Raw.
IMO the introduction of seperate brands has ruined it

krudler

kentonbomb wrote:

it needs to belike it was in 1993-1995 good storylines, good matches, good gimmicks (rick martel, issac yankem, waylon mercy, doink etc.) Sure they wern't that good of gimmicks but what i mean is WWE needs loads more characthers, like a police man, a guru, a politition etc.

If you could add and remove things from WWE what would you do?

are you ****ing insane? they were the worst years ever in the wwf, they sucked! make it more ault orientated like it was in 97-2001,the attitude years were ****ing glorious,a great time to be a wrestling fan

Mossy Monk

The Attitude era, it will never be replicated.

The Volt

Bring back the Mcmahon Helmsley regime

littlejp

I think a clearer ranking system for all the wrestlers might be a good idea. Wrestlers should climb and drop in rankings when they win or lose. It would make regular matches more important and interesting.

The Volt

Like in WWF Smackdown for the Ps1?

haha

ec18

Bring back the style of the atitude era and get rid of the tri brand. Get rid of ECW altogether and trim the rosters. Get rid of the fat........put more emphasis on the buildup to the match and allow for more promos in a feud....rather than a couple of match interferences

d1sc0g1rl

I definally think they should put it all back together and make it more like the attitude era.

demanufactured

Bring back WCW circa 96-99



nWo-4Life

Ruu_Old

demanufactured wrote:

Bring back WCW circa 96-99



nWo-4Life

oWn please, only he can help us now.

ec18

bring back nash, hogan and hall....yeah great idea:P

demanufactured

not wxactly bring THEM back , but do something totally unexpected and radical

tdv

Bring back I.R.S. There's too many tax cheats in the WWE nowadays.

Proxy

I want more toughness. Someone you could actually believe *might* hurt you if you asked for an autograph. A badass. John Cena is a friggin' girl. Remember the Stone Cold/McMahon feud. A man's man to lead the company! (and I don't mean Steve Regal:p)

ShawnRaven

kentonbomb wrote:

it needs to belike it was in 1993-1995 good storylines, good matches, good gimmicks (rick martel, issac yankem, waylon mercy, doink etc.) Sure they wern't that good of gimmicks but what i mean is WWE needs loads more characthers, like a police man, a guru, a politition etc.

If you could add and remove things from WWE what would you do?

Oh dear christ, have you any f*cking clue how moronic you sound. Let me point out a few.

1) Iassac Yankem (I. Yankem, I yank em). I think he's quite happy being former 1 time WWE champion Kane, something he'd never have gotten being Jerry Lawlers evil dentist of doom!

2) Waylon Mercy, who was on his last legs as a half decent worker at the time he was brought in. Danny Spivey had way better matches in his WWE time in 85-86 as well as in WCW as one half of the skyscrapers

3) Doink as a character was pretty cool brought in at the end of 1992 being a take on Pennywise, the clown from Stephen Kings IT. He was great as an evil character, especially when there were two of them f*cking with Crush. But he got turned shortly after Crush was taken off TV and went rapidly downhill from there. How the hell can you justify his face run?

4) Rick Martel had gotten a couple of tag title runs with different partners, but was long past his prime by the time 1993 rolled around, and thats coming from a big Rick Martel mark from his AWA days.

WWE doesn't need cheesy gimmick cartoon style characters, it's fine characterwise, in fact thats whats killing WWE atm, how many of us actually took Kevin Thorn seriously in the debut of ECW on Sci Fi? And who really gives a rats about the Boogeyman, or those two Grease rip-offs?

Go back and watch Wrestlemania III for Savage v Steamboat and watch the recap of what lead to it. Because it's what WWE needs again. I believe Ph3n0m stated that a few weeks back too.

VR!

Fozzy

VR, there's no need to be insulting in getting your point across

To be honest, I don't think WWE needs anything different from what they have now. They've got plenty of people watching, plenty of people buying their merchandise, and while there's always room for improvement I just think that what they're doing now pleases the majority of their fans

I think a bigger emphasis on the cruisers would work though. It should be more like in MMA, where you don't have to compare the smaller guys with the bigger guys. The smaller guys just stick to their own division and the best small guys are still some of the toughest around. If they just kept the cruisers separate from the heavyweights then everyone would accept them as great wrestlers rather than guys that lose to big guys every time

Vince135792003

What does the WWE need? Real competition.

AlphaMale 3OO

validreasoning! wrote:

WWE doesn't need cheesy gimmick cartoon style characters, it's fine characterwise, in fact thats whats killing WWE atm, how many of us actually took Kevin Thorn seriously in the debut of ECW on Sci Fi? And who really gives a rats about the Boogeyman, or those two Grease rip-offs?

VR!

I think Boogey and Kevin Thorn are ok as they are serious charachters. But Deuce and Domino are ridiculous and the charachter of Eugene is a complete fcuking embarassment, obviously to appeal to children, which I doubt he even does. Shame because he's a decent worker. Shawn Michaels in his book said that what he thought killed the WWF in the mid 90's was the presence of ridiculous 'job' gimmicks like a policeman, a dentist a garbage man etc. Anyone remember the Mountie? He was pretty funny but him and the rest of these charachters should be consigned to history and never be rekindled.

ShawnRaven

forbesii wrote:

I think Boogey and Kevin Thorn are ok as they are serious charachters. But Deuce and Domino are ridiculous and the charachter of Eugene is a complete fcuking embarassment, obviously to appeal to children, which I doubt he even does. Shame because he's a decent worker. Shawn Michaels in his book said that what he thought killed the WWF in the mid 90's was the presence of ridiculous 'job' gimmicks like a policeman, a dentist a garbage man etc. Anyone remember the Mountie? He was pretty funny but him and the rest of these charachters should be consigned to history and never be rekindled.

Problem with the Mountie was that after the jailhouse match, there really was nowhere for him to go except for being a transition IC champion, which is why they ended up pairing him up with Oulette. A good cop/bad cop match wasn't as bad as it sounded in 1991. It was a lot more interesting than Earthquake making Quakeburgers.

I'll also agree with Eugene as well, Nick Dinsmore is a hell of a worker but sadly he plays the retard gimmick so well so they'll keep it.

VR!

bombidol

VR watch that insulting.

ShawnRaven

bombidol wrote:

VR watch that insulting.

Huh? Whatcha talkin bout Willis? Fozzy already pointed out this already, no need to add your spoke too.

VR!