Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Does precedent count for anything in planning?

  • 31-05-2007 9:58pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,413 ✭✭✭


    Trying to settle a discussion.... If you're building something that is quite different from the norm, does the existence of a precedent make it any more or less likely to get approval? Or does it make no difference whatsoever?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Depends on where it is been built and how it is "different" and what the norm is, explain a little more detail and we may be able to help you


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 710 ✭✭✭Dundhoone


    Imo precedent has nothing to do with planning decisions. The most recent planning legislation/guidelines and area development plan , and after that the planners discretion.

    I have experience of a situation where a planner made a decision/ demanded significant revisions to a house. A different planner then granted permission the neighbours house, and ignored all the conditions which had been set on the first house.

    Precedent is nothing , except maybe in terms of building a 2 story house in a row of bungalows!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,822 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    actually, it does have value.

    Take for instance the case of old houses being bought, sometimes in ruins, to 'do up'. For years, all you could do was re-model using maybe existing facades, or walls, or some such. This used to annoyl the crap out of people who'd prefer to just build a new structure on the footprint of the old.

    Now however, on foot a recent Bord Pleanala decision, there is precedent for 'replacement' building, which means you aren't necessarily tied to the old building...........this 'precedent' is very valuable, and quite legitimate.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭One Cold Hand


    Well it definately won't make it less likely.

    It will help in the majority of cases. (It may not help enough to grant the permission, but thats a different issue!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,552 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    There is no such thing as precedent within the Planning & development Acts. However planning authorities frown upon the word if it is used in an argument against them. But when it suits them they can refuse an application for permission based on the idea that it "would set an undesirable precedent"

    As was stated above the OP should post up more specific details


  • Advertisement
Advertisement