Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"The" bands just good marketing?

  • 28-05-2007 11:56pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 518 ✭✭✭


    I noticed while growing up when I used to read obscure music forums and The Vibe on teletext (!) that every year around janurary to may (not always this time) there is a new "brilliant" band that is "so much better than the tripe on the charts at the moment" but are "obscure". The band members have cockney, geordie, yarkshire, scouser or manchester accents or some strong accent, have "the" in their name, sing about working class life and have 2 catchy songs with a killer riff and quirky but cool lyrics. Weirdly, enough, by the end of the year this band have one or more top ten hits, are nominated for 20 billion brit awards and the same people who liked them for obscurity hate them now except a few. Then the bands either fade out of the mainstream (Kasabian, franz ferdinand (probably cos they have no "the" in their name)), or end up having an exact same second album (snow patril, monkeys). Someone get rid of these bands before Editors and the view become the next big thing.

    Is this a way for record companies to get through to the sort of anti mainstreamers? By creating word of mouth and hyping them up and marketing them as "cool" and "so NOT spice girls"?

    And also i didn't give great examples, I can provide later. Am I just stating the obvious here?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭pbsuxok1znja4r


    Definitely just stating the obvious.
    Here's a tip, though. Don't listen to the radio. Don't listen to magazine. Don't listen to what's on T.V.

    TBH it only takes a listen or two to find out if a band is really "brilliant", so people who go in for these hyped bands have of course heard them and are obviously just happy to consume what they're being fed, etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    Obvious.

    The whole alternative rock thing is just pop dressed up for people who don't want to believe they're listening to pop. It's the same simple songs and catchy choruses that Britney and the likes have, and they just go through the same phases as pop, with bands being the next big thing one moment, and gone the next.

    A rose by any other name...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 78 ✭✭Captain Smiggy


    A rose by any other name...

    Sums it up exactly, Whats so bad about pop anyway? Beach boys were pop. The Pipettes are pop. There's nothing wrong with being accessible.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    There's nothing wrong with being accessible.

    Accessible has become a formulae. A particular structure of verse/chorus/verse. It's all about writing a song for the sheer sake of making something that'll sell, not about making music for the love of it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 310 ✭✭Spectator#1


    I love bands that come out in January.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,455 ✭✭✭weemcd


    fúcking A dudes, alternative baby \m/:D\m/ :rolleyes:

    Duffin%20sing.jpg


Advertisement