Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

PD's Demise Premature?

  • 20-05-2007 11:23am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 43


    I'm not fan of the PD's but I think reports of their demise are premature.

    How many seats can they realistically expect this time? Do they have the party structures to make a comeback? What are your strenghts (voter appeal) and weaknesses? Would a more complete elucidation of its underlying philosophy help the cause? A setback isn't necessarily a bad thing. It's a good time for reflection. Well, any PD'ers tell us their thinking.
    (P.S. Of course, they may surprise us all on Thrusday). (P.P.S. Others please don't use question for childish party bashing.)


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ateam


    I think McDowell and Harney are certainties to get seats. Parlon and Liz O'Donnell are in with a chance. The other four are in real danger. Difficult to judge PD party because although they may be unpopular nationally in opinion polls, they attract transfers from Fianna Fail voters and put forward strong local candidates.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,247 Mod ✭✭✭✭flogen


    I think realistically they should expect no more than 4 seats.

    While the national opinion polls aren't really fair on a small party like the PDs, they do show a halving of their 1st pref percentage on last year, and a lot of their seats (Parlon's included) were taken from a collapsed FG in 2002 - a trend which will be reversed in many areas although probably not completely.

    If they lose Parlon it'll be a bit of a blow - he's party president of course. RTÉ have said O'Donnell has the fight of her political life too, and that would be a major blow as she's quite a prominent party member. McDowell has never managed to get re-elected but he's never held a ministerial post before 2002, nor has he been a party leader, so I expect him to get in (but perhaps with more of a fight).

    As ateam says it's not exactly a bad thing for the party as a whole - they have failed to get their ideology across and don't seem to have the structures of other parties, even small ones like them. It'll be a dig to the ego of McDowell to see his party halve in representation and almost certainly hit the backbenches just months after he took the mantle, though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,148 ✭✭✭✭Raskolnikov


    joecoote wrote:
    How many seats can they realistically expect this time?
    Two should be safe, Harney and McDowell. Two are almost certainly gone, F. O' Malley and Sexton. The other four are battlegrounds, I think the PD's will do well to take two out of the four.

    So the PD's will be doing well to take four seats this election.
    joecoote wrote:
    Do they have the party structures to make a comeback?
    Quite frankly, the answer is no.
    joecoote wrote:
    What are your strenghts (voter appeal) and weaknesses?
    Harney and McDowell are both highly capable politicians. But because McDowell can't keep his mouth shut; he's generated a lot of anti-PD sentiment in the general public. Health is a poisoned chalice. Anyone who takes that portfolio seems to take a kicking.
    joecoote wrote:
    Would a more complete elucidation of its underlying philosophy help the cause?
    Yes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    That turkey is cooked. Stick a fork in it. The Minister for Health will lose her seat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    The PDs always, always surprise at elections. They will loose some, and gain others. I'd be very surprised if it gets as low as four.
    Thing is, when it comes to crunch time, enough people tend to realise that there is only one party, in all of Ireland, that will say things like "profit is not a dirty word" and "some inequality is nessacery", and we need at least one party that will say this.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 915 ✭✭✭ArthurDent


    On the ground in D Mid West feeling is Ms Harey will be lucky to scrape in on the 4th seat. Ist seat will go to Curran, second to Gogarty and a serious battle between Harney, Tuffy, Keating and Spain for the last two. She won't poll v well in Lucan and may be left depending on transfers from Spain and Keating .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 BillFarkinAllen


    The PDs always, always surprise at elections. They will loose some, and gain others. I'd be very surprised if it gets as low as four.
    Thing is, when it comes to crunch time, enough people tend to realise that there is only one party, in all of Ireland, that will say things like "profit is not a dirty word" and "some inequality is nessacery", and we need at least one party that will say this.


    Hi Minister
    I agree tbh. Written off at the last election too they were:rolleyes: If anything I reckon Sinn Fein may have the most disappointing vote next to the Greens. The PD's will lose seats but its a question of how many. It could be just 1 or it could be even 4 but they will not lose all their seats and Mary Harney has no chance of losing her seat. :)


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,247 Mod ✭✭✭✭flogen


    The PDs always, always surprise at elections. They will loose some, and gain others. I'd be very surprised if it gets as low as four.
    Thing is, when it comes to crunch time, enough people tend to realise that there is only one party, in all of Ireland, that will say things like "profit is not a dirty word" and "some inequality is nessacery", and we need at least one party that will say this.

    Yes, we need more cliché's from our political parties.

    Seriously though, I think the PDs problem this time around is that they're core ideals (low taxes, economic liberalism etc.) have been adopted by all parties bar Sinn Fein (and even they say they won't raise taxes).

    The fact is that upon their inception their ideas were unique enough, but after 10 years of economic success it would idiotic for FF, FG, Lab etc. to suggest that they've failed - which is why everyone is offering tax cuts and stamp duty reform etc.

    At this point the PDs are offering almost nothing new by comparison and this is coupled with a FG fight-back and a disillusionment amongst some voters over the whole "watchdog" thing.

    You're right, though, the PDs have always been written off and have always performed better than expected by pundits (McDowell was supposed to be a dead duck in Dublin South Central in 2002 and he topped the poll). That said I don't see them making any gains and I see a few losses.

    The only way that won't happen is if huge population changes have severely skewed the electorate in various constituencies - which isn't impossible to imagine when you look at Dublin North, a normally left-of-centre constituency, which has seen a 50% increase in population since 2002. Who's to say that a lot of them aren't right-wing voters?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,683 ✭✭✭DeepBlue


    Indeed the PDs have been written off in the past and any journalist would be loathe to repeat the mistake.

    There are a couple of other factors that might make an impact this time around.
    They've replaced Harney who had consistently high approval ratings and would have widespread appeal with McDowell who currently has the lowest approval rating and is very much a "love him or loathe him" personality.
    Also one of their main planks was their emphasis on ethics in public life. This would appear to have been ditched as a core value and may also cost them votes.

    Harney would be a huge loss if she wasn't returned. McDowell adds colour but it's difficult to point to any of his real achievements and one suspects he's better at bluster and sound bite than actual delivery.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭irish_bob


    i am constantly bemused at why the pd,s are so unpopular
    the goverment goes through a rough patch but fianna fail get a pass yet the pd,s are the antichrists
    thier policys are more in tune with most irish people than all the other small partys yet we the irish people do not reward them for it
    this is because thier a very young party and because most irish people vote for what ever party their parents and grandparents voted for , the pd,s having no tradition are at a disadvantage no matter how much impact thier core policys have had on transforming this economy , it dont register with the people , young people who are pulling in a decent wage be it working in construction or whatever for whoom the health service is not a pressing issue , they would not be caught dead admitting they voted pd yet would openly admit to saying they intend voting sinn fein even though they would only take a big chunk out of thier pay check
    its not trendy to vote pd and as a result young affluent single people who,s natural home should be the pd,s as thier more seucular than FF or FG instead would vote SINN FEIN



    as regards thier chances in the forth coming election , i fear they would be doing well to come back with 4 seats
    tom parlon who has been a major disapointment and is not a natural pd anyway is a gonner ,
    this may surprise you but seeing that the pd,s are not going to be part of the next goverment , then i would like to see micheal mc dowell loose his seat
    if micheal mc dowell were to make every irish person living a millionaire and solve the israeli - palestinian crisis aswell as every other global problem
    irish people would still not like him , he tells it like it is and we hate that
    hes also too intelectual and we hate that too , we much perfer someone like bertie who while excellent on the north has not done a whole lot down here
    he is loathe to alienate even a single group and as a result wont take on the unions or the chronically innefficent public service

    so i would like to see mc dowell bite the dust , that way the party may be seen in a whole new light and given a fair shake


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭AlanOB


    if micheal mc dowell were to make every irish person living a millionaire and solve the israeli - palestinian crisis aswell as every other global problem
    irish people would still not like him , he tells it like it is and we hate that
    hes also too intelectual and we hate that too

    You may be barely literate ;) but you've hit the nail on the head there.

    People can't stand the realism of McDowell. He makes a perfectly reasonable statement like "A certain amount of inequality is inevitable in any society", which to anyone with a brain is patently obvious, and he's jumped on and called every name under the sun. And not just by misguided left-wing idealogues either, by the media too.

    I think the media have used his rough, honest and realistic manner and exploited it to create a hate figure for the great unwashed to rail against. And at that they have been very successful.

    And it's a terrible pity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭cm2000


    i heard mcdoweel say today that the pd's are going to get 10 seats! maybe the downfall will recover a bit but that's plain dillusional


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭AlanOB


    Yeah I laughed at that too CM. I suppose he has to say that to give the air of positivity. Deep down I'm sure he knows what I and other supporters do - that we'll be lucky to hold 3.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭cm2000


    if only liz o donnell did a better job on her poster-you so would- then there would be a fourth??? oh well


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭Agent J


    The realsim of McDowell? The honesty?

    More like the Hypocracy.

    A Minister for justice who gives out the media talking to the gardai but when its suits his purpose he is happy to leak things that he has access to because of his position and hides behind "Dail Privilige".

    Lets not forget his attitude when pressed for evidence on leaks with the media talking to the gardai.
    "I know what i know".

    Or how about using a local issue like the incinerator to decide the formation of a national government?
    Wheres the extra 2,000 Gardai?
    What about the debacle over the rapists being released?

    Or how about the contraband that he orders a raid a few weeks before the election(Only i might ad as a reaction to liveline)?

    I have never heard him step up to the plate and say "My bad, it happened under my watch and i am responable"

    That would be being honest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭cm2000


    Agent J wrote:
    The realsim of McDowell? The honesty?

    More like the Hypocracy.

    A Minister for justice who gives out the media talking to the gardai but when its suits his purpose he is happy to leak things that he has access to because of his position and hides behind "Dail Privilige".

    Lets not forget his attitude when pressed for evidence on leaks with the media talking to the gardai.
    "I know what i know".

    Or how about using a local issue like the incinerator to decide the formation of a national government?
    Wheres the extra 2,000 Gardai?
    What about the debacle over the rapists being released?

    Or how about the contraband that he orders a raid a few weeks before the election(Only i might ad as a reaction to liveline)?

    I have never heard him step up to the plate and say "My bad, it happened under my watch and i am responable"

    That would be being honest.
    for the last time with the rapists. the legislative branch of the govt. ie the oirechtas, cannot by the constitution involve itsself in judicial trials. it was the courts fault not the government


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭AlanOB


    Haven't seen the poster but I'll take your word for it!

    You never know about Liz though. With support for FG and to a greater extent Labour apparently falling she might get enough first preferences to beat out Shatter and Alex White for the final seat. Transfers could kill her though. Shatter will get lots from Olivia Mitchell.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭cm2000


    AlanOB wrote:
    Haven't seen the poster but I'll take your word for it!

    You never know about Liz though. With support for FG and to a greater extent Labour apparently falling she might get enough first preferences to beat out Shatter and Alex White for the final seat. Transfers could kill her though. Shatter will get lots from Olivia Mitchell.
    yeah im not too farmiliar with the constituency but i hope she gets in and not just for eye candy, shes a dam good politician.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    I don't get why people would vote for any of them tbh. They haven't delivered IMO. End of. We have (or haven't as the case maybe) Health, Crime, decentralisation (which has been forgotten).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 986 ✭✭✭ateam


    Not an expert on PD candidates, but can anyone suggest where the PDs are in with a chance of making a gain?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭Agent J


    cm2000 wrote:
    for the last time with the rapists. the legislative branch of the govt. ie the oirechtas, cannot by the constitution involve itsself in judicial trials. it was the courts fault not the government

    Yeah except the Dept of Justice was warned back in 2002 that the current legisalation could be challenged and should be changed.

    Who was minister back in 2002?(After the election that is...)

    What about the rest of it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭cm2000


    well the 2000 gardai are a couple of months late-not exactly a huge concern for me- and in keeping with how the country runs(financial year). as for the contraband mobiles and stuff are lifted every week from jails but the old jails make it easy for that sort of thing to get in which is why the govt wanted new modern prisons-which insidently opposition parties opposed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭Agent J


    Please dont give me that claptrap of saying the opposition parties stopped new prisions being built.
    FF and PDs have a majority therefore they can pretty much do what they like without interferance.

    How many have been shut down compared to how many have been open during the life of this government?

    Off the top of my head i think its 2 or 3 shut down and none opened.

    Is there even buidling work taking place on them?( I honestly dont know, last i heard they were still having planning issues)

    And if there are raids every week then why was all this extra stuff found in the last one spefically as reaction to the liveline incident?

    See if was only 2,000 extra gardai that were a few months late then there wouldnt be so much and issue with it. I think we are supposed to have a metro to the airport by now as well....
    Forgive my Cysicsm(sp?) but i remember after the 2002 election only too well. Cuts left right and centre. So those gardai may never materilise. Also is the 2000 inclusive of the "reserve" or not?

    Since you are trying to defend McDowell then please defend him leaking classified documents to the media while at the same time giving out about the gardai talking to the media? Is it ok for Minister for justice to do that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭cm2000


    Agent J wrote:

    Forgive my Cysicsm(sp?) but i remember after the 2002 election only too well. Cuts left right and centre. So those gardai may never materilise. Also is the 2000 inclusive of the "reserve" or not?
    ?
    i believe given the economic climate at the time the cutbacks were prudent and neccesary and facilitated a recovery


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭cm2000


    Agent J wrote:
    Please dont give me that claptrap of saying the opposition parties stopped new prisions being built.
    FF and PDs have a majority therefore they can pretty much do what they like without interferance.

    How many have been shut down compared to how many have been open during the life of this government?

    Off the top of my head i think its 2 or 3 shut down and none opened.

    Since you are trying to defend McDowell then please defend him leaking classified documents to the media while at the same time giving out about the gardai talking to the media? Is it ok for Minister for justice to do that?
    prison places have increased. this is an extract from a mcdowell speach on the 3rd of may -before liveline-. this is also the prison which the opposition tries to oppose.
    Thornton Hall Prison PPP Project
    "The case for closing Mountjoy Prison has been well documented and I don't propose to go over those issues again. As you know the Prison Service has purchased land at Thornton, north County Dublin as the site for the proposed new prison complex to replace the outdated facilities at Mountjoy Prison.

    The new campus at Thornton will have a total capacity of approximately 1,400 spaces including an assessment centre, high, medium and lower security facilities as well as step down facilities. The campus design is regime orientated and will allow for the development of progressive rehabilitative programmes, the introduction of enhanced educational and work training facilities and the introduction of single person cells with in cell sanitation to end the inhumane practice of slopping out. In addition, the new prison complex will also be constructed with an extensive cordon sanitaire to prevent drugs and other items being thrown over the wall."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭Agent J


    "i can confirm that no significant project over runs or cutbacks are planned. Secretly or other wise"-

    Charlie McCreevy May 11th 2002.

    Less than a month later a Memo came from the Department of Finance with the 1st wave of cutbacks. Either we were lied to or it was incompetence. Neither is acceptable.

    Before you try and distance it from the PD's there we part of the same government so they get the same blame or credit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭Agent J


    cm2000 wrote:
    prison places have increased.

    Please back that up with evidence.

    I dont intend to be smart here but there have been prisions closed and none opened right?

    Have there been building work on prisions to extend capcity?
    Were we below capcity already?
    Do we have less people going to jail?

    If none of the above are true then i simple do not see how logically we have more spaces unless we are overcrowding them.

    As for thorthon hall. After 5 years in office they have only purchased land?
    If thats the case how long will we be waiting for it to be built?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭Blaster99


    One of the main achievements of the Dept of Justice was the sorting out of the endless stream of illegal immigrants who entered Ireland from France and the assorted chaos that caused. That has now stopped.

    Another great PD achievement was the liberal work visa rules introduced by Dept of Enterprise when Harney was in charge. A lot of very smart people from outside of the EU emigrated to Ireland and has done this country a lot of good. Ireland had the most liberal immigration rules in the world for a while. With the extended EU this was no longer needed but it did the trick when it was necessary.

    I think Harney could do some good in Dept of Health as well, given more time. That whole area is so fundamentally broken that it's just not about throwing more money and hospital beds at it (as per the opposition), it needs serious fixing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    Agent J wrote:
    Yeah except the Dept of Justice was warned back in 2002 that the current legisalation could be challenged and should be changed.
    It never said that the legislation might be unconstitutional, it said that it might be unfair. Big difference.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭Blaster99


    And by the way, if you ever wanted a reason to not vote for Labour it is their assertion that if the economy goes pearshaped then they will prioritise health. Yeah, that's going to get the wheels going again, pumping more money into that unproductive black hole of uselessness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭Agent J


    Blaster99 wrote:
    One of the main achievements of the Dept of Justice was the sorting out of the endless stream of illegal immigrants who entered Ireland from France and the assorted chaos that caused. That has now stopped.

    Point accepted. Personally i dont agree with the citizenship referendum as the way to do it but thats a debate for another day
    Blaster99 wrote:
    Another great PD achievement was the liberal work visa rules introduced by Dept of Enterprise when Harney was in charge.

    You should go check out the rules now. They may possibly be the strictest now. A friend of mine who has been here since 4th year of school has to leave the country at the end of may when they finish college because they wont be able to get a visa. In short you can have 6 monthts to stay and
    look for work but cant work a menial job to pay the bills in the meantime while you find something that will pay 30-35k basic. Those are the current rules and there is very long list of jobs they wont give Visas for...
    Blaster99 wrote:
    I think Harney could do some good in Dept of Health as well, given more time. That whole area is so fundamentally broken that it's just not about throwing more money and hospital beds at it (as per the opposition), it needs serious fixing.

    Shes had 2 and half years i believe. Are there still people queing for hours in A&E?
    Also i believe the current government are offering a certain number of beds as well under that "Co location" plan which i dont recall seeing on any plan for government back in '02.

    I commend Harney for wanting to try and take on health. I just believe treating it like a business will not work and so far is doing a lot of damage. I mean trying to sign contract before the election is just ridiculus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭Agent J


    It never said that the legislation might be unconstitutional, it said that it might be unfair. Big difference.

    So how many years should it take for the department of justice to deal with legislation that "might be unfair"?

    Because they had 4.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭Agent J


    Blaster99 wrote:
    And by the way, if you ever wanted a reason to not vote for Labour it is their assertion that if the economy goes pearshaped then they will prioritise health. Yeah, that's going to get the wheels going again, pumping more money into that unproductive black hole of uselessness.

    See thats a big problem i have with how people vote.
    They vote for the party and not the person.

    Primary concern for someone should be the local TD and who they are and what they do. Secondary should be the parties policies. Im not saying forget about the party entirely but it shouldnt in my opinion be above the actual person you are electing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭Blaster99


    Agent J wrote:
    Shes had 2 and half years i believe. Are there still people queing for hours in A&E?
    Also i believe the current government are offering a certain number of beds as well under that "Co location" plan which i dont recall seeing on any plan for government back in '02.

    I commend Harney for wanting to try and take on health. I just believe treating it like a business will not work and so far is doing a lot of damage. I mean trying to sign contract before the election is just ridiculus.

    I don't really know enough about it to comment on the co-location plan. I have no issue with it because it's really just fixing an existing co-location situation. I have no problem with private hospitals. In fact, the ideal situation from my point of view would be to privatise the whole lot and give everyone a basic health insurance policy. The latter was actually Labour policy before the last election, if I recall. It's very difficult for politicians to run anything efficiently, because efficiency doesn't appear to be politically acceptable.

    I believe the A&E situation has improved, perhaps partly because the charges went up to get people to go to GP's instead. It's obviously not great as evidenced by corridors full of trolleys. I just don't hear anything from the opposition that spells out how they're planning to fix it, other than throwing more of my money at it.

    I guess I was referring to her taking on the consultants, who appear to be a major stumbling block to progress. I've seen the inside of an Irish hospital a couple of times and it's flipping impossible to get out of them. I don't know if it's because my health insurer is paying so it's good money for them or what. This is one of the areas where Irish hospitals underperform internationally in a major way.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 155 ✭✭Knee-Vee


    Why has it taken 5 years to buy the site for the new prison? Not to mention all the hassle with the locals objections. Nothing has even been built on the site yet, after 5 years. That doesn't seem like an increase in prison places to me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭Agent J


    Im consious of going way of topic on the co loaction thing so i'll keep it brief.

    It wasnt on any plan for government back in 2002.

    Ok you say you dont know enough to comment. Then use logic and think about it like this.

    Premise.
    30% of beds in public hospitals are taken up by private health insurance. We let them build there own place on the same site as existing hospitals then we gain those beds back.

    With 2 hospitals seems to be inefficient though. You'll need 2 sets of everything as well as staffing levels... i mean hows it supposed to work when we are short on nurses now anyway?

    Any why try to shove it through before the election? Should this kind of thing really be rushed?

    Now as for the A&E charges. Should people really be worrying about paying for something if they think its enough to go to A&E in the 1st place? And tell me how does one "Shop around" if the charges are too much?

    Of course people go to A&E when they really should just go to the GP but is punishing them by charging people and therefor putting people off going really the best way to solve it?

    Anyway this way of the topic i admit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Agent J wrote:
    See thats a big problem i have with how people vote.
    They vote for the party and not the person.

    Primary concern for someone should be the local TD and who they are and what they do. Secondary should be the parties policies. Im not saying forget about the party entirely but it shouldnt in my opinion be above the actual person you are electing.


    You've got it the wrong way around!

    You're electing a government to run the country.

    The local elections are for the local representatives.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    To be honest I think this is far different from last time. The PD's last time were getting into government as the watchdog to make sure that FF didn't steal the family silver and proper ethics were adhered to.

    Its quite obvious that they did not do this they went from Rottweilers to Poodles to Pekingese ie Watchdog all the way to Berties Lapdog. People won't make the same mistake twice.

    And as for the two portfolios they hold coming to the election the perception is that they are in worse condition than they were before they took over with any actual action in the Health Service only happening after a scandel eg MRSA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭Agent J


    Slow coach wrote:
    You've got it the wrong way around!

    You're electing a government to run the country.

    The local elections are for the local representatives.

    No you are not.

    You are electing a representive for your area to the Dail.
    The Dail then elect the governemnt.

    You are electing a person not a party. Too many people make that mistake imho.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    ateam wrote:
    Not an expert on PD candidates, but can anyone suggest where the PDs are in with a chance of making a gain?

    Well, they've a candidate running in Cork South Central but while I've heard of a fair amount of people my age talking about giving him a first preference most people agree that there isn't a big enough core PD vote (or even a big enough transfer vote) for him to get through. I'd be very surprised if he gets in. The fight for the fifth seat is going to be bloody and I can't see him sneaking in past potential FF and FG rivals.

    Not that that helps but he's the only candidate running in a constituency that I've any idea about.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43 joecoote


    Wow, some big tangents on the thread. Thanks for those PD's who answered the questions. I have more, but will wait till after election to ask. Seems general opinion that PD's are looking at average 3 seats. Looking at various constituencies, they have'll at least 2 up to 5/6. One interesting thing I did find on another thread were references to Ayn Rand as an underlying philosophy. Is this in anyway correct?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    joecoote wrote:
    Wow, some big tangents on the thread. Thanks for those PD's who answered the questions. I have more, but will wait till after election to ask. Seems general opinion that PD's are looking at average 3 seats. Looking at various constituencies, they have'll at least 2 up to 5/6.
    They will have more than three for certain. They aren't nearly as poorly off as pundits like to say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,626 ✭✭✭Stargal


    They will have more than three for certain. They aren't nearly as poorly off as pundits like to say.

    At 3-4% in the polls and with a high number of sitting TD's unlikely to keep their seats, I think it's more than fair to suggest that the PD's will have 3 seats or less after the election.

    In 2002 when they were polling similar numbers and still managed to get 8 seats, they were the coalition partners of an unbeatable FF (which polled 45% consistently throughout the campaign, compared to 22-23% FG), and so did well on transfers, as people wanted to continue with the stable government of the time.

    This time around, not only is there a viable alternative coalition, but there are also alternative partners for FF. Basically, the PD’s are expendable.

    Sexton, Grealish and Fiona O'Malley are gonners, barring a miracle Tim O'Malley and Parlon are gone and Liz O'Donnell is fighting for survival in one of the toughest constituencies in the country. I've heard from several sources (some of them unbiased!) that Harney is doing very badly in her constituency, as she never gets to visit it cos she's so tied up with Health.

    I give them 2 seats to be honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,044 ✭✭✭Andrew 83


    Rather bizarrely the PDs got exactly the same share of the vote in both 1997 and 2002 but managed to get 4 seats in one and 8 in the next. It depends where the support is and how it is shared around. Their doubling of seats in 02 was a little distorted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭irish_bob


    the pd,s will be lucky to come back with about 4 seats after the election

    but thier is one thing i dont get , when this goverment screws up , its the pd,s who take all the flak , the cute hoors in FF get a pass
    its as if expect a very standard from the pd yet we expect nothing but crookedness from FF anyway so its ok when they make a pigs ear of things

    someone in here said that in this country people tend to vote for canditates according to which party they are running for as opposed to voting for the canditate on merit , this is baschially along the same lines as i was saying earlier
    the vast majority of people in ireland vote for which ever party thier parents and grandparents voted for and as a result a young party like the pd,s who,s no ones grandfather ever voted for and no ones father or mother voted for from the start
    we are incredibly traditontal when it comes to voting in this country
    as a result a gob****e from FF or FG has a way better chance of being elected than a genius from the smaller partys


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    I predict around 5/6 seats for the PDs. Minimum. I will apologise if I'm wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    I predict around 5/6 seats for the PDs. Minimum. I will apologise if I'm wrong.

    I've backed them to get 4 or 5 seats so I'll be out of pocket if I'm wrong. I'd love if the people saying they'll get no seats actually put their money where their mouth is. :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,626 ✭✭✭Stargal


    I predict around 5/6 seats for the PDs. Minimum. I will apologise if I'm wrong.
    Apologise for supporting them or for having made an inaccurate prediction? ;)
    nesf wrote:
    I've backed them to get 4 or 5 seats so I'll be out of pocket if I'm wrong. I'd love if the people saying they'll get no seats actually put their money where their mouth is. :p
    I think it's unlikely that they'll lost all 8 seats, but I've bet that they'll retain 2. And I don't like to lose...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    Laika wrote:
    I think it's unlikely that they'll lost all 8 seats, but I've bet that they'll retain 2. And I don't like to lose...

    Well, we'll find out soon. :)

    I find it rather amusing when people suggest that they'll lose all eight though. It's hard to see McDonnell, Harney, Parlon and O'Donnell all losing their seats though most of the others are on shakier ground.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,811 ✭✭✭✭billy the squid


    Tim O'Malley will be the only limerick east TD not gracing us with his presence in the dail come June in my opinion.

    Over all I think that only McDowell and Harney will be in the 30th Dail.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement