Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Jefferey Archer

  • 23-03-2007 9:30pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 703 ✭✭✭


    Has Jefferey Archer written a revised New Testament? Saw a newspaper headline but didn't get a chance to explore it


Comments

  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    He was on the Late Late last night, I'm sure it'll pop up on youtube if it was particularly silly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,857 ✭✭✭✭Dave!


    Yeh saw some of it last night. He was explaining that it's an example of Christians not being complacent and accepting everything as fact, but rather being sceptical and using external sources to corroborate stories described in the Bible. He said that a few of the supposed miracles never happened, eg. walking on water. Of course, 90% of the miracles did happen (rising from the dead and so on :rolleyes: ), but not everything did. He was on the show with some other bloke (a priest), whom he spent most of the time verbally fellating. Didn't recieve a particularly strong response either way from the audience, and there was some tosser of a religious journalist who was quite critical and insulting of the book and authors.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    I turned off after the nonsense that was the miracle "discussion".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,857 ✭✭✭✭Dave!


    Yeh that was fairly infuriating.... grrg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Asiaprod


    Filan wrote:
    Has Jefferey Archer written a revised New Testament? Saw a newspaper headline but didn't get a chance to explore it

    Are you refering to his new book "the Gospel According to Judas"? Just finished reading a review of it in this morning's paper. Looks interesting.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 703 ✭✭✭Filan


    No but I believe that the portrayal of Judas has been revised in this new catechism by Archer


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,857 ✭✭✭✭Dave!


    I'm pretty sure 'the Gospel according to Judas' is the book they were talking about......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Asiaprod


    DaveMcG wrote:
    I'm pretty sure 'the Gospel according to Judas' is the book they were talking about......

    I feel so, I have never heard of any New Catechism by him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 703 ✭✭✭Filan


    Maybe it's not a new Catechism...but he has rewritten the new testament apparently with Vatican approval. The miracles of walking on water and turning water into wine have been deleted and the betrayal by Judas brought in line with the Gospel of Judas


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Filan wrote:
    Maybe it's not a new Catechism...but he has rewritten the new testament apparently with Vatican approval. The miracles of walking on water and turning water into wine have been deleted and the betrayal by Judas brought in line with the Gospel of Judas

    That's very much pick and mix religion though. If you don't believe in one thing, why believe in any of it.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    But thats the majority of them. As you are seeing in the creationism thread believing every single thing thats written down to be literal truth results in vast selective self blinkering to the observed facts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭Excelsior


    The Gospel of Judas is a Gnostic text written in or around 325AD. Taking it to be a serious historical document would be akin to finding a text today that claimed to be written by Napoleon's right hand men and finding in the prologue discussion of nuclear weaponry and airstrike assaults.

    It is absolutely preposterous to me that in a day when so much of the theological and historical research points back again and again to the canonical Gospels being eye-witness reports, the mass population are more convinced than ever that anything old must be of equal validity.

    Archer is a fraud and a pulp-fiction author. I would recommend people go to historians for their history.


Advertisement