Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Advice needed on breaking up table in MTT's please.

  • 13-03-2007 5:18pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭


    I could do with a bit of help here boardies. I have been roped into being a sort of tournament director at our weekly pub tourney, It was no problem when it was only 1 or 2 table but we now regularly have 4 or 5 tables and while im pretty au fiat with most rules im not sure about breaking tables up and moving players.

    The software we use will do it randomly and players take their newly allotted seats wityhout any *hassle but problems arise if for example a player who was big blind on the broken table is allocated the Big Blind position at his new table, but the rules clearly state that a player moving to a new table must assume the responsibilities of his new position, except if he is placed between button and small blind. The same hassle arises if a small blind comes in to the small blind position etc. Im confused.:( Any suggestions??


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 640 ✭✭✭MickL


    Rockfish wrote:
    I could do with a bit of help here boardies. I have been roped into being a sort of tournament director at our weekly pub tourney, It was no problem when it was only 1 or 2 table but we now regularly have 4 or 5 tables and while im pretty au fiat with most rules im not sure about breaking tables up and moving players.

    The software we use will do it randomly and players take their newly allotted seats wityhout any *hassle but problems arise if for example a player who was big blind on the broken table is allocated the Big Blind position at his new table, but the rules clearly state that a player moving to a new table must assume the responsibilities of his new position, except if he is placed between button and small blind. The same hassle arises if a small blind comes in to the small blind position etc. Im confused.:( Any suggestions??

    the most simple way to do it is a seat draw but if a player comes in on the BB after just payin it thats just tough luck its a rondom seat draw in most cases where the player comes in on the SB he will more or likely sit out the hand till the button passes which is the most likely scenario!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭Rockfish


    the most simple way to do it is a seat draw but if a player comes in on the BB after just payin it thats just tough luck its a rondom seat draw

    That was my argument but didnt always go down to well.
    most cases where the player comes in on the SB he will more or likely sit out the hand till the button passes which is the most likely scenario!!!

    Surely if the BB has to assume responsibility then the same would go for the SB?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,404 ✭✭✭Goodluck2me


    actually now you can come into the SB so long as there hasnt been a hand between when the player in that place previously being knocked out and the new player coming in. seat draws are the way to go, and with regard to people being unhappy, who will be delighted that they have to pay BB twice you are TD rule and move on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭Rockfish


    Thanks for that lads.
    you are TD rule and move on.

    Oh i certainly od, just wasnt 100% sure that i was right, thats all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,895 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    it might be easier if you move people into similar positions.
    4 tables. 6 players on each. split table 4
    on table 4
    players 1 & 4 move to table 1. player 1 takes worst available seat, such as the earliest. player 4 takes the seat further away from the seat.
    pair players 2&5 and 3&6.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 640 ✭✭✭MickL


    that rule coming in on the SB will get very confusing for a TD on his first night or so!! id leave it till im more accustomed to it!! and that rule only really aplies if the player was knocked out of the sb position on th previous hand!! one thing you must remember when you puttin players in on the blinds is that the playre on the table that WASN'T broke cant play the BB twice!!!

    Good luck with this rockfish ya need any advise dont hesitate t pm me!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,897 ✭✭✭BigDragon


    Rockfish wrote:
    Oh i certainly od,

    Welcome to the TD fraternity. It looks like you'll fit in fine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭Rockfish


    one thing you must remember when you puttin players in on the blinds is that the playre on the table that WASN'T broke cant play the BB twice!!!

    For the sake of argument let us assume that the dealer and sb on a table have all busted out on the one hand and a broken table has two plyers coming to this table and they assume the dealer and sb seats. What happens now to the bb?:confused: :


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 263 ✭✭DITTag


    Rockfish wrote:
    For the sake of argument let us assume that the dealer and sb on a table have all busted out on the one hand and a broken table has two plyers coming to this table and they assume the dealer and sb seats. What happens now to the bb?:confused: :

    The person who had been BB last would now be Sb and the person who is just sitting down would be dealer


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭Rockfish


    Let me put it another way....

    For the sake of argument let us assume that the players who would be dealer and sb on a table for the next hand have all busted out on the one hand and a broken table has two plyers coming to this table and they assume the dealer and sb seats. What happens now to the bb?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 640 ✭✭✭MickL


    If im reading this right the player that was UTG is now BB alone with a dead button on the player that arrived to the previous SB seat the next hand the button stays and the SB and BB is posted!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,895 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Rockfish wrote:
    Let me put it another way....

    For the sake of argument let us assume that the players who would be dealer and sb on a table for the next hand have all busted out on the one hand and a broken table has two plyers coming to this table and they assume the dealer and sb seats. What happens now to the bb?

    nothing happens to the BB player, he busted out. "the sb for the next hand" is the previous BB.
    so the players assume the dealer and sb seats, and the previous UTG player is now the BB. As it is supposed to be


Advertisement