Under exposure?

Carrigart Exile

http://www.mitchelllibrary.org/virtualmitchell/image.php?i=16134&r=2&t=4


taken from the Mitchell Library archive. Not reported as anything spiritual and I know in those days you had to stand still for about two weeks to get a good picture but what do you think?

6th

I'd right it off straight away because it looks too staged or like a fault ... hard to explain but theres no 'fluidity' to it.

6th

Maybe ODonnell will have something to add? We were discussing paranormal photographs in Glasgow last night at the beers.

Carrigart Exile

6th wrote:

I'd right it off straight away because it looks too staged or like a fault ... hard to explain but theres no 'fluidity' to it.

I do think it is underexposure but it still spooked me a touch; I used to play in that house in the 70s when it was a ruin and as kids we were all convinced it was haunted.

Stoner

yeah it looks abit too uniform or something, not that I'd admit it was real in any event:D , but something looks wrong it's too perfect. It does look like a haunted building though!