Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Carbon capture options and costs

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,074 ✭✭✭BendiBus


    I always have a picture in my mind of an undersea earthquake causing a massive CO2 release from one of these storage locations and turning the ocean into something like a well-shaken can of 7-up :eek: Followed by an almost instant increase in greenhouse gas in the amosphere.

    Is this pure hysteria on my part :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,772 ✭✭✭Lennoxschips


    Yeah, that's what I always worried about too! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 353 ✭✭piraka


    BendiBus wrote:
    I always have a picture in my mind of an undersea earthquake causing a massive CO2 release from one of these storage locations and turning the ocean into something like a well-shaken can of 7-up :eek: Followed by an almost instant increase in greenhouse gas in the amosphere.

    Is this pure hysteria on my part :D

    Can't be any worse than the methane chlatrates


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,074 ✭✭✭BendiBus


    piraka wrote:
    Can't be any worse than the methane chlatrates

    Now I'm totally hysterical :eek: :D
    The Future. The juiciest disaster-movie scenario would be a release of enough methane to significantly change the atmospheric concentration, on a time scale that is fast compared with the lifetime of methane.

    http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/12/methane-hydrates-and-global-warming/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 353 ✭✭piraka


    BendiBus wrote:
    Now I'm totally hysterical :eek: :D

    Ooops :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 DrFunkenstein


    If you are looking to reduce carbon in the atmosphere, you should really petition for the legalisation of cannabis ruderillis, or simply put Hemp, ruderillis looks totally different to the traditional drug form.

    This strain of cannabis contains no active drug ingredients and anyone who did try to put it to such a use would end up with a nasty headache.

    But my point is, cannabis is an annual crop which can grow up to 15 feet in a single growing season!!! It takes in around 3 times the amount of carbon compared to any other plant. Most plants grow optimally at atmospheric carbon concentrations of 500ppm while Hemp reaches optimum growth at 1500ppm

    3 times the carbon sequestration power than any other plant of comparable size.

    Cost, how much could it cost to let nature take its course?

    Cannabis can grow in poor soil and actually conditions soil. After it has fulfilled the growth cycle, it can be used for bio ethanol / bio diesel as well as any other uses such as Paper, Clothes, Organic Animal feed.

    So really get over the taboo of cannabis its pros far outweigh the cons. Yet it remains illegal to grow this plant. Madness

    All information should be verifiable by a simple google search.

    Questions and comments welcome..


    Regards,
    Dr. Funkenstein


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    you should really petition for the legalisation of cannabis ruderillis, or simply put Hemp,
    So if you win the $25m Branson is offering, would that be money for old rope ?

    could also help provide a wind block for new forestry while the saplings are growing up


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,890 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i once read that a field of a certain type of wheat (can't remember which type) which grows 8 foot tall contains 400 times the excess carbon in the air directly above the field - so growing one crop of this over one one hundredth of the land area of the earth, and sequestering it, would remove all excess CO2 in the atmosphere in one year.

    that all depends on the original claim being true, obviously.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭probe


    So if you win the $25m Branson is offering, would that be money for old rope ?

    could also help provide a wind block for new forestry while the saplings are growing up
    Branson is a marketing wa**er. He is ready to grab any bit of media hot air to make his money balloon rise higher. The day this guy does something serious, low profile, commensurate with his financial and media resources to make the planet materially greener, I’ll eat my proverbial hat!

    .probe


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 353 ✭✭piraka


    probe wrote:
    Branson is a marketing wa**er. He is ready to grab any bit of media hot air to make his money balloon rise higher. The day this guy does something serious, low profile, commensurate with his financial and media resources to make the planet materially greener, I’ll eat my proverbial hat!

    .probe

    He has a good role model in Al Gore


  • Advertisement
Advertisement