bringing sexy back C&C

irishcrazyhorse

Was ment to do a shot with a guy and a girl tonight but the guy never showed so ended up just having a bit of fun with the girl,only used a bit of cloning,what do you think?



and here is the unedited version

Fenster

Would be niceer without the effect, methinks

gandalf

Yep the cloning ruins it!!

kjt

I'd have to agree with the other comments. Nice shot though

Morlar

I think the effect looks a bit gimmicky and takes away from a cool shot. I'd prefer to see a higher resolution version of it. The processing otherwise looks really good - great lighting and composition too.

rymus

agree with all of the above. At first glance I didn't actually notice the cloning, but then... I did and now it's all I can see.

Roen

The pose is excellent and I love the lighting too.
The shoulders are a little on the hot side though. I would have got her to bend her left arm a tiny bit just to iron out the mouth like wrinkle in it. The burning in the bottom right has also crossed over in to the frame.
And for some reason the brightest of her vertebrae seems to draw my eye all the time, I could be just a 'back man' though.

That said I do like it an awful lot and you've certainly got the sexy back thing down. Hubba Hubba!

440Hz

Can we see the original? Not that I want to look at female backs, but the cloning interests me now, and just curious as to what the original is like.

Waltons

rymus wrote:

agree with all of the above. At first glance I didn't actually notice the cloning, but then... I did and now it's all I can see.

Same; I didn't notice it at first either. Nice shot though!

irishcrazyhorse

yeah,looking at it now,the cloning does take away,ill post the origanal in a small bit,thanks for the feedback

Fenster

One other thing I meant to say last night (except that I passed out) is that you might try burning in the top right corner, if a contrasy look is what you're after.

TelePaul

440Hz wrote:

Can we see the original? Not that I want to look at female backs, but the cloning interests me now, and just curious as to what the original is like.

I like looking at female backs....she looks hot. There. I said it.

irishcrazyhorse

TelePaul wrote:

I like looking at female backs....she looks hot. There. I said it.

She is hot and hotter in person.

I like the burning idea though for the right corner

I'll play around with it a bit more and throw it up this evening with some others i have

mikeanywhere

Fenster wrote:

Would be niceer without the effect, methinks

I agree

irishcrazyhorse

i put up the unedited version on top.
I dont think there is much 2 do with it cept maybe a bit of burning on the top right but i think it works quite well without it?
what do yee think?

TelePaul

irishcrazyhorse wrote:

i put up the unedited version on top.
I dont think there is much 2 do with it cept maybe a bit of burning on the top right but i think it works quite well without it?
what do yee think?

It's a lovely picture. I was almost expecting text or something in the top right corner...it seems to be slightly too big a space to keep blank. ust my opinion, but I liked the first one alot.

irishcrazyhorse

thanks very much guys for all the feedback

mishima

That looks excellent. The lighting and the shadows cast on her back are just bang on and the framing is just great!
I must say I prefer the unedited version by far.

440Hz

TelePaul wrote:

I like looking at female backs....she looks hot. There. I said it.

hehe yeah, you from your name im guessing your male so thats fine!! I on the other hand... well...

rymus

yeah 'cos we're strictly opposed to homosexuality around here... :rolleyes:

Fenster

I tried my own hand at the photo. I took out the border, make a decent pass at fixing the model's shadow and then burnt it in a bit:

440Hz

rymus wrote:

yeah 'cos we're strictly opposed to homosexuality around here... :rolleyes:

hehe careful now!!

dont be 'asking for it' :P