Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

wireless G what throughput have you achieved?

  • 28-12-2006 11:41pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,025 ✭✭✭


    watching the meter on my slingbox player it varies between 500 and 2300Kbps ( at a guess it averages 1100Kbps )

    on a wireless G connection .. below 750 it can disrupt the picture which is annoying.

    What kind of throughput are people getting on your wireless G ?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 481 ✭✭walshki


    From various tests I've run on speedguide it varies between 900kbs up to 2800kbps on the lappy with wireless. My connection is a 3mbps with IBB. I once got 3500kbps - not sure how that happened - possibly a fault in the test. Just ran one now and got 2mbps to one server and 2.5mbps to another. 2mbps seems to be average enough recently. I have the dlink Di524 router.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭ethernet


    I was copying an 8 Gb video file to another desktop on the network last week. I was getting a mean of 3 mbps. The ungrateful recipient accidentally tripped on the power chord near the end of the ordeal. In the end, I just made a DVD instead.

    The funny thing is that Windows says the wireless connection was connected at 108 mbps. Wireless-G just isn't good enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,949 ✭✭✭SouperComputer


    you rarely get anywhere near the quoted throughput for a series of reasons:

    1). Its not full duplex (Ie traffic can only flow one direction at a time, MIMO is an exception however)
    2). The bandwidth is shared between the clients so thats another chunk eaten.
    3). Encryption takes up space too :)
    4). TCP\IP and SMB, FTP or whatever you are using to transfer the files takes up more space. TCP\IP overhead typically eats 40% of any LAN connection beit wireless or cable.

    And this is assuming 100% signal strength in a Vacuum!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭ethernet


    Just out of curiousity, would there be any performance increase in using ad hoc mode instead of infrastructure if copying large files between two client both connected to a router wirelessly, i.e. to have them 'talk' directly to each other?


Advertisement