Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

copyright & youths

  • 08-12-2006 7:31pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭


    Are under 18s allowed to license their work in the same way as adults?
    What happens in the case of a copyright violation against them - are their parents allowed to fight the case?

    Should the work display "(C) <name of youth - the author>" or "(C) <name of parent/guardian>" ?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭padser


    Your question is a little to vague for me to understand.

    What do you mean by 'licence' their work?

    Copyright exists, if someone [whatever age] creates a work, then copyright exists in it. It doesnt matter whether '© Joe Bloggs 2006' is displayed on the work, although this is useful for evidentiary purposes.

    When you say 'licence' I'll assume you mean can a minor authorise someone else to use their work. I dont see (although I dont specifically know of it happening) why this would cause any problem. Certainly the copyright would rest with them, and not with their parents, and I dont see any reason why they wouldnt be able to authorise the use of it. Parental consent might be useful, but to be honest, from a copyright point of view I dont see why it would be essential.


    In the case of a voilation against them, it might well be the parents taking the case on behalf of the minor (as in Szabo v Esat Digiphone 1998) but this wouldnt really have much effect on the rights or issues involved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭declan_lgs


    padser wrote:
    In the case of a voilation against them, it might well be the parents taking the case on behalf of the minor (as in Szabo v Esat Digiphone 1998) but this wouldnt really have much effect on the rights or issues involved.
    Oh k, thanks!


Advertisement