1/2 Tribeca and multitablers

Mr. Flibble

Would people agree that the 1/2 level on Tribeca has the highest % of multitablers than any other level? I've started playing more 1/2 recently, as opposed to .50/1, and find that its nearly impossible to find a table without a multitabler. I take it there's a lot of people making a living playing at this level.

Regards level of play, peoples level of play seems to be more disparate here than .50/1 - there seem to be lots of fish still, but lots and lots of decent nits. Seems a bit more aggressive, although that may just be an illusion as I'm not used to the bet sizes.

Also, I've got into the habit of adding people to my buddy list temporarily to see if they are multitabling but a lot don't show up. Is it common for multitablers to remove the buddy list option so people can's see this, or would there be another reason for them not showing up on the list?

Does anyone have any comments between the two levels?

Imposter

I think .50/1 has quite a few multitablers too.

The main difference I have found between the 2 levels is that people raise continuation bets a lot more at 1/2 than they did at .50/1. They also float a lot more in position.

As for the fish thing there are fish everwhere.

willis

I couldnt beat 1/2 on tribeca over 6k hands, but could beat 2/4 and 3/6. There does seem to be a huge number of multitablers at 1/2 for some reason,there are players playing regulary at that level that i reckon would easily beat 3/6 on tribeca