If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)

Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Related threads?

scojones · 2006-09-06 13:54:15

Lads, some related threads by boardstracker.com thing is messing up every forum. It is showing alot of 'related threads' before the actual contents of a forum, really annoying.

06-09-2006 1:54pm

#1

scojones

Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭

Join Date: January 2002

Posts: 6808

Lads, some related threads by boardstracker.com thing is messing up every forum. It is showing alot of 'related threads' before the actual contents of a forum, really annoying.

Post edited by Shield on December 2021

0

Comments

#2 06-09-2006 1:56pm

Crucifix

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2002

Posts: 3393

Yep, happening here aswell.

0
#3 06-09-2006 1:58pm

[Deleted User]
Posts: 16,720 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: -

Posts: 16720

Yep, it's taking up most of the page.

Screenshot from safari: http://82.49.198.142/safaritest/1157550937-full.jpg

Internet Explorer: http://browsershots.org/screenshots/737714d6a5717569232ae1e8bae40cb7/

(on firefox 1.0.02, and it's fecking up for me. Tried clearing cache, no dice).

0
#4 06-09-2006 2:01pm

ferdi

Closed Accounts Posts: 6,598 ✭✭✭

Join Date: October 2001

Posts: 6167

here too. well annoying. slowing everything up.

0
#5 06-09-2006 2:01pm

scojones

Closed Accounts Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭

Join Date: January 2002

Posts: 6808

Seems to be fixed now.

0
#6 06-09-2006 2:01pm

RoundyMooney

Closed Accounts Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2005

Posts: 10325

Beat me to it, P. It's a combination of on site threads generated by teh dredded boardtrackur, and google ads.

Only appears on the front pages of fora if that's any help to anyone.

0
Advertisement
#7 06-09-2006 2:02pm

ballooba

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2002

Posts: 5777

Big thumbs down from me.

0
#8 06-09-2006 2:03pm

muffler

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,550 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2002

Posts: 40721

Im going to charge people now to post in the North West as they are getting better value - all those related threads added in as a bonus

0
#9 06-09-2006 2:03pm

RoundyMooney

Closed Accounts Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2005

Posts: 10325

All clear once more

0
#10 06-09-2006 2:08pm

[Deleted User]
Posts: 16,720 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: -

Posts: 16720

Ah, it's moved to the bottom of each thread now. I assume that this is part of an improvement from BoardTracker? Like the 'similar pages' links you have on some websites?

0
#11 06-09-2006 2:15pm

Cloud

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭

Join Date: February 1998

Posts: 4279

Exactly - enjoy! (Sorry about the previous mess up, I put it in the wrong template).

0
Advertisement
#12 06-09-2006 2:23pm

aidan_walsh

Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: February 2003

Posts: 15589

Looks good, except for being hard to read (Classic theme). Any chance of having the background colour lightened? Or have it follow the same colour conventions as the in-post colours.

0
#13 06-09-2006 2:46pm

Cloud

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭

Join Date: February 1998

Posts: 4279

Yes, fixing...

0
#14 06-09-2006 3:15pm

Pidgin

Closed Accounts Posts: 19 ✭

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 19

ballooba wrote:

Big thumbs down from me.

In general?:eek:
Or just before, when it was messed up due to the template error?

0
#15 06-09-2006 3:23pm

Cloud

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭

Join Date: February 1998

Posts: 4279

Fixed, got my page bg colours and body bg colours mixed up...

0
#16 06-09-2006 3:31pm

RE*AC*TOR

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,482 ✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2003

Posts: 6988

would something like the below be possible?

0
#17 06-09-2006 3:36pm

parasite

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,077 ✭✭✭

Join Date: October 2002

Posts: 2041

using the green theme, the background of the related threads box is black ...

0
#18 06-09-2006 4:14pm

Cloud

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭

Join Date: February 1998

Posts: 4279

Fixed green, let us know of any other problems. REACTOR - no, I don't think so

0
#19 06-09-2006 4:21pm

[Deleted User]
Posts: 16,720 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: -

Posts: 16720

Deadly, I like.

0
#20 07-09-2006 12:07am

kaizersoze

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,042 ✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2004

Posts: 6870

Looks fine and unobtrusive, but...... some of them are not very related to the thread being viewed.
I was reading a thread in the Broadband forum speculating about future speed increases and got:
Related threads.
Pedo caught with his pants down (May 06):D
4 about M** legal proceedings
Speed camera, I think I was caught:p

0
#21 07-09-2006 9:36am

Pidgin

Closed Accounts Posts: 19 ✭

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 19

kaizersoze wrote:

Looks fine and unobtrusive, but...... some of them are not very related to the thread being viewed.
I was reading a thread in the Broadband forum speculating about future speed increases and got:
Related threads.
Pedo caught with his pants down (May 06):D
4 about M** legal proceedings
Speed camera, I think I was caught:p

Can't always be right, can it?
There probably was some connection there though, c'mon admit it - speed probably? :cool:

while relevancy might be further enhanced in the future, it does sometimes get relevant related threads, doesn't it?
And anyway, didn't toy want to get to the thread about Pedo caught with his pants down??

0
Advertisement
#22 07-09-2006 11:36am

Sleepy

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,367 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 23617

Aye, relevancy seems way off on any of them I've seen...

0
#23 07-09-2006 2:47pm

Crash

Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,198 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2001

Posts: 10905

Pedo caught with his pants down (May 06) <---that one seems to be quite popular actually...

0
#24 07-09-2006 3:17pm

Pidgin

Closed Accounts Posts: 19 ✭

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 19

Sleepy wrote:

Aye, relevancy seems way off on any of them I've seen...

A bit rough on it, no? or did you mean the Pedo pants down example?

Some other examples..
for this thread I see:
> Threads regarding Import Duty/Tax 10:55 5-May-06
> Threads on house prices, etc 18:12 18-May-06
> blog threads by users and blog ads 10:16 27-May-06
> track of placed threads 13:32 9-Jul-06

Thread about threads (threads regarding... / threads on...). would you say relevancy is way off?

For some of the latests posts of the forums here..

For "Anime in reland"
> Anime Music Radio Programme Special 14:44 15-Jun-06
> Looking for a new series, recommendations wanted. 21:05 31-Jul-06
> Steampunk Anime 01:03 10-Aug-06
> Ireland to get 4G Mobile Soon (allegedly) 23:31 4-Sep-06

for "3D street art"
> fresh art online 15:16 26-May-06
> Street Fighter Alpha Anthology 18:02 22-Jul-06
> Fine art photography 22:01 28-Jul-06
> Art results?? 15:52 15-Aug-06
> Street Performers in Dublin (C&C) 22:55 1-Sep-06

for "Best way to audio capture"
> Best Ever Country and Western Songs 14:41 3-Aug-06
> Connecting multiple audio sources to a single mini-system 13:27 9-Aug-06
> Detecting audio codec 11:28 27-Aug-06
etc...

I am sure there will be cases where shown threads will be irrelevant.
But I hope it's the exception rather than the rule. Isn't it so?

0
#25 13-09-2006 9:13pm

[Deleted User]
Posts: 16,720 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: -

Posts: 16720

Just noticed an error at the bottom of each page.

http://82.49.198.142/safaritest/1158181982-full.jpg

[edit] Above pic is around 800KB, so 'tisn't dial-up friendly.

0
#26 13-09-2006 9:57pm

Verita

Closed Accounts Posts: 22 ✭

Join Date: August 2006

Posts: 20

Myth wrote:

Just noticed an error at the bottom of each page.

http://82.49.198.142/safaritest/1158181982-full.jpg

[edit] Above pic is around 800KB, so 'tisn't dial-up friendly.

Same here.

0