Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What size hard drive?

  • 03-09-2006 9:45pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 302 ✭✭


    I have an old computer that I'm going to format and use for storage. I want to put a bigger hard drive in it but I'm not sure how much it would handle. It's a Pentium 3 450 Mhz machine, will probably run XP Pro or Windows 2000. Any advice? Thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭Bob the Builder


    I think you should put max. 120GB into an old machine, As I'm sure you know cheap large HD's can be found everywhere, Its a matter of making sure they're compatible with your system.

    Also, try Debian Linux. It's a Linux Distro that work's well with old systems and on top of XP/Windows and it is very innovative to your needs

    Just my opinion to be honest. In any event, G'Luck!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 36,634 ✭✭✭✭Ruu_Old


    Any idea what the make/model of the motherboard is, some of us can probably verify what size your system can handle? Stick Windows XP on it, will be grand.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    I wouldn't put Xp on it unless you got more than 256mb of ram. It'd run so slowly it'd drive you mad.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 302 ✭✭Auburn


    Ruu wrote:
    Any idea what the make/model of the motherboard is, some of us can probably verify what size your system can handle? Stick Windows XP on it, will be grand.
    No sorry, I have no idea, I can't see any markings to identify it
    PogMoThoin wrote:
    I wouldn't put Xp on it unless you got more than 256mb of ram. It'd run so slowly it'd drive you mad.
    As far as I can remember it has 192mb of ram. I wouldn't be doing much with it so it won't bother me if it's a bit slow. I can always upgrade the ram if it annoys me too much I suppose


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 302 ✭✭Auburn


    nevf wrote:
    I think you should put max. 120GB into an old machine, As I'm sure you know cheap large HD's can be found everywhere, Its a matter of making sure they're compatible with your system.

    Cool, that would keep me going for a while :) Thanks


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    no point in putting XP on it.
    OEM licenses can't be put on it.
    Upgrade licenses would be bound to the PC if the previous OS was OEM

    a transferrable XP license is worth far more than the PC.

    2000 would be a better choice especially if it was originally supplied with the PC.

    If only using for storage a Linux OS might be a better choice since it's far better at running without a GUI (disable keyboard errors in the BIOS) , for windows a monitor and a keyboard are pretty well essential for those all to frequent "press any key to continue" moments. You can install VNC and other remote tools , pskill is also very useful

    finally the main difference between XP and 2000 is the extra bloat and eye-candy, XP has a firewall , but even NT4 allows you to block by port in TCP/IP properties. or just leave out the gateway or use NetBios instead


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭phil


    Keep away from Debian unless you know what you're doing or expect to have a bit of time on your hands (a bit = a lot) to play with it.

    Something like Ubuntu would be a much easier place to start from.

    Phil.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,167 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Whatever you put into it (big hard drive or Win XP) would be worth more than the computer itself. Only real difference between XP and 2K is the level of bloatware and the Playskool GUI.

    Also you will definately be limited to IDE architechture, so don't buy a SATA hard drive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,485 ✭✭✭✭Khannie


    120G is a good choice. After that point, you're relying on hardware support for 48bit addressing, which is probably not there on such an old machine.

    I have win2k running on a p2 450 with 256M of ram at home (just installed it last week). It's running grand. 2k is definitely a better choice than xp for a low end machine IMO.


Advertisement