Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Fun, fun, fun, until daddy took the T-bird away

  • 02-08-2006 8:16am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭


    Villain seems reasonable, dont really know a whole lot about him.
    I have recently doubled up with a rather dubious holding (and some dubious play to go with it).

    Do we like the CRAI line on the flop ... or do we prefer bet flop and push turn?


    Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ Hero (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

    SB ($2969.58)
    Hero ($1942)
    UTG ($980)
    MP ($1441.50)
    CO ($1009.75)
    Button ($372)

    Preflop: Hero is BB with Kspade.gif, Kclub.gif. SB posts a blind of $5.
    1 fold, MP raises to $40, 3 folds, Hero raises to $125, MP calls $85.

    Flop: ($255) 2spade.gif, 4spade.gif, 6spade.gif(2 players)
    Hero checks, MP bets $210, Hero calls $1817 (All-In).


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭pok3rplaya


    I like it given your image.

    It looks like something totally stupid and/or a draw.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 834 ✭✭✭peeko


    I can't see you walking away from it too quickly, so maybe a flop bet, turn push may have been better.

    If you get re-raised on the flop then a push and hope for an underpair with Spade


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭Gholimoli


    Judging by his pot size bet on the flop I think his got a made hand.
    If he does its prob a high pair which he would be willing to go to the felt with so I like the play unless he is player who can fold TT,JJ, here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 834 ✭✭✭peeko


    DoublePost


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭fuzzbox


    Seems like a boring hands so .....

    Results: He folded. .... well he thought, and then he folded.

    77-TT is my guess, possibly with a spade.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,450 ✭✭✭Gholimoli


    fuzzbox wrote:
    Seems like a boring hands so .....

    Results: He folded. .... well he thought, and then he folded.

    77-TT is my guess, possibly with a spade.
    your getting old and boring Fuzz.;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭fuzzbox


    Gholimoli wrote:
    your getting old and boring Fuzz.;)

    That happened a long time ago Gholi.

    I'm just sharing it with you all now :).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭Ste05


    Did you not consider just a normal C/R maybe make it 650 - 700, open push turn. I'd say looking at it you are both deep enough for another street of betting.

    My problem with a CRAI is that the only hands that will call the CRAI is a hand that beats you, AsA, made flush, (possibly) trips, you also shut out any potential bluffs, it also allows JsJ, QsQ to get away from their hand.
    Where as if you check raise the pot it might induce a Push (which I'd call, hoping not to see the nut flush) or allow a weaker hand to call such as JsJ, QsQ, etc.

    But I suppose alot of how to play the hand is based on the Villain...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭fuzzbox


    Ste05 wrote:
    Did you not consider just a normal C/R maybe make it 650 - 700, open push turn. I'd say looking at it you are both deep enough for another street of betting.

    My problem with a CRAI is that the only hands that will call the CRAI is a hand that beats you, AsA, made flush, (possibly) trips, you also shut out any potential bluffs, it also allows JsJ, QsQ to get away from their hand.
    Where as if you check raise the pot it might induce a Push (which I'd call, hoping not to see the nut flush) or allow a weaker hand to call such as JsJ, QsQ, etc.

    But I suppose alot of how to play the hand is based on the Villain...

    *normal* c/r?

    Why do you think he will go for his stack with QQ/JJ if I c/r small, but not if I c/r big?

    what difference do you think it makes?

    btw ... a pot-sized c/r would mean that I make it approx 1000 to play. He would be left with 300/400 if he called that ....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,337 ✭✭✭Bandana boy


    fuzzbox wrote:
    MP bets $210[/color], Hero calls $1817 (All-In).

    this looks a little likes the maximising your losses minimising your win push that i am prone 2 and oft berated for


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭fuzzbox


    this looks a little likes the maximising your losses minimising your win push that i am prone 2 and oft berated for

    Its effectively making it 1250 to play.
    A pot sized c/r is about 1000 to go.

    Capice?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,337 ✭✭✭Bandana boy


    fuzzbox wrote:
    Its effectively making it 1250 to play.
    A pot sized c/r is about 1000 to go.

    Capice?
    hey fuzz dude we all know that i like the push
    pushing is always good in this spot for me as i tend to get called by worse hands a lot (again a by product of me pushing a lot )

    but i am pretty sure in this spot before you advised a call quoting the maximising your losses minimizing your wins argument and your suggestion was call


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭fuzzbox


    hey fuzz dude we all know that i like the push
    pushing is always good in this spot for me as i tend to get called by worse hands a lot (again a by product of me pushing a lot )

    but i am pretty sure in this spot before you advised a call quoting the maximising your losses minimizing your wins argument and your suggestion was call

    I doubt it was in this spot. (being that I'm oop n all).

    When I dont have Ks, then check/call is fine, but I have Ks here. (and most guys at this level wont call a reraise like this with AQs- (especially with no dead money) so he almost never has the made-nut-flush).

    Him laying down AsKx is no bad thing for me. I wouldnt mind if he called with QQ/JJ tho ... but I suspect he had TT- and I got as much as I was likely to get really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭Ste05


    OK, I actually said I'd make it 650 - 700 to go, (I realise I said pot later in the post, but that was just a wording error) but I'd probably more like making it 600 to go. meaning that it'd be about 400 for him to call, giving him 2.6:1 pot odds, and 4.4:1 implied odds, (as I'll always open push the turn whatever falls). It'll also leave him with about 700 behind so he can fold to the turn push if he wants

    My thinking is there's a slightly better chance hands like JsJ, QsQ will play with those odds. And any hand that beats us it's doesn't matter what odds we offer as we're either drawing thin (made flush) or basically dead/ deadish (AsA, Asxs - [unlikely assuming you haven't been re-raising OOP often]).

    Even if there's a 5% increased chance of him playing with JsJ, QsQ, (see below my other thinking for this) then there's more value in a smaller CR as opposed to a CRAI, as in that case I don't think anything is calling that we beat. But it's pretty much a moot point as I think the most value available with this hand and board, was really as played, i.e. check, induce a bet, then tell him what we have, (basically AsA or KsK), so it probably doesn't matter how much we raise.

    My other reasons for thinking there might be a slightly better chance of a weaker hand continuing is that IMO it's easier for the Villain to Raise All-In than to call All-In with a weaker hand. Just the Gap Concept. I realise the Villain will probably realise he has little to no fold equity, but without much info on the Villain, as in this hand, my default is to assume that half decent players will make more mistakes by raising All-In rather than calling All-In (unless I've seen him making big calls like this previously).

    Just my 0.02c, but as said above, it probably doesn't matter how much you raise, he's folding nearly everything that we beat. It's just my opinion that a smaller raise has a higher chance of getting a weaker hand to play on (or a donkey to push with a weaker hand) as opposed to a CRAI. Even if that chance is 4% then I think there's more value in that.

    I also don't think this CRAI is a case of maximising losses as we're going to the felt with this hand regardless on the flop/turn and if he has us beat then it's just UL.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭fuzzbox


    Ste: all this presupposes that our villain doesnt realise that calling the 450 extra is pretty much the same as calling all-in with his QQ/JJ or whatever he has (although I dont even think he is as strong as QQ/JJ ... more like 88/77).

    Given that he would have to call 500 or so on the turn into a 2k pot n all.

    Most players at this level understand this, and CRAI looks more like a AsKx play, maybe eliciting a call.

    I still dont know if bet flop, shove turn would have worked better, but I guess I have to have to do this every now and again in order to be at least a little unpredictable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭Ste05


    fuzzbox wrote:
    Ste: all this presupposes that our villain doesnt realise that calling the 450 extra is pretty much the same as calling all-in with his QQ/JJ or whatever he has (although I dont even think he is as strong as QQ/JJ ... more like 88/77).

    Given that he would have to call 500 or so on the turn into a 2k pot n all.
    Yeah, I would have thought at this level they would understand that alright, I was just thinking as well as my reasoning behind the possibility of him pushing, there's also possibly a slight chance that he'll call and maybe take a gamble that he'll outdraw us here on the turn, (as our holding is pretty transparent), but all these things are just tiny possibilities as normally any player worth his salt, will realise this is effectively a CRAI, and play accordingly.

    But one thing I hate to do, is to over-estimate an opponent, and although it is the same as a CRAI, I just think it's easier to call 400 then 1140. But it's pretty much an academic debate at this point, basically it comes down to which bet looks weaker depending on your table image and style of play, (although against any decent or indeed most 5/10 players both are the same) and as you say:
    fuzzbox wrote:
    and CRAI looks more like a AsKx play, maybe eliciting a call.
    In which case the CRAI is better as it looks weaker, but as has been said before the CR basically ends the hand.
    fuzzbox wrote:
    I still dont know if bet flop, shove turn would have worked better, but I guess I have to have to do this every now and again in order to be at least a little unpredictable.
    I'm in two minds as well, one thing I suppose the flop bet has going for it, is that it might look like a standard cont. bet on what is not a favourable board for a raiser, it might induce the Villain to make a play here, or at least to try to float, (in which case we can CRAI the turn), but again it would depend on your frequency of cont. betting, and it also is such a scary board that I'd say a huge % of the time the Villain just folds. I think there's probably more value generally in a CR here, but alot of my decision would depend on my image and my image of the Villain, as to which I'd do, but I could certainly play it both ways and I think against most known opponents the most profitable play would be clear.


Advertisement