Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

IVF case

  • 12-07-2006 3:51pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 595 ✭✭✭


    I seem to have missed the outcome of the recent IVF case in the high court. Can anyone tell me what the results were.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 36,634 ✭✭✭✭Ruu_Old


    Is this the one you are talking about? Its the only article I could find about it anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 595 ✭✭✭Just The One


    Ruu wrote:
    Is this the one you are talking about? Its the only article I could find about it anyway.



    cheers - i just heard that the ruling is not until next Tuesday.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 834 ✭✭✭FillSpectre


    I can't get over the fact she has said even though he doesn't want another child with her she expects him to support the new child if she does. it is nearly as bad as the lesbians who "took" a guys sperm got pregnant and then sued him for support.
    If there were ever sexist laws before there are new ones now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    I can't get over the fact she has said even though he doesn't want another child with her she expects him to support the new child if she does. it is nearly as bad as the lesbians who "took" a guys sperm got pregnant and then sued him for support.
    If there were ever sexist laws before there are new ones now.

    It's pretty much the law of the land. He would be the genetic father, so she would be within her rights to demand maintanence etc. Which is a bit ****ed up tbh.


Advertisement