Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dublin Airport Authority has €140m for airports' debts

  • 21-06-2006 8:36am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 213 ✭✭


    Authority has €140m for airports' debts
    From:ireland.com
    Wednesday, 21st June, 2006


    Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) chairman Gary McGann has revealed the company has reserves of just €140 million at a time that it is being asked to take on debts from Cork and Shannon of €300 million.

    Mr McGann, speaking before the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Transport, said the authority needed to have enough reserves to break up the three airports, but this was not possible at present.

    The Government has spoken on several occasions about helping Cork and Shannon to grow by making them debt free, but this has proven hard to achieve.

    Mr McGann said that, while this may "sound like a technical accounting issue", unless the DAA had enough distributable reserves - effectively accumulated profits - it could not trigger a separation of the three airports.

    Mr McGann was downbeat about Shannon's future, especially with its current cost base. "Shannon is not viable with its current cost base," he said, adding that "significant underlying losses" were currently masked by the temporary impact of US military transit traffic.

    Mr McGann said the decision of the aviation regulator to sanction only a €6.14 per passenger charge at Dublin was a major financial headache for the authority. He said €7.50 was desperately needed so the airport could develop its various capital projects. The airport only had two sources of revenue, commercial income and airport charges, he noted.

    Mr McGann hinted that, in the years ahead, Aer Rianta International, which operates a number of overseas airports and duty free shops, should be owned by Dublin airport. He said it was unlikely to become part of Shannon airport and it needed to be sheltered by a company with a decent balance sheet. He said "strong logic and intuition" would indicate it should become part of Dublin.

    Mr McGann agreed Dublin airport was suffering from serious congestion, with passenger numbers rising by 15 per cent a year, twice the rate of growth at other international airports. He said he hoped this kind of growth would eventually settle down. He refused to comment on whether there was now a need for a second airport in Dublin.

    Declan Collier, DAA chief executive, said that if a new runway was not built by 2010, the airport would have to turn away aircraft.

    He said a planning application for a second terminal of 75,000-80,000 sq ft would be lodged during the summer with Fingal County Council. He said the size of the facility had to be increased following the receipt of fresh growth forecasts from the two main airlines - Ryanair and Aer Lingus.

    Several committee members, including Labour's Róisín Shorthall and Fianna Fáil's Jim Glennon, said that while there was congestion at peak periods, most of the time the airport operated well. However, Senator Shane Ross (Ind) said customers of the airport were treated with "total and utter contempt" and the airport was the "gateway to rip-off Ireland". He said foreign exchange outlets at the airport levied the highest commissions in the Republic.

    It looks like I may have been unfair to the airport authority in some of my previous posts but they have got to fight their corner in relation to assuming unrelated debt and break from the idea that capital expenditure can only be justified by higher landing fees.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    They could let one airport go and one stay pending further financial reserve buildup - but which one... decisions decisions. Do you cut loose the one which cocked up its new terminal commissioning or the one who pays FR to fly there and doesn't have as many grunts buying tat at the duty free?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Aidan1


    the one which cocked up its new terminal commissioning

    Have you any further information on that DowlingM? Latest I've heard that its opening on (or from) the 10th of July.

    The DAA may also want to consider the fact that SNN has a more active workforce in terms of unions, and more serious problems down the line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    Aidan1

    This thread should tell you more than you ever wanted to know :D
    http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=225304&page=1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,772 ✭✭✭Lennoxschips


    i was up at cork airport just a couple of hours ago. it was dark out, but all the lights were on in the new terminal, roads complete etc. even the displays above the check-in desks were all switched on. i don't know what is taking them so long. maybe they're having problems fitting the bog rolls or something....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Aidan1


    Thanks DowlingM, hadn't checked that thread in a while.

    Have heard loads of rumours, but no hard data on what the problem has been. Ministerial statements in the Dail generally fall into the category of 'rumour' too btw.

    As far as the airport is concerned, the new terminal will start operations on the 10th of July (at least thats what the retailers have been told) on a phased in basis.

    Also, does anyone know precisely how FR are given the inducements to continue flying into SNN? Surely there are state aid concerns?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 213 ✭✭Diaspora


    They are new routes as Shannon flights were traditionally Trans-Atlantic vs intra EU therefore the airport can slash or waive landing charges as 'promotional costs' to get new routes on a viable footing. How many of the routes stick beyond the 'promotional period' is anyones guess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,346 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    I'm sure KIR have "three years from SNN route inception" marked in their calendars for FR flights fleeing "increased charges" :rolleyes:


Advertisement