Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Sunglasses Gaffe - G.W. Bush

  • 15-06-2006 5:11am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,178 ✭✭✭


    Here we go folks...
    June 14, 2006 — The president was in a jovial mood during his Rose Garden press conference Wednesday, joshing with reporters, excited to aggressively defend the Iraq war in the midterm elections, optimistic about his recent trip to Baghdad.

    Then he was told a reporter he playfully teased about wearing sunglasses during the press conference has a serious vision problem and is legally blind.

    By the end of the day, the exchange had merited a presidential apology. The reporter, Peter Wallsten of the Los Angeles Times, said he bears no grudges and accepted the president's apology quickly.

    "Clearly the president has more important things to worry about," Wallsten said.

    The incident happened towards the end of the press conference, when the president called on the 34-year-old Wallsten.

    "Are you going to ask that question with shades on?" Bush asked.

    "I can take them off," Wallsten offered.

    "I'm interested in the shade look," replied Bush. "Seriously."

    Wallsten said, "All right, I'll keep it, then."

    "For the viewers," the president said to the TV cameras, "there's no sun." Some in the press corps laughed.

    "I guess it depends on your perspective," replied Wallsten, Zen-like.

    "Touché," said the president, who then took Wallsten's question about Karl Rove.


    A Presidential Apology


    Wallsten has Stargardt's Disease, a degeneration of the central area of the retina called the macula, where cells sensitive to light send visual signals to the brain.

    It turns out Wallsten wasn't trying to be hip or cool or cop a 'tude — he was wearing the pricey sunglasses because recent studies indicate that the progression of Stargardt's disease can be slowed by wearing sunglasses that protect the eyes from ultraviolet rays.

    Wallsten suspects the president was informed of his gaffe by White House Communications Director Nicolle Wallace, who knows Wallsten and been aware of his vision problem for years, dating back to when both were in Tallahassee, where he worked for the Miami Herald and she for Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.

    There's a few more pages - here's the link.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 36,634 ✭✭✭✭Ruu_Old


    and the foot in mouth award goes to... :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    "Clearly the president has more important things to worry about," Wallsten said.
    And so should we.

    Having an apparently idiot for a president is the political version of slight of hand. While the right hand seems to be making sure the top hat is positioned 'just so' on the stand, the left hand's secretly reaching for the hidden bunny rabbit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,202 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Goodshape wrote:
    And so should we.

    Having an apparently idiot for a president is the political version of slight of hand.

    What's this? Has the Prez got one withered hand?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,349 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    In fairness, I'll bash Bush as much as the next person (preferably with a brick), but he did nothing wrong there and was man enough to apologise about it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 850 ✭✭✭DOLEMAN


    In fairness, I'll bash Bush as much as the next person (preferably with a brick), but he did nothing wrong there and was man enough to apologise about it.

    I agree. It is fairly reasonable to assume a journalist is not blind. Also, he was just trying to have a bit of a laugh...


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    DOLEMAN wrote:
    I agree. It is fairly reasonable to assume a journalist is not blind. Also, he was just trying to have a bit of a laugh...
    And from that account of what was said it does not seem like the reporter was in anyway offended by the comments either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 432 ✭✭Daelus


    An honest mistake, really. And he did apologise. As Doleman said, he was just trying to have a laugh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭monkeyfudge


    Yep.. I'd be a bit annoyed if someone was to try to ask me a serious question while wearing sunglasses.

    Stargardt's disease certainly wouldn't be at the front of my mind... but it's been highlighted for me now... and I'll be sure to keep it in mind in future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    not really a big deal.
    it's not as if he invaded a couple of countries or anytihng.


    oh, wait...


Advertisement