"Best Round" Clarification Question

c0y0te

Here's a quick question for you BF2 heads. I'm looking at my stats and noticing (for example) that I'm 4 "best rounds" away from getting a medal/award of some description for the Chinese side. I already have the same thing for the MEC and USA.

Is "best round" - getting the gold start for coming first?

Or is it something to do with getting best sniper or best medic etc. within a round?

What exactly is 'best round' in this context?

KdjaCL

What website you looking at the stats on?


kdjac

c0y0te

The link is as follows:-

http://bf2s.com/player/44641235/

Now that I see the stats again it's the 'peoples medallion' that got me curious, but the question relates to any reference to 'best round' in general I guess.

Jackabo

Yeah i think it is for getting best medic,sniper,engineer etc

AnCapaillMor

The peoples medallion from what i can gather looking at your stats you need one round as chinese in which you score over 100 points, then you get your medallion. BF2S is'nt the greatest, try this place and check the awards, gives more details.

http://www.bf2player.com/index.php?page=stats&show=&account=44641235

Spear

c0y0te wrote:

What exactly is 'best round' in this context?

It means the single highest score in a single round ever achieved as that faction. In your case it's currently 94 as PLA. So you'll need a round of 100 or more at some point, one way or another. A low player count on a 64 player Wake Island would be a good place.

AnCapaillMor

Dalian Plant or songhua with 20 or so players on a 64 is great for racking up points.

d22ontour

G.F.F server springs to mind for a HIGH POINTS server,32 players on a 64 player map.Some servers even have it in the name in ingame browser.Worst i joined was what i thought was a 16 player map only to find 14 players out of 16 on a 64 player map.Stat paddin tbh.Them kind of servers should be took off the list me thinks.

Spear

d22ontour wrote:

G.F.F server springs to mind for a HIGH POINTS server,32 players on a 64 player map.Some servers even have it in the name in ingame browser.Worst i joined was what i thought was a 16 player map only to find 14 players out of 16 on a 64 player map.Stat paddin tbh.Them kind of servers should be took off the list me thinks.

It varies as to how they're achieving "high points". Some are just 16 players on a 64 size map, which is legal and legit. Some have deliberate attempted restrictions like no armour etc. They aren't legit or allowed by EA.

SeantheMan

d22ontour wrote:

G.F.F server springs to mind for a HIGH POINTS server,32 players on a 64 player map.Some servers even have it in the name in ingame browser.Worst i joined was what i thought was a 16 player map only to find 14 players out of 16 on a 64 player map.Stat paddin tbh.Them kind of servers should be took off the list me thinks.

It's 24 man on a 64map size :eek:
I used to like the 24 man on 32...and so dont play there anymore:(
Bring back normal sizes GFF pls :rolleyes:

c0y0te

Thanks for the info

Drapper

SeantheMan wrote:

It's 24 man on a 64map size :eek:
I used to like the 24 man on 32...and so dont play there anymore:(
Bring back normal sizes GFF pls :rolleyes:

if you pay server fees I'm sure they will make the maps any size you like ! :p

SeantheMan

I offered to contribute to running of server costs to make it 32man :eek: :eek:
No paypal button as of yet :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Each to their own though, i will happily return when its back to the old ways

Atlas_IRL

its gotten too laggy for me, i'd fire a tv and the screen would stall and i could find out without even knowing that i killed two people

Lister1

Each to their own though, i will happily return when its back to the old ways

Server is still great but we probably need to do a clean out of some of the maps now that we are playing the 64 man versions.

ts gotten too laggy for me

Can you let me know if you are still getting problems with lag as there have been a few people that have brought this up recently.