Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Using a link to a photo ....

  • 25-03-2006 12:24pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭


    I provide a link to a photo, in a post in a public Forum (as part of a technical question) .....

    The site in question/photo is freely available to all on the web ....

    I get a message from the Webmaster of the site hosting the photo etc ....

    "you are using up my bandwidth"

    "you didn't ask my permission" etc etc ....

    Am I really the bad guy on this? .....

    (the host of the forum I raised the question on was quite happy ..... the photo demonstrated my question perfectly .... I didn't copy the photo but simply provided a link to it ..... and I received lots of good replies)


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,937 ✭✭✭fade2black


    Quick answer is yes. The admins of this forum will regularly get mails from people who are imorally/ilegally linking images in their sigs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭hobie


    Quick answer is yes

    not what I was hoping for :( ..... but the signature example makes a good point :rolleyes:

    could I try it this way ...... I post the Address i.e. not a hyperlink .... but just directions to get to the photo ..... the photo will not show unless someone specifically wants to go look at it ....

    example ... Trevor Seargent photo ..... to see it add http://

    dynimg.rte.ie/00007f4e0b2.jpg

    Would that be ok? .... :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    You can't win. People don't want you using their bandwidth to display an image which they've made freely available for viewing on the Internet. Yet, they may not want you to copy it and host it elsewhere for copyright reasons.

    Upload the image to a free image hosting site like imageshack.us (Pop in the URL and it'll copy it over). Then, link to the image on the free host, and in your posts state the original owner's details.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,937 ✭✭✭fade2black


    Yep..that'd be your best bet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    yeah but seriously though. What kindof tightwad is going to complain about a hotlinked image taking up bandwidth, unless it was a seriously popular thread and the image was 2MB+ or something.

    I hotlink all the time, not for the fun of it but for the same reason as hobie. If i need help with a subject and i've found a bit of information pertaining to it, i'm either going to post a link to the site (eating up more of their bandwidth by downloading their whole page) or i'm going to just post the image that's relevant. Agreeably not everone who views the thread is going to go to the link, but then again the bandwidth saved by not making people go to the hosts entire page might counter balance this. Either way we'll never know unless we endeavor into some serious statistical research into the area.

    Regardless, the understanding on the matter is that it IS ILLEGAL to hotlink by infringing on some (c) laws of the owner.

    But it happens, along with piracy, hacking, cracking, warez, spamming...etc. The internet is festering with illegality, if hotlinking was the worst we had to worry about I think we'd be a helluvalot better off.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    An aside,but: Providing a direct link, as opposed to inline image, may not reduce as many hits to the owner's server as you may think with a lot of people using "advanced caching" or "prefetch" techniques. (i.e. Users browser automatically,and in the background,downloads a copy of where the link is pointing.) And, despite the small filesize, it is unwanted & unexpected traffic and stress on another's server which may impact on performance.

    At the end of the day, I do it. Most people do it. But if you receive a complaint, you are bound by decency and (possibly) law to respect their wishes and provide an alternative solution.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭hobie


    At the end of the day, I do it. Most people do it. But if you receive a complaint, you are bound by decency and (possibly) law to respect their wishes and provide an alternative solution.

    oh well :( ....

    I did delete the link as soon as the guy complained .... I didn't want to copy and paste the photo on my own photo hosting site simply because I do think that could be called "Pinching a photo" ..... I guess I thought I was doing the guy an indirect favour by getting more traffic to his site and solving my problem at the same time :rolleyes: .... but he very much thought the opposite ....

    ..... and I don't even down load free music .... or take drugs or even $$$$$$$ drink! ..... my life !!!! :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,396 ✭✭✭✭Karoma


    Understandable.
    When you're directly linking to an image or any 1 thing- you're not doing him a favour, merely using his resources. Pointing a page on his server may prove beneficial to him, as he may be getting paid for impressions through advertising.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭hobie


    Pointing to a page on his server may prove beneficial to him, as he may be getting paid for impressions through advertising.

    I did actually post a link to his site home page under the photo but the link itself was deleted by the 'someone' ..... then the request came in to delete the photo ..... you can't win can you .... :rolleyes:


Advertisement